TOPIC: Who can do the most F1's [GiveAway]

OnionRings wrote:
Yeah, come on guys, WHAT A STUPID IDEA? PAYING EMPLOYEES? NO ONE DOES THAT!

I mean, I LOVE The fact that F1's take 30 minutes to get a response, I think it's better that way!

Guys. Come on. I see nothing wrong with this. To fix the issue of "COMPETITIVE" staff, just add the rule "No stealing F1's" or whatever, problem solved done deal.

For the fear of F1's being rushed - This would filter good staff from bad staff. If someone rushes, they get the risk of :
1. Being demoted/Punished for incorrectly handling F1's.
2. Disqualified from the competition.

For the fear of F1's being farmed -
Again, if staff get corrupt and help each other by making F1's by each other to up their count or anything in those lines, he shouldn't be staff. End of story.

Staff, already, give up their time that they can use to PLAY the game, just to keep the server clean for OTHERS. Incentive and motivation for them to keep doing that is FAR from a bad idea.

Spoderman is doing an incredible thing with this and in my opinion, is a very good work around for that problem for someone in his position.

Staff should be rewarded for doing a good job. Shit like "Employee of the month" and whatnot in smaller companies, or even larger ones, motivate staff to work harder. Competition in itself isn't a bad thing, as it ups the standards.

To fix this more, you can also look at the QUALITY of F1's responses, as well as the count.

IMO, Staff should be rewarded more. They give up their time for them to keep the server clean. I've said this many times before, but staff get shit for doing their job, giving up their time and whatnot.

Luki_Guki wrote:
the fuck you on about bro lol you've completely lost it

Svanzscape wrote:
Thanks for writing such a detailed response and i agree 100% with you hence this post

Roy Specter wrote:
And you roy should take the time to read others response and try to to consider their opinions and statements. Simply outweigh the negatives and positives and you'll come to a good result.

Uuhhh hot thing fam!
Some extra money for simply doing my Job

Time to start rushing f1s!

You think I don't care what others have said? If I didn't I wouldn't have replied multiple times to this topic.

Besides that there's not much to it. You either see it as something that motivates the team or as something that corrupts the team.

So every lead team member on here chatting shit can think of a better suggestion to get people to do f1s? Ah right no one can because they just like saying shit and not backing it up. Big shocker to all the SSRP lead team members: yelling at your staff to do f1s and doing jack shit else is not going to help the situation

Shark wrote:
Since you're chatting shit you seem to have all the answers?

Roy Specter wrote: Not claiming I have all the answers but at least Spoder is attempting to do something other than yelling

Shark wrote:
Didn't yell, I asked him to shut this down nicely and explained why

If you personally haven't seen any results, that doesn't mean that the Lead Team haven't tried anything or worked on any solutions.

Roy Specter wrote:
And me and several others has proven that shutting this down is a worse idea then this

Shark wrote:
What spoder is doing is wrong imo. It is basically going’s to be a competition on who gets the best f1s and that is not what we want on the team. We work as a team for a reason we don’t just rush through f1s to say “I have a higher f1 count than you”. Personally I have been thinking of many ways to get staff to actually help out but a lot of times it doesn’t even work.

Ever since the minimum f1 count it has actually gotten worse as staff see it as if I get 20 f1’s I will be grand and that’s the issue. Most staff stop when they get to 20 and there’s nothing we can do about it as it’s the minimum. Imo it should be atleast 40 f1’s a week or else there’s really no point it actually having it.

I do see that lots of users complain about staff and f1s but there’s nothing we can actually do. It’s been here for years and there’s no way to change it. However I will try my best to think of something but I don’t know if it will work.

Hope you understand where I am coming from.

You actually haven't proven anything, but neither have we. You don't want to listen to what me and Onion and others have to say, I can't stop you from your plan. But when it backfires, I'm gonna say I told you so.

Roy Specter wrote:
Or instead of waiting to shit on others because they have a method you don't agree with, how about you do the mature thing and wish them luck while continuing to develop your own ideas? As stated before, plenty of Lead Team members have thought of ways to improve the team with admittedly poor results. I see no reason why a one time run of a different method should be shunned so hard and used against them when it is clear they are attempting to do what plenty of others have tried and failed to improve on.

ChummyXRay wrote:
Someone was demoted for doing something very similar.

ChummyXRay wrote:
You're right regarding the fact that I'm being too harsh on Spoder, thanks Chummy.

Even though I highly disagree with this, I should thank you Spoder (and Pegasus) for putting in the effort (and in-game finance) to try and fix a flaw in the team.

I obviously know your intentions are good; I did indeed bash out at the idea and you when I should have done otherwise, even though I disagree completely.

Good luck with getting this method to succeed. If you need someone to help you with keeping an eye out on a specific someone you feel is not properly competing, you know who to contact.

OnionRings wrote:
Someone was demoted for offering a small event for staff? How about instead of skirting around it, explain it all. I think it is pretty clear that no one will be demoted for this seeing as no CM/Owner has come out to shut this down.

@Onion As far as I'm aware he was demoted for low LTM attendance. Himself says this was one of the reasons but I was told otherwise by higher ups.

Quality not quantity~