|
Login to ZARP
|
TOPIC: Why Admins never cares complicated problems
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226606
|
Lewis_is_java wrote:
Gin wrote:
Now things are flying over your head, karen.Maddox wrote:
You're missing the point and everything is flying over your head keep all the salt out of that main dish, all poogle had to do is exactly what the super admin did that you keep refering to and explain the situation to the user and why he could not handle the situation instead of saying "idk", this is the lack of ability to handle the situation which would be quite clearly frustrating to any user.Gin wrote:
Man here you go again with the intellectual responsesSorry if I came across harsh I didnt mean to and I personally don't feel I was harsh with you , but my issue again isn't with you but your ability to deal with these situations with the rank you'reapplying for I'm sure you do lots but from this and what I've read I was just curious for your side and opinion as from what I recall this role is reserved for very dedicated people who have earned it Again, Like I said, A super admin (the rank he is applying for!!!!!!) said the same thing as me and poogleJust scroll back, the dudes name is Mattors, like i said in my earlier post If you weren't there, how can you claim the admin didn't do anything to resolve the situation? You're former staff, you know a lot of users, mostly newcomers, get salty when an rdm situation can't be dealt with properly. Let me cook up a more realistic scenario with imagination as the main dish with some staffing experience on the side: The user was pissed when things didn't go their way and blamed staff even though they did all they could. Hes using ADMINS as in plural in the title of this post, which indicates that he has had multiple encounters such as this in the past where staff could have been incompetent, could have been not, I don't know, I wasn't there. Makes me think that this case riiight here was but a tipping point for this user and is using it as a reason to lash out. Now I do understand this can be seen as unfair from a users viewpoint, but being rude, harsh and overly critical about how a situation is handled even though they don't know the proper procedures is just stupid. He responded to the question "What was the detectives name?" with IDK And like he said, the user disconnected right after that response. 
No i tried to but he left after i said idk also he never gave me the time to check Bit hard to explain a situation to someone who's not there don't you think? Now then mr. maddox, that last screenshot of the dm's, IS NOT solid proof. You don't know the whole conversation I did all of that and i said ok because there was nothing else for me to say. Also i said idk because there Multiple detectives. I did also check but he straight up left and im surprised that he didnt screen shot his attitude.  Surprised I have to spell these things out for you  |
|
|
|
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226607
|
Gin wrote:
Lewis_is_java wrote:
Not really he had to have been there at somepoint ot have made the report right Gin wrote:
Now things are flying over your head, karen.Maddox wrote:
You're missing the point and everything is flying over your head keep all the salt out of that main dish, all poogle had to do is exactly what the super admin did that you keep refering to and explain the situation to the user and why he could not handle the situation instead of saying "idk", this is the lack of ability to handle the situation which would be quite clearly frustrating to any user.Gin wrote:
Man here you go again with the intellectual responsesSorry if I came across harsh I didnt mean to and I personally don't feel I was harsh with you , but my issue again isn't with you but your ability to deal with these situations with the rank you'reapplying for I'm sure you do lots but from this and what I've read I was just curious for your side and opinion as from what I recall this role is reserved for very dedicated people who have earned it Again, Like I said, A super admin (the rank he is applying for!!!!!!) said the same thing as me and poogleJust scroll back, the dudes name is Mattors, like i said in my earlier post If you weren't there, how can you claim the admin didn't do anything to resolve the situation? You're former staff, you know a lot of users, mostly newcomers, get salty when an rdm situation can't be dealt with properly. Let me cook up a more realistic scenario with imagination as the main dish with some staffing experience on the side: The user was pissed when things didn't go their way and blamed staff even though they did all they could. Hes using ADMINS as in plural in the title of this post, which indicates that he has had multiple encounters such as this in the past where staff could have been incompetent, could have been not, I don't know, I wasn't there. Makes me think that this case riiight here was but a tipping point for this user and is using it as a reason to lash out. Now I do understand this can be seen as unfair from a users viewpoint, but being rude, harsh and overly critical about how a situation is handled even though they don't know the proper procedures is just stupid. He responded to the question "What was the detectives name?" with IDK And like he said, the user disconnected right after that response.
No i tried to but he left after i said idk also he never gave me the time to check Bit hard to explain a situation to someone who's not there don't you think? Now then mr. maddox, that last screenshot of the dm's, IS NOT solid proof. You don't know the whole conversation I did all of that and i said ok because there was nothing else for me to say. Also i said idk because there Multiple detectives. I did also check but he straight up left and im surprised that he didnt screen shot his attitude. Surprised I have to spell these things out for you  |
|
|
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226609
|
Gin wrote:
Lewis_is_java wrote:
look at the active chat, rittsu didnt try to drill the reported person on who the detective was once when it was his primary defence, rittsu should have kept the chat open until he was sure that it was the case by asking for evidence from people on the server and the reported player but his response was only "ok" in regards to the chat the only thing that it spells out to me is that rittsu wasnt following through the active chat and just let the reported player go without asking for any contrary information on the server Gin wrote:
Now things are flying over your head, karen.Maddox wrote:
You're missing the point and everything is flying over your head keep all the salt out of that main dish, all poogle had to do is exactly what the super admin did that you keep refering to and explain the situation to the user and why he could not handle the situation instead of saying "idk", this is the lack of ability to handle the situation which would be quite clearly frustrating to any user.Gin wrote:
Man here you go again with the intellectual responsesSorry if I came across harsh I didnt mean to and I personally don't feel I was harsh with you , but my issue again isn't with you but your ability to deal with these situations with the rank you'reapplying for I'm sure you do lots but from this and what I've read I was just curious for your side and opinion as from what I recall this role is reserved for very dedicated people who have earned it Again, Like I said, A super admin (the rank he is applying for!!!!!!) said the same thing as me and poogleJust scroll back, the dudes name is Mattors, like i said in my earlier post If you weren't there, how can you claim the admin didn't do anything to resolve the situation? You're former staff, you know a lot of users, mostly newcomers, get salty when an rdm situation can't be dealt with properly. Let me cook up a more realistic scenario with imagination as the main dish with some staffing experience on the side: The user was pissed when things didn't go their way and blamed staff even though they did all they could. Hes using ADMINS as in plural in the title of this post, which indicates that he has had multiple encounters such as this in the past where staff could have been incompetent, could have been not, I don't know, I wasn't there. Makes me think that this case riiight here was but a tipping point for this user and is using it as a reason to lash out. Now I do understand this can be seen as unfair from a users viewpoint, but being rude, harsh and overly critical about how a situation is handled even though they don't know the proper procedures is just stupid. He responded to the question "What was the detectives name?" with IDK And like he said, the user disconnected right after that response.
No i tried to but he left after i said idk also he never gave me the time to check Bit hard to explain a situation to someone who's not there don't you think? Now then mr. maddox, that last screenshot of the dm's, IS NOT solid proof. You don't know the whole conversation I did all of that and i said ok because there was nothing else for me to say. Also i said idk because there Multiple detectives. I did also check but he straight up left and im surprised that he didnt screen shot his attitude. Surprised I have to spell these things out for you |
|
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226610
|
Lewis_is_java wrote:
Gin wrote:
You're just joking at this point or going full on monkey mode, either way, I've explained everything best as I can and I don't think there's reason for me to respond anymore Lewis_is_java wrote:
Not really he had to have been there at somepoint ot have made the report right Gin wrote:
Now things are flying over your head, karen.Maddox wrote:
You're missing the point and everything is flying over your head keep all the salt out of that main dish, all poogle had to do is exactly what the super admin did that you keep refering to and explain the situation to the user and why he could not handle the situation instead of saying "idk", this is the lack of ability to handle the situation which would be quite clearly frustrating to any user.Gin wrote:
Man here you go again with the intellectual responsesSorry if I came across harsh I didnt mean to and I personally don't feel I was harsh with you , but my issue again isn't with you but your ability to deal with these situations with the rank you'reapplying for I'm sure you do lots but from this and what I've read I was just curious for your side and opinion as from what I recall this role is reserved for very dedicated people who have earned it Again, Like I said, A super admin (the rank he is applying for!!!!!!) said the same thing as me and poogleJust scroll back, the dudes name is Mattors, like i said in my earlier post If you weren't there, how can you claim the admin didn't do anything to resolve the situation? You're former staff, you know a lot of users, mostly newcomers, get salty when an rdm situation can't be dealt with properly. Let me cook up a more realistic scenario with imagination as the main dish with some staffing experience on the side: The user was pissed when things didn't go their way and blamed staff even though they did all they could. Hes using ADMINS as in plural in the title of this post, which indicates that he has had multiple encounters such as this in the past where staff could have been incompetent, could have been not, I don't know, I wasn't there. Makes me think that this case riiight here was but a tipping point for this user and is using it as a reason to lash out. Now I do understand this can be seen as unfair from a users viewpoint, but being rude, harsh and overly critical about how a situation is handled even though they don't know the proper procedures is just stupid. He responded to the question "What was the detectives name?" with IDK And like he said, the user disconnected right after that response.
No i tried to but he left after i said idk also he never gave me the time to check Bit hard to explain a situation to someone who's not there don't you think? Now then mr. maddox, that last screenshot of the dm's, IS NOT solid proof. You don't know the whole conversation I did all of that and i said ok because there was nothing else for me to say. Also i said idk because there Multiple detectives. I did also check but he straight up left and im surprised that he didnt screen shot his attitude. Surprised I have to spell these things out for you  look at the active chat, rittsu didnt try to drill the reported person on who the detective was once when it was his primary defence, rittsu should have kept the chat open until he was sure that it was the case by asking for evidence from people on the server and the reported player but his response was only "ok" in regards to the chat the only thing that it spells out to me is that rittsu wasnt following through the active chat and just let the reported player go without asking for any contrary information on the server You of all people should know that user witnesses don't count for shit on zarp TTT |
|
|
|
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226612
|
Gin wrote:
Lewis_is_java wrote:
Just trying to speak your language brother hoping something will get through Gin wrote:
You're just joking at this point or going full on monkey mode, either way, I've explained everything best as I can and I don't think there's reason for me to respond anymore Lewis_is_java wrote:
Not really he had to have been there at somepoint ot have made the report right Gin wrote:
Now things are flying over your head, karen.Maddox wrote:
You're missing the point and everything is flying over your head keep all the salt out of that main dish, all poogle had to do is exactly what the super admin did that you keep refering to and explain the situation to the user and why he could not handle the situation instead of saying "idk", this is the lack of ability to handle the situation which would be quite clearly frustrating to any user.Gin wrote:
Man here you go again with the intellectual responsesSorry if I came across harsh I didnt mean to and I personally don't feel I was harsh with you , but my issue again isn't with you but your ability to deal with these situations with the rank you'reapplying for I'm sure you do lots but from this and what I've read I was just curious for your side and opinion as from what I recall this role is reserved for very dedicated people who have earned it Again, Like I said, A super admin (the rank he is applying for!!!!!!) said the same thing as me and poogleJust scroll back, the dudes name is Mattors, like i said in my earlier post If you weren't there, how can you claim the admin didn't do anything to resolve the situation? You're former staff, you know a lot of users, mostly newcomers, get salty when an rdm situation can't be dealt with properly. Let me cook up a more realistic scenario with imagination as the main dish with some staffing experience on the side: The user was pissed when things didn't go their way and blamed staff even though they did all they could. Hes using ADMINS as in plural in the title of this post, which indicates that he has had multiple encounters such as this in the past where staff could have been incompetent, could have been not, I don't know, I wasn't there. Makes me think that this case riiight here was but a tipping point for this user and is using it as a reason to lash out. Now I do understand this can be seen as unfair from a users viewpoint, but being rude, harsh and overly critical about how a situation is handled even though they don't know the proper procedures is just stupid. He responded to the question "What was the detectives name?" with IDK And like he said, the user disconnected right after that response.
No i tried to but he left after i said idk also he never gave me the time to check Bit hard to explain a situation to someone who's not there don't you think? Now then mr. maddox, that last screenshot of the dm's, IS NOT solid proof. You don't know the whole conversation I did all of that and i said ok because there was nothing else for me to say. Also i said idk because there Multiple detectives. I did also check but he straight up left and im surprised that he didnt screen shot his attitude. Surprised I have to spell these things out for you  |
|
|
|
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226614
|
Gin wrote:
Lewis_is_java wrote:
Gin wrote:
true but there are other forms of evidence i haven't mentioned, such as a screen recording or maybe asking a trusted member such as staff online at the time.Lewis_is_java wrote:
Gin wrote:
Now things are flying over your head, karen.Maddox wrote:
You're missing the point and everything is flying over your head keep all the salt out of that main dish, all poogle had to do is exactly what the super admin did that you keep refering to and explain the situation to the user and why he could not handle the situation instead of saying "idk", this is the lack of ability to handle the situation which would be quite clearly frustrating to any user.Gin wrote:
Man here you go again with the intellectual responsesSorry if I came across harsh I didnt mean to and I personally don't feel I was harsh with you , but my issue again isn't with you but your ability to deal with these situations with the rank you'reapplying for I'm sure you do lots but from this and what I've read I was just curious for your side and opinion as from what I recall this role is reserved for very dedicated people who have earned it Again, Like I said, A super admin (the rank he is applying for!!!!!!) said the same thing as me and poogleJust scroll back, the dudes name is Mattors, like i said in my earlier post If you weren't there, how can you claim the admin didn't do anything to resolve the situation? You're former staff, you know a lot of users, mostly newcomers, get salty when an rdm situation can't be dealt with properly. Let me cook up a more realistic scenario with imagination as the main dish with some staffing experience on the side: The user was pissed when things didn't go their way and blamed staff even though they did all they could. Hes using ADMINS as in plural in the title of this post, which indicates that he has had multiple encounters such as this in the past where staff could have been incompetent, could have been not, I don't know, I wasn't there. Makes me think that this case riiight here was but a tipping point for this user and is using it as a reason to lash out. Now I do understand this can be seen as unfair from a users viewpoint, but being rude, harsh and overly critical about how a situation is handled even though they don't know the proper procedures is just stupid. He responded to the question "What was the detectives name?" with IDK And like he said, the user disconnected right after that response.
No i tried to but he left after i said idk also he never gave me the time to check Bit hard to explain a situation to someone who's not there don't you think? Now then mr. maddox, that last screenshot of the dm's, IS NOT solid proof. You don't know the whole conversation I did all of that and i said ok because there was nothing else for me to say. Also i said idk because there Multiple detectives. I did also check but he straight up left and im surprised that he didnt screen shot his attitude. Surprised I have to spell these things out for you look at the active chat, rittsu didnt try to drill the reported person on who the detective was once when it was his primary defence, rittsu should have kept the chat open until he was sure that it was the case by asking for evidence from people on the server and the reported player but his response was only "ok" in regards to the chat the only thing that it spells out to me is that rittsu wasnt following through the active chat and just let the reported player go without asking for any contrary information on the server You of all people should know that user witnesses don't count for shit on zarp TTTidk why its in quotes |
|
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226620
|
Maddox wrote:
Gin wrote:
Lewis_is_java wrote:
look at the active chat, rittsu didnt try to drill the reported person on who the detective was once when it was his primary defence, rittsu should have kept the chat open until he was sure that it was the case by asking for evidence from people on the server and the reported player but his response was only "ok" in regards to the chat the only thing that it spells out to me is that rittsu wasnt following through the active chat and just let the reported player go without asking for any contrary information on the serverGin wrote:
Now things are flying over your head, karen.Maddox wrote:
You're missing the point and everything is flying over your head keep all the salt out of that main dish, all poogle had to do is exactly what the super admin did that you keep refering to and explain the situation to the user and why he could not handle the situation instead of saying "idk", this is the lack of ability to handle the situation which would be quite clearly frustrating to any user.Gin wrote:
Man here you go again with the intellectual responsesSorry if I came across harsh I didnt mean to and I personally don't feel I was harsh with you , but my issue again isn't with you but your ability to deal with these situations with the rank you'reapplying for I'm sure you do lots but from this and what I've read I was just curious for your side and opinion as from what I recall this role is reserved for very dedicated people who have earned it Again, Like I said, A super admin (the rank he is applying for!!!!!!) said the same thing as me and poogleJust scroll back, the dudes name is Mattors, like i said in my earlier post If you weren't there, how can you claim the admin didn't do anything to resolve the situation? You're former staff, you know a lot of users, mostly newcomers, get salty when an rdm situation can't be dealt with properly. Let me cook up a more realistic scenario with imagination as the main dish with some staffing experience on the side: The user was pissed when things didn't go their way and blamed staff even though they did all they could. Hes using ADMINS as in plural in the title of this post, which indicates that he has had multiple encounters such as this in the past where staff could have been incompetent, could have been not, I don't know, I wasn't there. Makes me think that this case riiight here was but a tipping point for this user and is using it as a reason to lash out. Now I do understand this can be seen as unfair from a users viewpoint, but being rude, harsh and overly critical about how a situation is handled even though they don't know the proper procedures is just stupid. He responded to the question "What was the detectives name?" with IDK And like he said, the user disconnected right after that response.
No i tried to but he left after i said idk also he never gave me the time to check Bit hard to explain a situation to someone who's not there don't you think? Now then mr. maddox, that last screenshot of the dm's, IS NOT solid proof. You don't know the whole conversation I did all of that and i said ok because there was nothing else for me to say. Also i said idk because there Multiple detectives. I did also check but he straight up left and im surprised that he didnt screen shot his attitude. Surprised I have to spell these things out for you That wasnt even the whole chat plus that screenshot doesnt show what i said after but he left that out |
|
EX - Surf Super Admin EX - TTT Admin X2 EX - Deathrun Admin EX - Minecraft Mod |
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226622
|
-TTT Ex-Admin-
-Deathrun Ex-Head Admin- -Ex-TeamSpeak Staff- -Surf Ex-Mod- |
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226624
|
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226626
|
poogle wrote:
Maddox wrote:
As someone else said it just looks like you have a general apathy for your role Gin wrote:
Lewis_is_java wrote:
look at the active chat, rittsu didnt try to drill the reported person on who the detective was once when it was his primary defence, rittsu should have kept the chat open until he was sure that it was the case by asking for evidence from people on the server and the reported player but his response was only "ok" in regards to the chat the only thing that it spells out to me is that rittsu wasnt following through the active chat and just let the reported player go without asking for any contrary information on the serverGin wrote:
Now things are flying over your head, karen.Maddox wrote:
You're missing the point and everything is flying over your head keep all the salt out of that main dish, all poogle had to do is exactly what the super admin did that you keep refering to and explain the situation to the user and why he could not handle the situation instead of saying "idk", this is the lack of ability to handle the situation which would be quite clearly frustrating to any user.Gin wrote:
Man here you go again with the intellectual responsesSorry if I came across harsh I didnt mean to and I personally don't feel I was harsh with you , but my issue again isn't with you but your ability to deal with these situations with the rank you'reapplying for I'm sure you do lots but from this and what I've read I was just curious for your side and opinion as from what I recall this role is reserved for very dedicated people who have earned it Again, Like I said, A super admin (the rank he is applying for!!!!!!) said the same thing as me and poogleJust scroll back, the dudes name is Mattors, like i said in my earlier post If you weren't there, how can you claim the admin didn't do anything to resolve the situation? You're former staff, you know a lot of users, mostly newcomers, get salty when an rdm situation can't be dealt with properly. Let me cook up a more realistic scenario with imagination as the main dish with some staffing experience on the side: The user was pissed when things didn't go their way and blamed staff even though they did all they could. Hes using ADMINS as in plural in the title of this post, which indicates that he has had multiple encounters such as this in the past where staff could have been incompetent, could have been not, I don't know, I wasn't there. Makes me think that this case riiight here was but a tipping point for this user and is using it as a reason to lash out. Now I do understand this can be seen as unfair from a users viewpoint, but being rude, harsh and overly critical about how a situation is handled even though they don't know the proper procedures is just stupid. He responded to the question "What was the detectives name?" with IDK And like he said, the user disconnected right after that response.
No i tried to but he left after i said idk also he never gave me the time to check Bit hard to explain a situation to someone who's not there don't you think? Now then mr. maddox, that last screenshot of the dm's, IS NOT solid proof. You don't know the whole conversation I did all of that and i said ok because there was nothing else for me to say. Also i said idk because there Multiple detectives. I did also check but he straight up left and im surprised that he didnt screen shot his attitude. Surprised I have to spell these things out for you That wasnt even the whole chat plus that screenshot doesnt show what i said after but he left that out |
|
|
|
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226630
|
|
|
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226631
|
|
Discord: thexnator Former Community Owner: 2020-2022 |
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226632
|
|
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226638
|
|
EX - Surf Super Admin EX - TTT Admin X2 EX - Deathrun Admin EX - Minecraft Mod |
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226641
|
|
Zooming in is great guys! 
|
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226645
|
|
bestest ex ssrp super admin
e |
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 1 month ago #1226647
|
Why Admins never cares complicated problems 6 years 4 weeks ago #1226867
|
You have had plenty of time to sue the correct template and provide further evidence to your story, which you have failed to do.
I will speak with Rittsu to pay more attention and ensure more care is taken where appropriate however this report will go no further an no action will be taken. 
|
|
✪ SSRP Balla ✪ ✪ Ex Minecraft Head Administrator ✪ ✪ Ex TTT Head Administrator ✪ ✪ Ex SSRP Administrator ✪ ✪ Ex Forum/ TS Staff ✪ |
227 PLAYERS ONLINE
DarkRP 1
0/127
Online
Deathrun
0/40
Online
TTT
0/47
Online
Bhop
0/32
Online
Surf
0/32
Online
Prop Hunt
0/42
Online
Sandbox
0/42
Online
Discord
227/1020
Online