The poor attitude is a result of a bad rule being applied where it doesn't belong to begin with.

If he first doesnt kill the obivous traitor, then kills a random person with what i assumed to be crossfire because that player walked between the two of us. Perhaps you find it flakey proof, but i would 10/10 do it again and take the slay when some staff member thinks they actually got a reason to be mad at me for shooting them like this.

He was just doing a TERRIBLE job hiding that he was a traitor, but on this server we have a rule that is being used all to often to supply and ENCOURAGE this kind of behavior instead of people just taking it like a man.

How is it that this fucking rule is here to boost traitors chances instead of actually preventing mass-rdm (something that is rare as opposed to this rule being abused by traitors).

If you kill an innocent that hasn't fired a single bullet at you, how is that NOT traitorous. The game was a mere 30 seconds going, in that 30 seconds he HELPED kill a detective (deduction made me draw this conclusion the moment i noticed the dead guy was detective). Even if grens had T-baited him, he and grens had not had eye contact for at least 10 seconds prior to him shooting grens, how can he not have typed anything to warn grens or warn others that grens was a T? Moreover he was still full health.

Killing an innocent is always traitorous, unless a reason is given prior to killing or right after if there were no direct witnesses and it was selfdefense. This wasn't selfdefense because again, i only heard broken his gun and even silenced guns make noise, neither were they in melee range or was grens holding a traitor weapon.
I witness someone killing someone out of the blue at round start, they ID, I need to ask why they do it? Is this actually the rule? even if i can confirm that the victim DIDNT DO SHIT because i witnessed every single event that unfolded between the two?
That is how the rule SHOULD be, the only reason i can come up with for the current bullshit that forces me to ask and get myself killed in the process is because staff is lazy.

TL;DR; If i would've asked the outcome would've been one of these: A. I died while asking. B. He died regardless of his response because it was complete bullshit.

The poor attitude is a result of a bad rule being applied where it doesn't belong to begin with. If he first doesnt kill the obivous traitor, then kills a random person with what i assumed to be crossfire because that player walked between the two of us. Perhaps you find it flakey proof, but i would 10/10 do it again and take the slay when some staff member thinks they actually got a reason to be mad at me for shooting them like this. He was just doing a TERRIBLE job hiding that he was a traitor, but on this server we have a rule that is being used all to often to supply and ENCOURAGE this kind of behavior instead of people just taking it like a man. How is it that this fucking rule is here to boost traitors chances instead of actually preventing mass-rdm (something that is rare as opposed to this rule being abused by traitors). If you kill an innocent that hasn't fired a single bullet at you, how is that NOT traitorous. The game was a mere 30 seconds going, in that 30 seconds he HELPED kill a detective (deduction made me draw this conclusion the moment i noticed the dead guy was detective). Even if grens had T-baited him, he and grens had not had eye contact for at least 10 seconds prior to him shooting grens, how can he not have typed anything to warn grens or warn others that grens was a T? Moreover he was still full health. Killing an innocent is always traitorous, unless a reason is given prior to killing or right after if there were no direct witnesses and it was selfdefense. This wasn't selfdefense because again, i only heard broken his gun and even silenced guns make noise, neither were they in melee range or was grens holding a traitor weapon. I witness someone killing someone out of the blue at round start, they ID, I need to ask why they do it? Is this actually the rule? even if i can confirm that the victim DIDNT DO SHIT because i witnessed every single event that unfolded between the two? That is how the rule SHOULD be, the only reason i can come up with for the current bullshit that forces me to ask and get myself killed in the process is because staff is lazy. TL;DR; If i would've asked the outcome would've been one of these: A. I died while asking. B. He died regardless of his response because it was complete bullshit.