Login to ZARP
|
RP Name: |Z|Thijs[420 Raid It Leader]
Link to Steam Profile: Thijs SteamID: STEAM_0:1:60238487 Gametracker server 1: www.gametracker.com/player/thijs/play.zarpgaming.com:27015/ Gametracker server 2: I did play on this server but I cant find my gametracker. Age: 14 Estimated Server Time: 6838 when i last checked on 17:17 11-7-2015 Languages I speak: Mainly Dutch and English very well DarkRP Related Random Death Match or RDM is that you kill another player without a roleplay reason. Example: Player Johnny hates Player Harly because they once had a fight about NLR, Johnny sees Harly on the street and shoots him through the head. New Life Rule New Life Rule, that means when I die I must forget everyting about my previous life, I can't go to the same place for three minutes too. Example: Johnny has a base and Harly raids the base, Johnny dies during the raid and he doesn't want his printers to be stolen, so when he respawns he immediately runs back to his base and kills Harly. Metagaming Metagaming is as a player uses the Out Of Character (OOC) chat for in character purposes. Example:Harly is getting raided and wants the police to help, so instead of using /911 he uses // I need help at the fountain! im getting raided by Johnny! Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x. I would bring both of them to a roof so we can talk without being disturbed, then i would ask Player X of proof that he got RDM'd, if he has valid proof i would warn Player Y, if not i would ask Player Y if he has proof of not doing it, if both of them has no proof i will trust the console completly and warn Player Y for RDM. But before I warn him i will ask him if he has a reason for the RDM, if he has a valid reason for the RDM, like self-defence I would verbally warn Player X and let Player Y unwarned. Player X accuses player Y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time. I would bring them to a roof again and ask Player Y why he broke NLR, if he has a valid reason, like bank raid or pd raid, I would let Player Y go and explain Player X about that in that situations you can break NLR, then I would tp him back aswell. If not i would warn Player Y for breaking NLR Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player X calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided. I would tell player X in /pm that that is metagaming and you have to do that in /911, the I would verbally warn him. Why I should be chosen Im maybe not the oldest player, but I know the rules well and I like to help people, I have played alot on this server and I played for a long time, I always try to let other people follow the rules but I can't do so much now to help people and let them follow the rules. I come online everyday (exept for this vacation, then i'm sometimes a week away.) I had some warnings but after that i opened !motd and I read what I did wrong and I tried to not do it wrong again, and that worked, I do not have so much warnings because i read the rules well, but sometimes i did forget them, now i know them all. |
|
Last Edit: 9 years 11 months ago by thijsthijs38.
The topic has been locked.
|
Looks like u just started to playing on this server but application looks rushed i am not gonna give +/- support but i just would like to say its rushed u need to improve your game time
|
|
Former SSRP Super Administrator
Former BHOP Moderator Former Deathrun Administrator Former Teamspeak Moderator A legend steamcommunity.com/id/nottheoneyouthnk
The topic has been locked.
|
+support good playtime and good guy in game
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
It's not Christmas but okay.
-Missing Link to Steam Profile Gametime/Activity is excellent. I did play on this server but I cant find my gametracker Quite strange, I looked up with two of your names, didn't come up.Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario Metagaming is as a player uses the Out Of Character (OOC) chat for in character purposes. Or vice versa*Expand the following: Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x Missing the following: Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time. Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided I would tp to player X and put the raid on hold, tell player X about metagaming and how he can request help, then i would put the raid back on. You wouldn't put the raid "on hold" just because someone broke metagaming . You can use chat channels such as PM or OOC and verbally warn him not to do it again.I don't know if you have any warnings. |
|
Last Edit: 9 years 11 months ago by Studio Banter.
The topic has been locked.
|
My steam link is on my app for me, but I will check it on my brothers pc, i will expand the things you told me to do and edit the app, thanks for the feedback.
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
Sorry but:
I verbally warned you like 6 times in 2 days i will look to your warnings. For now neutreal(if i see any recent warning i will change it to -SUPPORT!) Edit: -SUPPORT! images.akamai.steamusercontent.com/ugc/6...ckground-color=black |
|
Last Edit: 9 years 11 months ago by Holly Banker.
The topic has been locked.
|
thijsthijs38 wrote:
RP Name: |Z|Thijs[420 Raid It Leader] That part seemed a bit creepy for me and you have some recent warns (Click Here) I would bring both of them to a roof so we can talk without being disturbed, then i would ask Player X of proof that he got RDM'd, if he has valid proof i would warn Player Y, if not i would ask Player Y if he has proof of not doing it, if both of them has no proof i will trust the console completly and warn Player Y for RDM. But before I warn him i will ask him if he has a reason for the RDM, if he has a valid reason for the RDM, like self-defence I would verbally warn Player X and let Player Y unwarned. |
|
Last Edit: 9 years 11 months ago by Progr4mm3r.
The topic has been locked.
|
First and foremost, we'd like to thank you for making the effort to apply for a rank on the ZARP Semi Serious DarkRP. Your application has been discussed at an administrative meeting, and from there it has been voted on.
Unfortunately as more staff members voted 'no' than 'yes', the application has been denied. The meeting host has taken some criticisms made by the admins and provided you with this feedback: The staff team feel you need to just work on the one recent warning and then apply again. You are welcome to apply again at any point. |
|
The topic has been locked.
|