Quimoth wrote:
I've seen cases where they were and not punished. But fine, lets go all double standard, not like I'm expecting anything else.
Self-defense isn't sufficient to kill your T-buddy for if he violates rule 1.8 twice and you dont want to wait for him to keep telling the innocents where you are.
But just scrap rule 1.8 if you're violating it yourselves all the time and use that as an argument to keep saying i was wrong to kill the griefer.
"were and were not punished" Ok, Maybe they got a verbal, maybe they got forgiven or maybe the person just didn't care enough to report it, It has nothing to do with staff suddenly deciding they favourited that person and didn't want to punish them.
as for "Self-defence" self defence would be if he attacked you, Giving your location is not a valid reason to kill them as stated you could have dropped a little message to the staff online explaining the situation and got the other traitor muted, the issue being you didn't and that you killed them.
now for the point where you're stating staff violating rule 1.8 themselves, Gather some evidence and report it, Cause damn this is the first I've heard about it.
and just going to say this again
If you want this report/appeal taken seriously please add the template, otherwise it will get closed and declined.