TOPIC: Ban Request & Compensation Request

So, I told James Stone that I'm going to give him my base dupe for 380k. He said he will give me the cash after I give him the base dupe and after I gave him the dupe this is what he said:
steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=443921123
steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=443921210

P.S. He's in my gang.

I don't see the problem.

Scamming in-game is allowed, but however i will refund you the amount of $380,000 in-game cash from my own money.

Denied

Thank you so much Pred. Appreciate it.

LoadingPixels wrote:
This what happens when you have someone else's darkrp signature Bilbo!

This server does allow you to scam each other as it is allowed

Yeah, I knew that already, but he was a gang member from my gang, so I thought that might change the story.

Technically, the player has still broken the rules. He is a police officer, and the rules for that job state that they are there solely to keep the streets free of crime. That means that he should never have been in a position to scam another citizen, as that is a criminal act in its self.



I would like this to be revisited.

Chris wrote: First of all the printer safe is disconnected props. Second of all there is no proof of him giving the money, neither being scammed. Aka the rulebreak itself. Its only chat logs, it is lack of evidence for both the rulebreak and the money lost. Im just trying to be nice and give him money from my own wallet.

Bilbo Swaggins wrote:
You have a duty to actually investigate it, you know. Just because the only evidence he has given hasn't tickled your fancy, doesn't mean that it can simply be shunned.

You should at least make the effort to talk to the accused about what happened; it's not like he hasn't tried to prove it.

Chris wrote: Something you must understand chris, what is being written here isnt everything that happens. You literally have 0 clue what i have investigated and what i havent.

Bilbo Swaggins wrote:
All you've said is that there's no proof. I'm not a mind reader.

This request summed up.
Template? : No
Proof of steam id? : No
Proof of actual rulebreak/ offense : No
Proof of owning the pronter safe : No, it clearly says disconnected player props, there is no way it actually is his.
Proof of anything at all? : No. It seems to me hes trying to rip us off with his friend pretending he got scammed with this disconnected player props safe. Anyway i still try to offer him a refund to make sure he has a good experience at zarp

Conclusion : Denied.
You must understand that you cant expect staff members do actually investigate some deep shit to find a little bit of information that might not help you at all. I hope this also gAve you a better understanding of my conclusion

Bilbo Swaggins wrote:
You've resorted to the excuse of the template/steamid, which is fine - automatic denial (you could have said this was the reason before), but still the evidence shows a player telling another player that he scammed him, which to me makes it a more likely case than anything (your theory of 'his friend was helping him' doesn't really add up to me, because he'd be getting his friend punished).

You've also made quite a significant accusation there which is really not called for.

I havent accused anyone, im just telling my point of view.

TIME TO LOCK THIS QUICKLY

And also how can you expect me to punish someone when they got no evidence on who actually wrote it?

Bilbo Swaggins wrote:
It is your point of view, you're right; but it carries an accusation which is a bit far - you say you don't have enough evidence to deal with it, but at the same time you don't really have the evidence to have that opinion.

This is just going around in circles. I love you like Farage. Argument over, you denied it because it didn't use the template

Ive denied it for the reasons as stated before.

Pred, I can show you the whole console chat if you want. I know that doesn't change anything, but it will give a-bit of more proof and evidence.