Luek wrote:
Justice wrote:
Luek wrote:
Justice wrote:
Mattors wrote:
Luek wrote:
Markus Chellwigg wrote:
I thought admins were meant to avoid raiding bases after they had received info on it from administrative duties?
i dont see how mix3rz received any info from administrative duties here
he knew that the player wouldn't be allowed back due to NLR no?
i didn't even think of that. a clear conflict of interest.
usually "info from administrative duties" refers to when staff teleport inside for a sit then raid like 5 min after. I don't think you gain much by removing a player (outside) that is breaking NLR. But im not sure why mix3rz killed him
I was online at the time. The player was inside of the building then taken outside and dragged away (the user seems to have only got their recording software up after being taken outside though), but I didn't know where to until I saw the video. The raid seems to have begun almost immediately, not even 5 minutes later which you describe as suitable. I hope people put their biases aside and actually think logically about this and realize how toxic this admin was to this fairly inexperienced player for no good reason at all.
Not one person mentions that he was dragged from out of his base then raided, you also seem to be making this situation sound like he abused so hard he teleported everyone into one spot and gluoned them. All he did was remove someone outside of the district for breaking NLR, they were both outside. Why he killed him upon return I don’t know, but saying the admin was toxic is bullshit, I don’t see any toxicity from him whatsoever and if you think I’m being bias you may just be confused. If I were in mix3rz’ situation I would’ve done the same thing, remove the player from the district and upon return I would just warned him. The player clearly knew why he was moved yet came back anyways, I don’t think mix3rz should’ve killed him but he surly didn’t mass abuse his powers in a toxic manner like you’re describing.
The player said they were pulled away from his base and I also saw it in-game. The player explained why NLR didn't really apply, and then he was killed by the admin and his base was destroyed. It almost looks like a revenge attack on a player - they had a valid reason for 'breaking' NLR, so intead of doing the wanted punishment of a warn, he instead decided to destroy all of the player's items and base. Instead of being sympathetic or talking with the user further, they just said "welcome to darkrp" (as you can see in the chat log in the screenshot), and then in-game further insulted them and said they won't get any of their items back again, even if he was punished for what he did. I was in-game so I saw a lot more, so that may explain my negative stance even moreso. Mix3rz also accused the users of having an invalid/rule-breaking base which warranted its destruction, but Nikoo himself checked the base and said the base was fine and met all the rules. He was overall very rude to this player. If ZARP wants to keep players it has to not excuse behaviour such as this from admins of all people. If he wanted to handle this sensibly, he would have at least waited 3 minutes so there couldn't be a deemed conflict of interest. It's a complete failure every step of the way.