Morgan wrote:
Under the definition of super straight yes you are.

PZGrens wrote:
This comes across as contradicting.

Nogtog wrote:
Well people get called transphobic and get hate towards them for saying they would not date a trans person due to personal preference hence the term super straight was made so they dont have to explain themselves and the term can be used to show they can't help how they feel. Then you are saying people who identify as super straight are neo-nazi's... Thats bloody silly. As for super white the fuck does that even mean? Race can't be fluid from what I believe in although I am friends with someone who identifies as "Bi-POC". The neo-nazi and super white comment really devalues your points which is a shame.

MsRevine wrote:
There are 1,392,245,379,452,739,361 (<--- im not fucking kidding btw) labels to possibly identify with. Whats one more in the bunch.

Maddox wrote:
Nice to see a different side, I also think its not a major deal in the sense people get so angry over it. I also don't think its important for the term to exist but it does shorten a whole essays worth of explaining into a label which means "my preference is towards cis gendered people". I don't see how/why that has been twisted into hatred towards trans people. In fact I think it is a good term, it means people are accepting a person as trans (like male to female) and regarding them as female but not wanting to date them. If that makes them transphobic well fuck, if you are dating a person of the same race you are also racist blar blar blar. Just causes more divide and UNNEEDED hatred