Quimoth wrote:
If you kill an innocent that hasn't fired a single bullet at you, how is that NOT traitorous. The game was a mere 30 seconds going, in that 30 seconds he HELPED kill a detective (deduction made me draw this conclusion the moment i noticed the dead guy was detective). Even if grens had T-baited him, he and grens had not had eye contact for at least 10 seconds prior to him shooting grens, how can he not have typed anything to warn grens or warn others that grens was a T? Moreover he was still full health.
Killing an innocent is always traitorous, unless a reason is given prior to killing or right after if there were no direct witnesses and it was selfdefense. This wasn't selfdefense because again, i only heard broken his gun and even silenced guns make noise, neither were they in melee range or was grens holding a traitor weapon.
I witness someone killing someone out of the blue at round start, they ID, I need to ask why they do it? Is this actually the rule? even if i can confirm that the victim DIDNT DO SHIT because i witnessed every single event that unfolded between the two?
That is how the rule SHOULD be, the only reason i can come up with for the current bullshit that forces me to ask and get myself killed in the process is because staff is lazy.
Must agree, this rule more often than not leads to inconvenient situations and can be abused. However, those are the rules and I must believe someone complained about this rule in the past and it wasn't changed. And it is understandable, it prevents (or tries to) more than it allows.
In what I've quoted:
-If an innocent hasn't fired a single round at you specifically, you can't assume he didn't do so to anyone else, unless you've been with him for the entire game.
-I myself often don't KoS or mention anything and silently come up to someone to shoot them in the head in my comfort. If they want an explanation I always do so in the report.
-Killing an innocent is not always traitorous because of an ample of factors: RDMers, nades, crossfire etc. I do not have to give any reason as to why I killed someone unless I am directly asked to do so, according to the rules.
-I often don't join gunfights even if it's a detective, because I cba. If the detective dies, I sometimes don't even bother killing the player and just stroll around. Why? It doesn't matter. If you were to see me witness it and do nothing, killing me would be considered RDM.
In your case (I don't say I support the rules here. I only follow them.), killing player B was the correct play. But unfortunately, Broken killing the innocent right near you and IDing his body, then you killing him right away is RDM. You should've asked. Unless he shot you first, then I do think you're in the right.