I'm talking here about someone using the rules to BREAK the game.

The fact that some of you act like he was right just because of him abusing a rule is a SHAME. Just because the rules state I should ask, why should I? When no answer he could've given would've let me keep him walking around without my remmington rounds in his brain.

He THINKS I didn't see him shooting the detective, just because he didn't fire the last bullet doesn't mean I was fully aware it was either him or anyone else down there who killed the detective (and it was indeed him). As I said, i knew at least 3 people were firing. The traitor I killed was full hp when I killed him, he killed the detective. Deduction leads to the simple conclusion, BROKEN MUST BE THE OTHER TRAITOR. He gets pissed at me using my brains and him not using his by putting a bullet in my brains before I do the same to him. That doesn't mean he is justly applying or following any rules. It means he is being a big fat asshole abusing them.

I disrespected him because he DESERVES no respect when he abuses the rules like this. He knew I witnessed him not doing anything about the dead detective, even though it happened right in front of him (he was closer to the action than I was). This would've come to a situation where he would've had to kill me or be killed by me within a few seconds when janez was dead. Instead he goes on killing and I kill him for it because the person he killed couldn't have possibly done anything worse than the person he just tried to let go with killing a detective.

But for the rule fetishists among you: he used a loophole to make it seem like I broke a rule that I didn't even need to break to kill him.

I'm talking here about someone using the rules to BREAK the game. The fact that some of you act like he was right just because of him abusing a rule is a SHAME. Just because the rules state I should ask, why should I? When no answer he could've given would've let me keep him walking around without my remmington rounds in his brain. He THINKS I didn't see him shooting the detective, just because he didn't fire the last bullet doesn't mean I was fully aware it was either him or anyone else down there who killed the detective (and it was indeed him). As I said, i knew at least 3 people were firing. The traitor I killed was full hp when I killed him, he killed the detective. Deduction leads to the simple conclusion, BROKEN MUST BE THE OTHER TRAITOR. He gets pissed at me using my brains and him not using his by putting a bullet in my brains before I do the same to him. That doesn't mean he is justly applying or following any rules. It means he is being a big fat asshole abusing them. I disrespected him because he DESERVES no respect when he abuses the rules like this. He knew I witnessed him not doing anything about the dead detective, even though it happened right in front of him (he was closer to the action than I was). This would've come to a situation where he would've had to kill me or be killed by me within a few seconds when janez was dead. Instead he goes on killing and I kill him for it because the person he killed couldn't have possibly done anything worse than the person he just tried to let go with killing a detective. But for the rule fetishists among you: he used a loophole to make it seem like I broke a rule that I didn't even need to break to kill him.