Login to ZARP
|
The post survived the night! Lets go and from what im seeing no deleted replies, good to see a no hate debate/discussion going well, nice one lads! Replied to a few of you \/ \/
Morgan Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Morgan wrote:
I would not be interested in dating a trans person, does that mean I am super straight? Under the definition of super straight yes you are. PZGrens Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] PZGrens wrote:
I believe that its a product of internalized homophobia/transphobia. Imagine being so insecure in your sexuality that you have to label yourself as "super straight". That being said I am a firm believer that people should be able to identify as whatever they view themselves as internally in order to make themselves feel more comfortable and that extends to people that I disagree with. This comes across as contradicting. Nogtog Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Nogtog wrote:
illegalimmigrant wrote:
narexa wrote:
Yeah but the point is that the term should not exist. Just say you don't want to date trans people for whatever reason that might be without using a ridiculous term that makes you sound like a neo-nazi. What's next? Super White?Morgan wrote:
No it sounds like he's superstraight by definitionI would not be interested in dating a trans person, does that mean I am super straight? No, you're just straight. I personally don't believe it makes you transphobic to not necessarily want to date trans people, (unless your preference for not wanting to date trans people stems from some preconceived notion of trans people or hatred towards them) Well people get called transphobic and get hate towards them for saying they would not date a trans person due to personal preference hence the term super straight was made so they dont have to explain themselves and the term can be used to show they can't help how they feel. Then you are saying people who identify as super straight are neo-nazi's... Thats bloody silly. As for super white the fuck does that even mean? Race can't be fluid from what I believe in although I am friends with someone who identifies as "Bi-POC". The neo-nazi and super white comment really devalues your points which is a shame. MsRevine Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] MsRevine wrote:
There are so many labels already why would these be needed... There are 1,392,245,379,452,739,361 (<--- im not fucking kidding btw) labels to possibly identify with. Whats one more in the bunch. Maddox Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Maddox wrote:
Sure there might be some people using it to be transphobic but in theory it’s fine in my eyes, people can be attracted to whatever, same going for what they aren’t attracted to. Sure, it’s not like i think it’s vitally important that a term like this exists, but I don’t see why not and it certainly isn’t transphobic to not be attracted to trans people. Nice to see a different side, I also think its not a major deal in the sense people get so angry over it. I also don't think its important for the term to exist but it does shorten a whole essays worth of explaining into a label which means "my preference is towards cis gendered people". I don't see how/why that has been twisted into hatred towards trans people. In fact I think it is a good term, it means people are accepting a person as trans (like male to female) and regarding them as female but not wanting to date them. If that makes them transphobic well fuck, if you are dating a person of the same race you are also racist blar blar blar. Just causes more divide and UNNEEDED hatred |
|
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: TheFierceOwl
|
orbadoc wrote:
EviIstewie wrote:
I don't see how/why that has been twisted into hatred towards trans people. In fact I think it is a good term, it means people are accepting a person as trans (like male to female) and regarding them as female but not wanting to date them. If that makes them transphobic well fuck If you dont want to date gay men you are also homophobic sorryTbf coda from the amount of stuff I've been labeled as im apparently transphobic, racist, a nazi, fat, alt right, misogynistic, sexist and anti semitic. All of this and now you are telling me im homophobic holy moly Like come on thats a bit much im not fat im just big boned FORGOT TO SAY THAT THIS IS A JOKE!!!!!!!!! |
|
Last Edit: 3 years 1 month ago by Indiana Jones.
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Killa Kappa
|
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] EviIstewie wrote:
The post survived the night! Lets go and from what im seeing no deleted replies, good to see a no hate debate/discussion going well, nice one lads! Replied to a few of you \/ \/ Morgan Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Morgan wrote:
I would not be interested in dating a trans person, does that mean I am super straight? Under the definition of super straight yes you are. PZGrens Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] PZGrens wrote:
I believe that its a product of internalized homophobia/transphobia. Imagine being so insecure in your sexuality that you have to label yourself as "super straight". That being said I am a firm believer that people should be able to identify as whatever they view themselves as internally in order to make themselves feel more comfortable and that extends to people that I disagree with. This comes across as contradicting. Nogtog Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Nogtog wrote:
illegalimmigrant wrote:
narexa wrote:
Yeah but the point is that the term should not exist. Just say you don't want to date trans people for whatever reason that might be without using a ridiculous term that makes you sound like a neo-nazi. What's next? Super White?Morgan wrote:
No it sounds like he's superstraight by definitionI would not be interested in dating a trans person, does that mean I am super straight? No, you're just straight. I personally don't believe it makes you transphobic to not necessarily want to date trans people, (unless your preference for not wanting to date trans people stems from some preconceived notion of trans people or hatred towards them) Well people get called transphobic and get hate towards them for saying they would not date a trans person due to personal preference hence the term super straight was made so they dont have to explain themselves and the term can be used to show they can't help how they feel. Then you are saying people who identify as super straight are neo-nazi's... Thats bloody silly. As for super white the fuck does that even mean? Race can't be fluid from what I believe in although I am friends with someone who identifies as "Bi-POC". The neo-nazi and super white comment really devalues your points which is a shame. MsRevine Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] MsRevine wrote:
There are so many labels already why would these be needed... There are 1,392,245,379,452,739,361 (<--- im not fucking kidding btw) labels to possibly identify with. Whats one more in the bunch. Maddox Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Maddox wrote:
Sure there might be some people using it to be transphobic but in theory it’s fine in my eyes, people can be attracted to whatever, same going for what they aren’t attracted to. Sure, it’s not like i think it’s vitally important that a term like this exists, but I don’t see why not and it certainly isn’t transphobic to not be attracted to trans people. Nice to see a different side, I also think its not a major deal in the sense people get so angry over it. I also don't think its important for the term to exist but it does shorten a whole essays worth of explaining into a label which means "my preference is towards cis gendered people". I don't see how/why that has been twisted into hatred towards trans people. In fact I think it is a good term, it means people are accepting a person as trans (like male to female) and regarding them as female but not wanting to date them. If that makes them transphobic well fuck, if you are dating a person of the same race you are also racist blar blar blar. Just causes more divide and UNNEEDED hatred Ngl i was rly tired when i posted that and sound like a fucking moron. I'm saying that referring to yourself as "super straight" makes you sound more transphobic than if you just say you don't want to date a trans person. By labelling yourself as super straight that's just unnecessary hate that you'll be getting. Like other people have said there are tons of different genders and everything and why is this term only being made now? In my opinion (which does not matter) it's just not needed to have a whole new term for people who don't want to date trans people, especially with the implications of calling yourself "super straight" (just sounds kinda bad) My point with the super white thing (which was fucking stupid with hindsight) was to do with people who wouldn't date black people for example, which doesn't make them racist. If you used such a term for your attraction towards race, it just sounds racist even though it wouldn't be, so why would you use it? |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
All these categories to define what kind of hole you like
|
|
Last Edit: 3 years 1 month ago by Gin.
The topic has been locked.
|
Nogtog wrote:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] EviIstewie wrote:
The post survived the night! Lets go and from what im seeing no deleted replies, good to see a no hate debate/discussion going well, nice one lads! Replied to a few of you \/ \/ Morgan Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Morgan wrote:
I would not be interested in dating a trans person, does that mean I am super straight? Under the definition of super straight yes you are. PZGrens Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] PZGrens wrote:
I believe that its a product of internalized homophobia/transphobia. Imagine being so insecure in your sexuality that you have to label yourself as "super straight". That being said I am a firm believer that people should be able to identify as whatever they view themselves as internally in order to make themselves feel more comfortable and that extends to people that I disagree with. This comes across as contradicting. Nogtog Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Nogtog wrote:
illegalimmigrant wrote:
narexa wrote:
Yeah but the point is that the term should not exist. Just say you don't want to date trans people for whatever reason that might be without using a ridiculous term that makes you sound like a neo-nazi. What's next? Super White?Morgan wrote:
No it sounds like he's superstraight by definitionI would not be interested in dating a trans person, does that mean I am super straight? No, you're just straight. I personally don't believe it makes you transphobic to not necessarily want to date trans people, (unless your preference for not wanting to date trans people stems from some preconceived notion of trans people or hatred towards them) Well people get called transphobic and get hate towards them for saying they would not date a trans person due to personal preference hence the term super straight was made so they dont have to explain themselves and the term can be used to show they can't help how they feel. Then you are saying people who identify as super straight are neo-nazi's... Thats bloody silly. As for super white the fuck does that even mean? Race can't be fluid from what I believe in although I am friends with someone who identifies as "Bi-POC". The neo-nazi and super white comment really devalues your points which is a shame. MsRevine Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] MsRevine wrote:
There are so many labels already why would these be needed... There are 1,392,245,379,452,739,361 (<--- im not fucking kidding btw) labels to possibly identify with. Whats one more in the bunch. Maddox Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Maddox wrote:
Sure there might be some people using it to be transphobic but in theory it’s fine in my eyes, people can be attracted to whatever, same going for what they aren’t attracted to. Sure, it’s not like i think it’s vitally important that a term like this exists, but I don’t see why not and it certainly isn’t transphobic to not be attracted to trans people. Nice to see a different side, I also think its not a major deal in the sense people get so angry over it. I also don't think its important for the term to exist but it does shorten a whole essays worth of explaining into a label which means "my preference is towards cis gendered people". I don't see how/why that has been twisted into hatred towards trans people. In fact I think it is a good term, it means people are accepting a person as trans (like male to female) and regarding them as female but not wanting to date them. If that makes them transphobic well fuck, if you are dating a person of the same race you are also racist blar blar blar. Just causes more divide and UNNEEDED hatred Ngl i was rly tired when i posted that and sound like a fucking moron. I'm saying that referring to yourself as "super straight" makes you sound more transphobic than if you just say you don't want to date a trans person. By labelling yourself as super straight that's just unnecessary hate that you'll be getting. Like other people have said there are tons of different genders and everything and why is this term only being made now? In my opinion (which does not matter) it's just not needed to have a whole new term for people who don't want to date trans people, especially with the implications of calling yourself "super straight" (just sounds kinda bad) My point with the super white thing (which was fucking stupid with hindsight) was to do with people who wouldn't date black people for example, which doesn't make them racist. If you used such a term for your attraction towards race, it just sounds racist even though it wouldn't be, so why would you use it? First off the term racist has been so over fucking used its lost all meaning, you got a 13 year old who dropped the nword instantly put in the same category as the scummy fucks in the KKK who lynch, burn and over all are just fucking disgusting people. And to be fair the term transphobic is over used, you can not want to date a trans person and get compared and put in the same category as someone who truly hates trans people (again those people are fucking idiots). Hence the term was made to show preferences from birth that they have no control over in the same way gay people are, or bi people or well how everyone can not control preferences |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
Gin wrote:
All these categories to define what kind of hole you like
excuse me, sir I only date pint sized cans of warm dark fruits that have been left in a car in direct sunlight for 8 hours. If i were to come back and find a hole in my can id be fucking fuming ngl chief |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
Wild but if you ignore it it doesn't exist outside of small circles
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
0ctocat wrote:
Wild but if you ignore it it doesn't exist outside of small circles Probs the best answer I have ever seen that can be related to literally everything. Gonna steal this lmao |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
orbadoc wrote:
EviIstewie wrote:
and if you date gay men you are a sexist sorry I don't see how/why that has been twisted into hatred towards trans people. In fact I think it is a good term, it means people are accepting a person as trans (like male to female) and regarding them as female but not wanting to date them. If that makes them transphobic well fuck If you dont want to date gay men you are also homophobic sorry |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
It was literally made by 4chan neonazis
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
Markus wrote:
It was literally made by 4chan neonazis lol as if the current state of 4chan could think of something like this, also jannies would just remove it. |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
Nogtog wrote:
illegalimmigrant wrote:
narexa wrote:
Yeah but the point is that the term should not exist. Just say you don't want to date trans people for whatever reason that might be without using a ridiculous term that makes you sound like a neo-nazi. What's next? Super White?Morgan wrote:
No it sounds like he's superstraight by definitionI would not be interested in dating a trans person, does that mean I am super straight? No, you're just straight. I personally don't believe it makes you transphobic to not necessarily want to date trans people, (unless your preference for not wanting to date trans people stems from some preconceived notion of trans people or hatred towards them) Didn’t take long at all for someone to make it a race issue |
|
Last Edit: 3 years 1 month ago by Nafe.
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Indiana Jones, Sup bitch
|
Everybody seems to have forgotten about Super Man, what about him hmmm?
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
Seems like bait
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
This just seems like fake conflict made by the ruling class to distract us from the real enemies, the french.
|
|
Studio Banter wrote:
Mage you will always be remembered as the first person to write a fuck you list on Zarp and a bonus for not getting it deleted.
Last Edit: 3 years 1 month ago by Jeppe.
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: luke_, Indiana Jones, narexa, Sup bitch, MsRevine and 3 more...
|
CEO of Business wrote:
Seems like bait Then why would I respond to people. Oh thats it, to have a discussion |
|
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Sup bitch
|
EviIstewie wrote:
CEO of Business wrote:
No, I didn't mean you're trying to bait people. I mean the concept seems like bait to get an angry response from people who are in the LGBTQ community. Seems like bait Then why would I respond to people. Oh thats it, to have a discussion |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
CEO of Business wrote:
EviIstewie wrote:
CEO of Business wrote:
No, I didn't mean you're trying to bait people. I mean the concept seems like bait to get an angry response from people who are in the LGBTQ community.Seems like bait Then why would I respond to people. Oh thats it, to have a discussion Ah gotcha, yea I did list it as to be a piss take which I guess would be classed as baiting them into outrage. |
|
Last Edit: 3 years 1 month ago by Indiana Jones. Reason: That was rude of me
The topic has been locked.
|
EviIstewie wrote:
Nogtog wrote:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] EviIstewie wrote:
The post survived the night! Lets go and from what im seeing no deleted replies, good to see a no hate debate/discussion going well, nice one lads! Replied to a few of you \/ \/ Morgan Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Morgan wrote:
I would not be interested in dating a trans person, does that mean I am super straight? Under the definition of super straight yes you are. PZGrens Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] PZGrens wrote:
I believe that its a product of internalized homophobia/transphobia. Imagine being so insecure in your sexuality that you have to label yourself as "super straight". That being said I am a firm believer that people should be able to identify as whatever they view themselves as internally in order to make themselves feel more comfortable and that extends to people that I disagree with. This comes across as contradicting. Nogtog Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Nogtog wrote:
illegalimmigrant wrote:
narexa wrote:
Yeah but the point is that the term should not exist. Just say you don't want to date trans people for whatever reason that might be without using a ridiculous term that makes you sound like a neo-nazi. What's next? Super White?Morgan wrote:
No it sounds like he's superstraight by definitionI would not be interested in dating a trans person, does that mean I am super straight? No, you're just straight. I personally don't believe it makes you transphobic to not necessarily want to date trans people, (unless your preference for not wanting to date trans people stems from some preconceived notion of trans people or hatred towards them) Well people get called transphobic and get hate towards them for saying they would not date a trans person due to personal preference hence the term super straight was made so they dont have to explain themselves and the term can be used to show they can't help how they feel. Then you are saying people who identify as super straight are neo-nazi's... Thats bloody silly. As for super white the fuck does that even mean? Race can't be fluid from what I believe in although I am friends with someone who identifies as "Bi-POC". The neo-nazi and super white comment really devalues your points which is a shame. MsRevine Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] MsRevine wrote:
There are so many labels already why would these be needed... There are 1,392,245,379,452,739,361 (<--- im not fucking kidding btw) labels to possibly identify with. Whats one more in the bunch. Maddox Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Maddox wrote:
Sure there might be some people using it to be transphobic but in theory it’s fine in my eyes, people can be attracted to whatever, same going for what they aren’t attracted to. Sure, it’s not like i think it’s vitally important that a term like this exists, but I don’t see why not and it certainly isn’t transphobic to not be attracted to trans people. Nice to see a different side, I also think its not a major deal in the sense people get so angry over it. I also don't think its important for the term to exist but it does shorten a whole essays worth of explaining into a label which means "my preference is towards cis gendered people". I don't see how/why that has been twisted into hatred towards trans people. In fact I think it is a good term, it means people are accepting a person as trans (like male to female) and regarding them as female but not wanting to date them. If that makes them transphobic well fuck, if you are dating a person of the same race you are also racist blar blar blar. Just causes more divide and UNNEEDED hatred Ngl i was rly tired when i posted that and sound like a fucking moron. I'm saying that referring to yourself as "super straight" makes you sound more transphobic than if you just say you don't want to date a trans person. By labelling yourself as super straight that's just unnecessary hate that you'll be getting. Like other people have said there are tons of different genders and everything and why is this term only being made now? In my opinion (which does not matter) it's just not needed to have a whole new term for people who don't want to date trans people, especially with the implications of calling yourself "super straight" (just sounds kinda bad) My point with the super white thing (which was fucking stupid with hindsight) was to do with people who wouldn't date black people for example, which doesn't make them racist. If you used such a term for your attraction towards race, it just sounds racist even though it wouldn't be, so why would you use it? First off the term racist has been so over fucking used its lost all meaning, you got a 13 year old who dropped the nword instantly put in the same category as the scummy fucks in the KKK who lynch, burn and over all are just fucking disgusting people. And to be fair the term transphobic is over used, you can not want to date a trans person and get compared and put in the same category as someone who truly hates trans people (again those people are fucking idiots). Hence the term was made to show preferences from birth that they have no control over in the same way gay people are, or bi people or well how everyone can not control preferences Adding race to the mix is a silly argument, but on the topic of it being transpohic, it's such a small minority of people that believe not necessarily wanting to date a trans person is transphobic, there are definitely transphobic ways to go about it and to portray your disinterest in trans people but I feel like people get so worked up over the minority opinion and take that as if all trans people think like that and are that extreme, people just aren't actually like that, that shits just twitter. |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
narexa wrote:
EviIstewie wrote:
Nogtog wrote:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] EviIstewie wrote:
The post survived the night! Lets go and from what im seeing no deleted replies, good to see a no hate debate/discussion going well, nice one lads! Replied to a few of you \/ \/ Morgan Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Morgan wrote:
I would not be interested in dating a trans person, does that mean I am super straight? Under the definition of super straight yes you are. PZGrens Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] PZGrens wrote:
I believe that its a product of internalized homophobia/transphobia. Imagine being so insecure in your sexuality that you have to label yourself as "super straight". That being said I am a firm believer that people should be able to identify as whatever they view themselves as internally in order to make themselves feel more comfortable and that extends to people that I disagree with. This comes across as contradicting. Nogtog Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Nogtog wrote:
illegalimmigrant wrote:
narexa wrote:
Yeah but the point is that the term should not exist. Just say you don't want to date trans people for whatever reason that might be without using a ridiculous term that makes you sound like a neo-nazi. What's next? Super White?Morgan wrote:
No it sounds like he's superstraight by definitionI would not be interested in dating a trans person, does that mean I am super straight? No, you're just straight. I personally don't believe it makes you transphobic to not necessarily want to date trans people, (unless your preference for not wanting to date trans people stems from some preconceived notion of trans people or hatred towards them) Well people get called transphobic and get hate towards them for saying they would not date a trans person due to personal preference hence the term super straight was made so they dont have to explain themselves and the term can be used to show they can't help how they feel. Then you are saying people who identify as super straight are neo-nazi's... Thats bloody silly. As for super white the fuck does that even mean? Race can't be fluid from what I believe in although I am friends with someone who identifies as "Bi-POC". The neo-nazi and super white comment really devalues your points which is a shame. MsRevine Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] MsRevine wrote:
There are so many labels already why would these be needed... There are 1,392,245,379,452,739,361 (<--- im not fucking kidding btw) labels to possibly identify with. Whats one more in the bunch. Maddox Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] Maddox wrote:
Sure there might be some people using it to be transphobic but in theory it’s fine in my eyes, people can be attracted to whatever, same going for what they aren’t attracted to. Sure, it’s not like i think it’s vitally important that a term like this exists, but I don’t see why not and it certainly isn’t transphobic to not be attracted to trans people. Nice to see a different side, I also think its not a major deal in the sense people get so angry over it. I also don't think its important for the term to exist but it does shorten a whole essays worth of explaining into a label which means "my preference is towards cis gendered people". I don't see how/why that has been twisted into hatred towards trans people. In fact I think it is a good term, it means people are accepting a person as trans (like male to female) and regarding them as female but not wanting to date them. If that makes them transphobic well fuck, if you are dating a person of the same race you are also racist blar blar blar. Just causes more divide and UNNEEDED hatred Ngl i was rly tired when i posted that and sound like a fucking moron. I'm saying that referring to yourself as "super straight" makes you sound more transphobic than if you just say you don't want to date a trans person. By labelling yourself as super straight that's just unnecessary hate that you'll be getting. Like other people have said there are tons of different genders and everything and why is this term only being made now? In my opinion (which does not matter) it's just not needed to have a whole new term for people who don't want to date trans people, especially with the implications of calling yourself "super straight" (just sounds kinda bad) My point with the super white thing (which was fucking stupid with hindsight) was to do with people who wouldn't date black people for example, which doesn't make them racist. If you used such a term for your attraction towards race, it just sounds racist even though it wouldn't be, so why would you use it? First off the term racist has been so over fucking used its lost all meaning, you got a 13 year old who dropped the nword instantly put in the same category as the scummy fucks in the KKK who lynch, burn and over all are just fucking disgusting people. And to be fair the term transphobic is over used, you can not want to date a trans person and get compared and put in the same category as someone who truly hates trans people (again those people are fucking idiots). Hence the term was made to show preferences from birth that they have no control over in the same way gay people are, or bi people or well how everyone can not control preferences Adding race to the mix is a silly argument, but on the topic of it being transpohic, it's such a small minority of people that believe not necessarily wanting to date a trans person is transphobic, there are definitely transphobic ways to go about it and to portray your disinterest in trans people but I feel like people get so worked up over the minority opinion and take that as if all trans people think like that and are that extreme, people just aren't actually like that, that shits just twitter. On the flip side a minority of people are actually racist/transphobic/neonazi etc but it seems everyone gets grouped from either side. You are far left or far right blah blah blah. |
|
The topic has been locked.
|