Morgan wrote:
Anna wrote:
Well what happened... haha that's quite a story.
It really wasn't that funny, but let's see.
Anna wrote:
I didn't really feel like joining SSRP too much and I got caught up in other games.
This was a big frustration for us, you seemed to blow off SSRP and then at the same time had almost a hundred hours on other games in the past two weeks that could have been spent on SSRP, but you chose not to.
Anna wrote:
This was the first week which I had a "normal" week again. This time I, in fact, DID play on the server, and I did, in fact, do my duty.
We looked through all of the logs and seemingly didn't find any trace of you really doing your job of what is expected with this role.
Anna wrote:
Yes, my activity wasn't much last week, I agree on that. But It was still an improvement of what It used to be.
Anna wrote:
And as far as I know, people know I am someone who improves in steps, I don't scale a mountain at once, I do it in steps.
It was still little to no work on your part, the head admin roll unfortunately isn't that easily comparable to a staircase like you're trying to make it seem with the whole "Taking 1 step at a time to improve". We gave you multiple official warnings, but you still had done little to none with the position you were promoted to even during this week you were back to a certain extent.
Anna wrote:
I'm appealing because I do kinda still like SSRP,
You only "kinda still like" the server? From the way you're wording it, it sounds like your interest is hanging on by a thread for the server, and your activity honestly reflects that.
Anna wrote:
Yes, my activity was low, and yes I agree with it. But I don't think you should instantly demote me
After the multiple official warnings, weeks of inactivity proceeding each one, this definitely was not an instant demotion. Your activity was low, the work you put in reflected it, what would the point of demoting you to Moderator or Administrator be if this sort of behavior had been continuous?
Anna wrote:
because I am someone who improves stuff slowly this wasn't really completely my fault.
We gave you so many chances, 10 to 11 weeks at the most, we are there to help you to an extent, but this was just completely crossing the line and at the end of the day we had to take action.
At the end of the day, you were given
multiple official warnings, countless weeks to work with the issues and hopefully come out on top of them with improved activity and getting back to helping out the servers - but we saw little to nothing from you at the end of the day. You were a great staff member Akemi, but during these past 10 weeks it's felt you've only drifted away from the team, lost interest playing other steam games, and at the end of the day we had to take action. This demote appeal is not fair to any of us and only selfish.
It's obviously not a real funny story. But meh.
It was before personal issues happened, which you would've seen if you were to read it all clearly.
I did do it, It's not my fault that punishments don't get removed, and besides that, searching for stuff through 2 accounts.
over a week it's possible you can skip stuff. Besides that I didn't just do it In-game, I've had a long talk with a user a few days ago explaining how stuff worked and such, I do stuff over Teamspeak and as far as I know, you guys wouldn't have checked for that (if it's even possible)
Once again, the official warnings were given before I was Forced to go inactive thanks to the personal issues, what happened beforehand is indeed my fault which once again I did admit to in the story. which once again you would know if you read it all. I did, in fact, show improvement that week before I had to go inactive again.
Even if I was hanging on a thread, why would I write and bother to make an appeal this detailed? Something I wouldn't do if I really lost interest.
Anna wrote:
Once again, the official warnings were given before I was Forced to go inactive thanks to the personal issues, what happened beforehand is indeed my fault which once again I did admit to in the story. which once again you would know if you read it all. I did, in fact, show improvement that week before I had to go inactive again.
And at last, because you're repeating yourself each time. This appeal is completely fair for me to make, I did, in fact, do my job and I did improve on it this week, after which I still managed to get demoted.
--
CaptinF1rework wrote:
You deserved to be demoted without a shadow of a doubt;
- Multiple Official Warnings.
- Continued inactivity for many weeks. (8+)
- Lack of input in meetings, with minimal attendance.
- Constantly playing other games.
- Didn't improve when given the opportunity.
Overall we can see that this demotion wasn't sudden or out of the blue, you were given plenty of warning and time to improve. I really can't believe that you have appealed this, you can't say you weren't seeing this, it shocks me that you think you deserve another chance. After many official warnings you don't deserve to be given another chance. Staff should see you as a role model, not an inactive staff member who only plays on other games.
You guys just love repeating eachother don't you?
- Multiple Official Warnings, which happened before my forced inactivity from the personal problem.
- Continued inactivity for many weeks. (8+) Once again I was FORCED to go inactive AGAIN because of the personal issues.
- Lack of input in meetings, with minimal attendance. Check ur facts, I've been to EVERY SINGLE meeting except for those which were held during the weeks I was inactive.
- Constantly playing other games. I was playing other games as I was inactive I explained this aswell, you guys really need to read this shit fully.
- Didn't improve when given the opportunity. This is a straight up lie. I did improve after my inactivity, I had a week of perfectly normal activity before I was FORCED to go inactive. Which means I DID improve. And once again, I did improve last week, as I had more than 0 activity didn't I?