TOPIC: [TTT] New rdm rule suggestion

Have it be considered RDM to single out and kill a twice confirmed innocent with 4 people standing near a pile of bodies with a single unidentified body among them, in a sort of common sense rule, as it should be quite clear that the person being shot is not a traitor, especially from the POV of someone who has played on the server for a long time.

Pros: Less forum posts by me if the rule is added
Cons: Less forum posts by me if the rule is added

DANlEL wrote: zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/report-ab...tt-report-for-rdm-on

Who are you btw?

why are you so mad about a virtual telling off lmao

TheFierceOwl wrote: Someone who doesn't see much reason to argue with someone who unironically argued that staff should never be punished. That's the reason I dismissed Guki's comment. Is there a problem with this?

Chespin wrote: Do you not think there is a problem with me being killed like that and it not being considered rdm? If you don't think there is a problem with it, we will just have to agree to disagree.

The Festive Potato wrote: no, bc it's not rdm, id the body next time

Hey man! It seems that you have used the wrong template. Use this one instead TEMPLATE

Like I told you before, you're always free to add me on Discord if you want to start being able to think properly. I gave you my discord name in your prevous post, so add me any time you want help.

I can also give you some numbers to any local danish psychologists just hit me up, it seems like you need one for the trauma you have experienced.

Luki_Guki wrote: Chespin wrote:

Your situation is very stupid and I agree with you on that. Sure it is text book T-baiting but rules are meant to be used as guidance, not as mindless to the point procedure. You were confirmed innocent twice, so why would another kill the confirmed if they themselves were innocent?

However this badgering won't make your cause any favourable.

Studio Banter wrote:

Studio is absolutely right, me and Potato are currently talking about this and I hope we'll come to an agreement

Luki_Guki wrote: This aged poorly very quickly.

If you want to suggest a rule change please use the correct template. However if your point is to argue the fact that your report was denied this ain't the right title nor place. Please contact a lead team member or community manager to discuss this.

Kurze wrote: Theres nothing really lost from not using the template, and I am suggesting that doing this should be considered RDM, nothing to do with the report, I only linked it for context. The rule can easily be formulated as something like "Use common sense when dealing with confirmed innocents" or something of that nature.

I'll give you 24 hours to use the correct template as provided by Luki or this will be locked!

I'd recommend actually writing out an example of what the rule should be rather than a vague idea so that people know exactly what it is that you want added!

The Festive Potato wrote:
*Expecting TTT players to have, or even know what common sense is*

The rule is you’re not allowed to ignore unidentified bodies, so if you didn’t try and go for them then someone who hasn’t seen that you’re proven may see that as a traitorous play

Kyber wrote:
I could use your logic and then say that killing a confirmed innocent is traitor baiting and a traitorous play.

Studio Banter wrote: Yes, however there can always be a reason to kill them, such as them shooting you first, which would mean you are not committing a traitorous act. Yes he shouldn’t be killed if he’s confirmed, but I’m saying if someone new joins and doesn’t understand you’re proven or they haven’t paid attention to the game and sees you commit a traitorous act then you could be killed for it. Also by ‘confirmed twice’ I’m guessing this is from traitors as you would just say you have been tested innocent, so if the person hadn’t been tested then your point would be invalid as there is still a shadow of a doubt that the person could be a traitor

Studio Banter wrote: when this happens handling staff should say too bad for the reporter and reported because there will never be perfect rules to make a perfect gameplay .. alot of suspicion and kosable scenarios that rules wont be able to cover , imo the dude should've used his brain and not kill him but if he did? So what move on. I do not think adding / editing rules will help , it will add more problems .