TOPIC: Andrew Tate Deplatforming

Andrew Tate has been banned off of Instagram and Facebook, apparently he violated their ‘dangerous organisations and individuals’ policy.

Whilst I thought the memes about the guy were fucking annoying and could tell most of what he was saying was satire. I see absolutely no reason anybody should be removed over what he was saying.

I understand that Facebook, Twitter and all these social media conglomerates can do what they want with their platform, but it’s definitely not right.

OPINIONS ZARP?

Andrew Tate got deplatformed after chute refused to sell the rights to gencorp (it would violate the agreement with Peter Jones) and he went and committed mass rdm

Also yea he should be de-platformed lmao he was a massive con artist

i think he got banned because he was bringing back the strong masculinity to modern society

Andrew Tate is my idol

his whole brand is a pyramid scheme pmsl

SorIe wrote:
Stuck in the matrix rslur

PurpleVine FatalCrow wrote: clearly I should pay 50 bucks to promote some random rich guy who hates women

Just gotta take the guy with a grain of salt. He knows exactly what to say to get and stay popular

CEO of Business wrote:
Make sure when you do it to use my link cheers mate.

rroobbiinn10xx wrote:
Stupid children on tiktok don't have the ability to take it with a grain pinch of salt and like everything nower days its all materialistic so they see fast car and BITCHES and want to copy it in every way. The amount of copycats is unreal, granted those same people are fans of IshowSpeeds and his dumb shit

PurpleVine FatalCrow wrote:
what is so dangerous about being materialistic? Every boy has wanted fast cars in his youth. In fact i still do.

rroobbiinn10xx wrote:
I eat air and bow to Buddha

rroobbiinn10xx wrote:
I should have worded it a tad better. I mean he uses materialistic things to con people into his pyramid scheme because of course everyone wants a fast/nice car and shiny things. The dangerous part (from what I see at least) is pushing the idea your value is purely based on what you own. The sad reality is the internet teaches kids more than most parents do nower days so we are gonna have the next generation with warped ideas of self worth. We see it already with young women who have seen/been told that all worth is purely based on looks and nothing else (christ I sound like a white knight fslur don't I). Shits damaging lmao

PurpleVine FatalCrow wrote: what color is your Bugatti

I can tell they were both forced by the misogynism accussation masses. Why would someone be penaltised for expressing their viewpoints? I’d rather neither agree nor disagree with his public statements but i do have to respect his right to express them.

Nafe wrote: Not everyone is too bright and the shit he is/was saying is outright just dangerous and retarded

Life in the big city who cares
its been how many years of people getting banned for having "right wing" (whatever that even means in 2022) opinions.
media companies dont want you to think about anything besides the kardashians and ellen

note: im happy andrew tate got banned and idk if the allegations are true about him but regardless i hope he gets the death penalty for being mentally ill but thats just my opinion

Lewis_is_java wrote: idk what is dumber rn, your take or andrew tates "dangerous" takes
the same can be said for millions of people who have any opinion ever, andrew tate says throw women out of the lambo that you can buy when you take his lessons, The View says slaughter your white neighbors in their front yards then then tell your 6 year old niece shes really a boy, who cares its all reactionary and courting controversy get over it!

Lerpson wrote: Not everyone who has an opinion has a massive audience or platform like he did have, my opinion isn't inspiring the next elliot rodger

It's ironic for meta to ban people like him when their entire business model is based off controversies and negative content to encourage more clicks and revenue but as much as I hate meta zuck , you can't just base this off freedom of expression. Apparently his house in Romania was raided on grounds of human trafficking and the investigation is on-going, on that alone should ring bells, if the south park caricature of a masculine man doesn't cut it. So ye, the dude is a dangerous individual.

but hey that's just my opinion