Login to ZARP
|
Sada wrote:
Nick0GR wrote:
No? TheCorgi wrote:
The Gamer Guy wrote:
As much as i agree with you corgi in that onion did nothing wrong please do remember onion is allowed to defend himself you going to this much length to defend onion to me seems like you're trying to suck up to a lead team member.TheCorgi wrote:
Ashy wrote:
TheCorgi wrote:
Ashy wrote:
So you're saying you'll believe anybody that says "I didn't see it?"TheCorgi wrote:
![]() Onion says he didnt see your f1.. making it a non legit sit.. (hence the fucking around). Was also undercover doing junk. I trust him. Well I don't ACTUALLY know what Onion saw. If he says he didn't see it, well then m8 he didn't see it. His word against Gamer's word. How else to explain it other than that? Unless there's clear evidence from both sides that shows the full event, I'm going to take the admins word for it and TRUST that he is being valid and worthy of that title. I'm going to put TRUST into someone who has gained their rank through it. Onion may have not acted appropriately but why should I believe such a one sided story so quickly. I have heard both sides to this argument and choose to trust Onion on what he says. You're going to take his side just because he's staff? What's wrong with you? I have earnt a staff rank many times and have held it for very long times, I only recently resigned so does that mean I am less trustworthy? Sorry that I put trust into those that are in charge and deserving of it..? Am I.... not supposed... to trust staff members? I'm taking his side because I actually spoke to Onion. I got his side of the story. That's why I'm taking his side. You're not any less trustworthy if you resigned. I'm just saying I trust him because I asked him about the situation and he told me what had happened. isnt that how you got your ranks? |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
Nick0GR wrote:
Sada wrote:
Nick0GR wrote:
No?TheCorgi wrote:
The Gamer Guy wrote:
As much as i agree with you corgi in that onion did nothing wrong please do remember onion is allowed to defend himself you going to this much length to defend onion to me seems like you're trying to suck up to a lead team member.TheCorgi wrote:
Ashy wrote:
TheCorgi wrote:
Ashy wrote:
So you're saying you'll believe anybody that says "I didn't see it?"TheCorgi wrote:
![]() Onion says he didnt see your f1.. making it a non legit sit.. (hence the fucking around). Was also undercover doing junk. I trust him. Well I don't ACTUALLY know what Onion saw. If he says he didn't see it, well then m8 he didn't see it. His word against Gamer's word. How else to explain it other than that? Unless there's clear evidence from both sides that shows the full event, I'm going to take the admins word for it and TRUST that he is being valid and worthy of that title. I'm going to put TRUST into someone who has gained their rank through it. Onion may have not acted appropriately but why should I believe such a one sided story so quickly. I have heard both sides to this argument and choose to trust Onion on what he says. You're going to take his side just because he's staff? What's wrong with you? I have earnt a staff rank many times and have held it for very long times, I only recently resigned so does that mean I am less trustworthy? Sorry that I put trust into those that are in charge and deserving of it..? Am I.... not supposed... to trust staff members? I'm taking his side because I actually spoke to Onion. I got his side of the story. That's why I'm taking his side. You're not any less trustworthy if you resigned. I'm just saying I trust him because I asked him about the situation and he told me what had happened. isnt that how you got your ranks? yes |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
Pegasus wrote:
Guys how about we wait and let the CM Team decide, as far as I am aware they are in a spacer right now so let's give our keyboards a little rest and trust in our Community Team to reach the right decision. Knowing Chute they're probably playing CS:GO in there. |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
Raeker wrote:
Pegasus wrote:
Shh keep up the proffesional fasade! Guys how about we wait and let the CM Team decide, as far as I am aware they are in a spacer right now so let's give our keyboards a little rest and trust in our Community Team to reach the right decision. Knowing Chute they're probably playing CS:GO in there. |
|
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker
|
who cares its Onion !
![]() |
|
Nothing
The topic has been locked.
|
Sada wrote:
Nick0GR wrote:
Sada wrote:
Nick0GR wrote:
No?TheCorgi wrote:
The Gamer Guy wrote:
As much as i agree with you corgi in that onion did nothing wrong please do remember onion is allowed to defend himself you going to this much length to defend onion to me seems like you're trying to suck up to a lead team member.TheCorgi wrote:
Ashy wrote:
TheCorgi wrote:
Ashy wrote:
So you're saying you'll believe anybody that says "I didn't see it?"TheCorgi wrote:
![]() Onion says he didnt see your f1.. making it a non legit sit.. (hence the fucking around). Was also undercover doing junk. I trust him. Well I don't ACTUALLY know what Onion saw. If he says he didn't see it, well then m8 he didn't see it. His word against Gamer's word. How else to explain it other than that? Unless there's clear evidence from both sides that shows the full event, I'm going to take the admins word for it and TRUST that he is being valid and worthy of that title. I'm going to put TRUST into someone who has gained their rank through it. Onion may have not acted appropriately but why should I believe such a one sided story so quickly. I have heard both sides to this argument and choose to trust Onion on what he says. You're going to take his side just because he's staff? What's wrong with you? I have earnt a staff rank many times and have held it for very long times, I only recently resigned so does that mean I am less trustworthy? Sorry that I put trust into those that are in charge and deserving of it..? Am I.... not supposed... to trust staff members? I'm taking his side because I actually spoke to Onion. I got his side of the story. That's why I'm taking his side. You're not any less trustworthy if you resigned. I'm just saying I trust him because I asked him about the situation and he told me what had happened. isnt that how you got your ranks? yes |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
MsMs wrote:
who cares its Onion ! ![]() I care he bad staff |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
TheXnator wrote:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] TheCorgi wrote:
The Gamer Guy wrote:
TheCorgi wrote:
Ashy wrote:
TheCorgi wrote:
Ashy wrote:
So you're saying you'll believe anybody that says "I didn't see it?"TheCorgi wrote:
![]() Onion says he didnt see your f1.. making it a non legit sit.. (hence the fucking around). Was also undercover doing junk. I trust him. Well I don't ACTUALLY know what Onion saw. If he says he didn't see it, well then m8 he didn't see it. His word against Gamer's word. How else to explain it other than that? Unless there's clear evidence from both sides that shows the full event, I'm going to take the admins word for it and TRUST that he is being valid and worthy of that title. I'm going to put TRUST into someone who has gained their rank through it. Onion may have not acted appropriately but why should I believe such a one sided story so quickly. I have heard both sides to this argument and choose to trust Onion on what he says. You're going to take his side just because he's staff? What's wrong with you? I have earnt a staff rank many times and have held it for very long times, I only recently resigned so does that mean I am less trustworthy? Sorry that I put trust into those that are in charge and deserving of it..? Am I.... not supposed... to trust staff members? I'm taking his side because I actually spoke to Onion. I got his side of the story. That's why I'm taking his side. You're not any less trustworthy if you resigned. I'm just saying I trust him because I asked him about the situation and he told me what had happened. As Corgi has said, the user who is being reported's word will always be taken above your word if you are unable to provide any clear evidence. Onion is innocent until proven guilty, and you are unable to actually prove that he is guilty, so I sincerely doubt that this report will / should be accepted. If you need Onion desperately, then he isalmost always available on Teamspeak, along with many other LT members, or you can message him on Steam in order to see if he is available or genuinely busy with something. (In regards to the ignoring part, I haven't looked over the way he behaved part, just replying to this string of replies) What do I not have proof of? You can clearly see that he was messing around in the sky and that he lied about not having a rank along with me asking him for help multiple times even by going up to him and still being ignored. |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
Hello Gamer Guy,
We have now spoken to Onion Rings about this situation and it seems like in this case unfortunately he did not see your F1 request, and neither was he able to confirm the rule breaks that may have occured in the Bank because he respawned immediately after dying. In terms of the rest of the sit there's always going to be times when staff aren't having the best day and don't handle sits as incredibly as they usually always do. On that note no further action is necessary, but we will always try to do better in this regards. |
|
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: OnionRings, Raeker
|