TOPIC: Staff Consistency

i got permabanned for spawning 5 tables and it was propspam according to some dumb admin so i mean i agree

Ashur wrote: exactly,
I feel like maybe warn appeals should be handled by multiple admin+'s as a group to get a fairer outcome.

If you encounter a policman on the street after driving too fast, he might let you get away with a warning or he might fine you, I think we should trust in the jugdement of our staff members.

Ashur wrote: We all know thats not what happened

zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/general-d...335-zarp-staff-ethos
zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/appeals/5...olicy-handling-guide

These exist for a very good reason

Jamez wrote: There is a reason why you can chose which staff member(s) you want to potentially handle your appeal/abuse report

Nick0GR wrote:
You can't choose someone to handle it, but you can say people that you do not want to handle it:

Good Point, what's your solution to it though?

TheXnator wrote:
Ok sure, but when staff members break the ethos or handle it awkward nothing happens. Its like a slap on the wrist then they do it again.

I agree yes

Aqua wrote:
Something does happen. The staff member in question, if he is actually guilty of mishandling, is told to come and has a small meeting with a higher-ranked staff member to be reminded of how to do his job. If he doesn't take that into consideration and repeatedly breaks ethos or the policies he must follow, he is then put on judgement weather or not he should be demoted.

Zarp doesn't want to just demote people left and right for one case, you know that.

I didn't mean that staff members could be biased towards certain users, I just feel that if there was a range of admin+'s handling together and making a vote for accepted/denied, it would be a better and fairer outcome as there is a variety of judgements towards the situation.

OTheXnator wrote: Think you’ll find some people have gotten away with - “I only want Chute or CM to handle this”

Svanzscape wrote:
Staff members break ethos all the time. Guess what happens to them? Nothing. Im not against them breaking ethos but it sure as hell is annoying

CrankyBot wrote: I mean if you were really persistent you could simply name every staff member that isn't the one you want to handle it and say they can't handle it.

I feel like most Staff literally are not fit for the job - so why volunteer?

Reputation and in-game advantages such as more 'friends' or even abuse, also less rulebreaks committed towards them.

95% of the staff team need to be demoted, including the ones that don't have the motivation to do their jobs anymore because of how poor the 'team' is (me).

It's the best method, all staff should be able to use their own discretion when giving out punishments. The other side of the coin would have a list of rulebreaks and punishments that have to be given out for them, but not only would it contradict the ethos and policies, players would also be complaining about them getting a harsh punishment for a small mistake and how it was "unfair".

Stoned wrote: Wtf you want us to accept all first warn appeals? xD

Morgan wrote: Y'know what we really need Morgan? The Task Force System will solve all our problems!