Quimoth wrote:
I've seen cases where they were and not punished. But fine, lets go all double standard, not like I'm expecting anything else.
Self-defense isn't sufficient to kill your T-buddy for if he violates rule 1.8 twice and you dont want to wait for him to keep telling the innocents where you are.
But just scrap rule 1.8 if you're violating it yourselves all the time and use that as an argument to keep saying i was wrong to kill the griefer.
You are only making this more difficult. Punishments are at staff's discretion that is likely why you see a double standard. Had you appealed this and said yeah I broke a rule but it was in self defense he defibbed a innocent and was calling us out etc etc. A staff member would have one hundred percent accepted this. Instead someone made a post you did not like and decided to go around calling us hypocrites and idiots. Half of this stuff you are complaining about is not even control of the people you are trash talking. We told you four times what he did was a rule break and you could have reported him by now and got him punished AND got your warning removed. Instead you insist on trying to argue with staff. A rule break is a rule break. Rule breaking does not beget a rule breaking response. That is the way it is like it or not.