ChummyXRay wrote:
You're right regarding the fact that I'm being too harsh on Spoder, thanks Chummy.

Even though I highly disagree with this, I should thank you Spoder (and Pegasus) for putting in the effort (and in-game finance) to try and fix a flaw in the team.

I obviously know your intentions are good; I did indeed bash out at the idea and you when I should have done otherwise, even though I disagree completely.

Good luck with getting this method to succeed. If you need someone to help you with keeping an eye out on a specific someone you feel is not properly competing, you know who to contact.

[quote="ChummyXRay" post=774265][spoiler][quote="Roy Specter" post=774258]You actually haven't proven anything, but neither have we. You don't want to listen to what me and Onion and others have to say, I can't stop you from your plan. But when it backfires, I'm gonna say I told you so.[/quote] Or instead of waiting to shit on others because they have a method you don't agree with, how about you do the mature thing and wish them luck while continuing to develop your own ideas? As stated before, plenty of Lead Team members have thought of ways to improve the team with admittedly poor results. I see no reason why a one time run of a different method should be shunned so hard and used against them when it is clear they are attempting to do what plenty of others have tried and failed to improve on.[/spoiler][/quote] You're right regarding the fact that I'm being too harsh on Spoder, thanks Chummy. Even though I highly disagree with this, I should thank you Spoder (and Pegasus) for putting in the effort (and in-game finance) to try and fix a flaw in the team. I obviously know your intentions are good; I did indeed bash out at the idea and you when I should have done otherwise, even though I disagree completely. Good luck with getting this method to succeed. If you need someone to help you with keeping an eye out on a specific someone you feel is not properly competing, you know who to contact.