Studio Banter wrote: Yes, however there can always be a reason to kill them, such as them shooting you first, which would mean you are not committing a traitorous act. Yes he shouldn’t be killed if he’s confirmed, but I’m saying if someone new joins and doesn’t understand you’re proven or they haven’t paid attention to the game and sees you commit a traitorous act then you could be killed for it. Also by ‘confirmed twice’ I’m guessing this is from traitors as you would just say you have been tested innocent, so if the person hadn’t been tested then your point would be invalid as there is still a shadow of a doubt that the person could be a traitor

[quote="Studio Banter" post=1258238][quote="Kyber" post=1258237]The rule is you’re not allowed to ignore unidentified bodies, so if you didn’t try and go for them then someone who hasn’t seen that you’re proven may see that as a traitorous play[/quote] I could use your logic and then say that killing a confirmed innocent is traitor baiting and a traitorous play.[/quote] Yes, however there can always be a reason to kill them, such as them shooting you first, which would mean you are not committing a traitorous act. Yes he shouldn’t be killed if he’s confirmed, but I’m saying if someone new joins and doesn’t understand you’re proven or they haven’t paid attention to the game and sees you commit a traitorous act then you could be killed for it. Also by ‘confirmed twice’ I’m guessing this is from traitors as you would just say you have been tested innocent, so if the person hadn’t been tested then your point would be invalid as there is still a shadow of a doubt that the person could be a traitor