TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] Walter White's Application

Good guy
Knows the rules

khaitam2001 wrote: Sure, when someone breaks some minor rules and they usually never do I can look past it and maybe support them getting a staff position. Hacking and using exploits as a staff member are a totally different situation imo. As a staff member you're supposed to uphold and respect the rules while representing the community itself, hopefully in a positive way. Staff members are supposed to be good examples of how to act while playing our servers. If Walter was serious and wanted to spend a long time in the community while being a staff member he wouldn't have hacked, exploited, or gone to make his own community. There's plenty of candidates with clean(er) records that deserve the position more.
Walter HWITE wrote: This is gold.

Viking wrote:
I did not hack when I was a staff member.

Walter HWITE wrote: I only meant you had exploited when you were staff. Either way, hacking is hacking.

@Viking I agree I shouldn't have done those

Viking, the past is the past. Let it go already, others have, why can't you?
Although he shouldn't of done those things, many people do things like that and are forgiven. Walter is a great guy man, you can't hold this back on him.

Nade Jones wrote:
If Viking doesn't want to forgive him yet then that is not something that you should be complaining about, if walter accepts what he has done wrong then he should also be accepting the fact that some people will never forgive him for it.

Nade thanks for backing me up but Sonzy is right let them think/do/write what they want to man we can't force someone to forgive me or something but anyways thanks guys,please do not argue :>

Nade Jones wrote: When I'm home from school for the summer I'd love to play on the server with Walter and get to know him better, I'm sure he is a great guy. Does that mean he's deserving of staff though?

What kind of an example is set when someone hacks, exploits as a staff member in the past, leaves the community to make his own, and then comes back asking for the same level of trust and we give it to him. Not to mention the application itself, which has a why you section that barely gets by at 144 words and seems roughly thrown together with little to no effort put into it (could be a language thing, if that's the case I apologize and the last sentence can be disregarded).

We shouldn't set the precedent that you can do whatever you please and if you do something bad all we need is an apology and we forget all about it.