TOPIC: [SSRP] Punishment request - Yis yas

Name - (What is the accused person's name?)
zarpistfromOW
Steam-ID - (What is the accused person's Steam-ID?)
STEAM_0:1:714931275
Evidence Of Steam-ID - (Screenshot or video of the accused players Steam-ID)
steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2995593773
Server - (What server was this on?)
s1
Time And Date (CET) - (When did it happen?)
now
Reason - (What rules did the person break?)
Raiding as Lawnower
Story - (What happened?)
I would like to come back to this report since the results that were presented to me on this report are totally inconsistent and irrefutable to the story that I provided + proof so I will explain in its context with the supporting documents that I have given when yis yas must be warned for this action

First of all I made this report because in its context yis yas again broke the rules to harm me in the city event by destroying my tact which is considered a raid he knew what he was doing since in this context yis yas wanted to do this to prevent me from guaranteeing victory since in the clip you can see that I am in first place.
And to answer dutch it has nothing to do with the article itself or the fact that I'm rich I'm talking about the context and not the value to which I lost I don't care about having lost this "tact " for you to put in mind I report the facts and not the elements that I lost.

Moreover the fact of ignoring any ridiculous act such as I have just done and totally incredible how not reporting this small detail makes it an act to be put under the carpet when the small acts that accumulate make the big ones and I speak here of a fact that i experienced before with richard when i destroyed his tact as a medic when i didn't think it was considered a raid to begin with but was made to understand thanks to josh who took this appeal and reduced it by saying to follow the rules blah blah blah and when it comes to a player that I report for this fact he completely changes sides and contradicts what he once defended before

zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/appeals-a...935-ssrp-warn-appeal

So I think everything said in the result is only banality and not the truth compared to what I have shown and said so far

Proof - (Any proof (video or screenshot) that clearly shows what happened.)

Dutch and josh can't handle

This sure is a shame, I wish I could have handled this. damn, that's a bummer.
please let me handle sinz PLEASE

Reporting someone for something so little is retarded, to say the least.
Not to mention this is pretty much a gray zone in the rules IMO (Maybe there should be a rule change or a rule added in the next meeting).
Also, I'm kind of sick of the "Im being targetted" shit, maybe it's cause there's not all too many players and you're one of the only players to interact with in a bad or good way.

JoshuaIsGreat wrote: "Appeal Decision - Case of Sinz (STEAM_0:0:3818233)

After carefully reviewing the information provided and considering the circumstances surrounding the warning, we have reached a decision regarding your appeal.

Upon examination of the evidence and the reported incident, it has been determined that the warning issued to you by Father Watson (STEAM_0:0:45068417) will remain in place. The warning was given based on the reported raiding as a medic and disrespectful behavior.

While you have provided your perspective and claim that the incident involved the destruction of a tact that you intended to refund, our rules and guidelines prohibit raiding as a medic. It is essential to uphold the server's rules to ensure a fair and enjoyable experience for all players.

We understand that there may be differing interpretations and disagreements regarding the situation. However, after careful consideration, we believe that the warning was justified based on the available evidence and the reported violations.

We encourage you to familiarize yourself with our server's rules and guidelines to ensure a better understanding of what is considered acceptable behavior. We value a respectful and cooperative community and expect all players to adhere to these guidelines.

Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention and submitting your appeal. We appreciate your understanding of our decision. If you have any further concerns or questions, please feel free to contact us.

"

Your entity wasn't in a base you spack so it's not a raid now is it?

If you hadn't tried to kill him nothing would have happened, maybe put your money and suits to practice so next time you can kill an unarmed player on a lawnmower.

Reporting someone for something so little is retarded, to say the least.
Not to mention this is pretty much a gray zone in the rules IMO (Maybe there should be a rule change or a rule added in the next meeting).
Also, I'm kind of sick of the "Im being targetted" shit, maybe it's cause there's not all too many players and you're one of the only players to interact with in a bad or good way.

sinzz wrote: what exactly does copy-pasting some outcome change about the situation

To be fair the link you gave from faithful in my outcome it was the same what I stated aswell. You're reporting players for absolute small reasons. ( RDM Whilst you are AFK without losing anything but only 1 milisecond) You have made so much from people that are AFK and you winning every event.

the 'facts' to me are that the situation is a grey area since a tac is not 'a base' and I couldn't find anything in the serverrules about destroying a tact for no reason

is this just you stomping your feet on the ground like a little kid because you don't get what you want?

JoshuaIsGreat wrote:
here is what you answered that I called for raid as medic and as by chance it is not the same thing hmm

xDutchCat wrote:
I just copied the wrong wire that's all and the fact that I have been warned in the past for so little does not in the least disregard this case either

John Sneed wrote: I would just report him anyway lose or win the event, he can't do this and he know he can't

sinzz wrote: first of thanks you chatgpt for co-writing that with me.
second of all as stated in my reply and dutchcats outcome, it's a GRAY zone in the rules. staff can really decide themselves if they want to punish for it IMO. Maybe a rule should be made so it's more clear. I stand with what I said in my response to this and the response I (apparently) had before.

JoshuaIsGreat wrote: +1 which proves that this appeal was not taken seriously by you write by chat gp instead of your own word while you are able does not give you the right to do so
but you refused this appeal when it's almost the same thing except that I was cooperative when yis yas only provoked

sinzz wrote: objection, relevancy?

JoshuaIsGreat wrote: read up the edit before quote someone mate
cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/858627048...4207681727/image.png

sinzz wrote: Apparently if a situation is unclear for a staff member they don't take you serious?
You're trying to compare Apples and Pears no not even, you're comparing Apples and Carrots.

I took the situation seriously just like Josh.

sinzz wrote: What does provocation have to do with if this is a rule break or not?

JoshuaIsGreat wrote: his mentality how he did it does not give him the fact of being spared from this action

2 reports over a tac, you are extremely sad.