TOPIC: [SSRP] [Mod-Application] [-Apple Gaming]

Details

RP Name: |Z| |Apple Gaming|
Link to Steam Profile: steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198166731608/
SteamID: STEAM_0:0:103232940
Current Gametracker Profiles:
Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/server_info/play.zar.../?query=Apple+Gaming
Server 2 - www.gametracker.com/server_info/play.zar.../?query=Apple+Gaming

Age: 13

Estimated Server Time: +1300Hours

Languages I speak: French, Spanish, Dutch and English.

DarkRP Related

Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario.
Random Death Match, (RDM) is when a User kills another User for no reason. For example, Player 8 just kills Player 3 for no reason, this would be classed as RDM and is a warn able offence.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario.
New Life Rule, (NLR) is when a User goes back to the District they died in before there timer located at the top of the screen is over. For example, Player 7 kills Player 1 for raiding there base, then Player 1 comes back this would be classed as NLR and is a warn able offence.

Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario.
Metagaming is when a User gives away the location of another User or anything else such as a base. For example, Player 2 gives away the location of Player 9 when Player 9 doesn't want anyone to know where He/She is, this is classed as Metagaming and is a warn able or kickable offence.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.
I would ask for more proof because Player Y might of killed him for raiding his base or counter raiding, if they fail to provide proof I would end the sit because I would be able to do nothing.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.
I would still ask for proof but still warn him since it is good to have backup, if there isn't proof I would still warn Player Y since the logs clearly state that he broke New Life Rule (NLR).

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided
I would warn him for Metagaming and just leave him until the Users have stopped raiding him, then I would TP him to a sit and explain what he had done wrong, after that I would ask him if they needed any other help if he says no I would TP him back and if he says Yes then I would help him with whatever he wanted.

Why I should be chosen (we recommend around 150 words):
>
I think I should become Moderator since I could really help with people problems on SSRP 1 and 2. I think I have good knowledge of the servers so I would make a great addition to the staff team. I recently downloaded TeamSpeak so I will be able to take part in most meetings if I am not ill or away.

You forgot to say that they can't remember anything that happened in their last life and in what district Player 1 was raiding.

PROS:
Amazing overall time
Has become involved in the community
NEUTRALS:
Extremely bad reputation with the community (or at least within gangs)
This is neutral because staff doesn't consider this very bad, just a tad disapproving
CONS:
NLR scenario is incorrect
Player Y would be given off with no action, but a final statement. Player X could've moved locations and killed player Y (or vise versa) for an entirely different RP reason
Metagaming explanation is scenario specific, and does not specify where chat "Player 2" chatted
Metagaming scenario is very wrong
Player X wouldn't be warned right away, as he/she didn't do it before. They also wouldn't be warned right away if they were in a raid, they would be told in OOC chat to stop metagaming, and take the chat message elsewhere. If they fail to do that, you take them to a roof and explain to them. If they still fail, you finally warn them
Gametrackers are broken/you barely have any time this week
Staff requires ~two weeks of good, constant activity when the time for the meeting comes, most of the time


Overall:
-Needs better explanations and situation handling
-Needs MUCH better recent time
-You've been in the community for a while, and have gotten to know people

Other Notes:
-Teamspeak is a required resource for staff, so that they can attend meetings and deal with users via a private conversation. You put this in your "why I should be staff" section, but it should be had by all staff at this point, which is why many applications don't include it

Needs more recent activity,Metagaming and NLR explanations are wrong.Also if a player breaks a rule and never did it before he gets a verbal warning.

You have a from me.

Thanks for applying for staff at ZARP DarkRp! During our weekly staff meeting your application, question answers, game trackers and in-game warnings are checked and then the staff team votes on your application.

This time, the staff team have decided that you still need to work on your application and then apply again next week. To try and help you they have summarised some positives & negatives discussed during the meeting:

You can apply again at any time, and thanks for supporting ZARP!