SoraJS wrote:
Lewis_is_java wrote:
SoraJS wrote:
Anon_Gaming wrote:
AA RFLeX wrote:
Raeker wrote:
In Dutch "Spook" means ghost, so if I start talking in Dutch and casually mention a ghost movie I'm suddenly racist????
Also, "Spook" is sometimes also an actual name people have. Are they suddenly racist for having parents that gave them their name?
Keep in mind that this is not a Dutch speaking community and that its an English one.
And keep in mind, the original english language, the original place of the english language, has NOT ever had that word as a Racial slur.
the word "Spook" in the english language, is todo with a ghost/scare. and that dates to a very long time ago, which is still it's definition today, AND even in the English dictionary is listed with that, NOT a definition, that simulated from america.
If we're taking that argument wouldn't that make a vast majority of very common racial slurs allowed then?
Name one
The N word was never in the original english language and had a racially offensive definition formed over a time I believe.
The N words definition, has ALWAYS been the same, from the time it was first used.
The term Picnicis a racial slur, So we can no longer use it, or we will get in trouble, same is "Cracker, Redneck, Casper, calling a white person a Ghost".
term 8Mile, also a racial slur.
"Ace Of Spaded".
And also in the american side, the word "Coconut" is also racial.
So, from the statements provided and used in this post, currently states that we can no longer use so many words, such as coconut