Login to ZARP
|
Plankton wrote:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] dankek wrote:
RedPowder wrote:
dankek wrote:
Server 2 has seen many players whenever SSRP's basing is alive, because it's the go-to server for good connection, at least semi-reliable hitboxes and good basing options. It's map needs to get smaller, since the outer rim of the map is relatively useless, but other than that it's a pretty good server.RedPowder wrote:
Clarky wrote:
The community doesn't know what it wants, Vanilla SSRP would kill zarp just how it did with FP , sometimes it's better ignore the community if you think it will turn out better. Also, removing content is dumb from every aspect.Hacking policy can be changed when the new CM gets it without a democratic vote in the meeting, the problem is after those 30 days it can be changed back by a vote Get em all banned in 30 days then Homie.Raeker wrote: I understand people's complaints regarding hackers, but I refuse to change the policy at this current time. It is for that reason that I haven't added it to my application. Chute and EMP carefully explained one time why the hacking policy is this specific way. I don't fully agree with it, but I understand the decision. I have enougg respect for both of them to not say "Fuck you, I'm changing it anyway." What I cannot understand though is why we have a zero tolerance policy on discrimination. It seems so stupid to immediately ban someone for saying a bad word (and they might not even know it isn't allowed, some other Gmod communities are fine with it) yet to let hackers walk around freely. I'm all for stricter punishments in some regard. I also believe staff should try to be more careful with who they vote for within meetings - technically speaking you do actually get a voluntary job that has an actual effect on the people playing on the server. As far as servers are concerned though, I disagree. SSRP is under EMP's and Chute's discretion. They'll code the updates for it. However other servers have their own respective coders (mostly). Since everyone primarily codes for the servers they want to code on, focussing on less servers won't actually make much of a difference. I fully agree with the second point though. #KickOutTheWankStains That policy as caused more issues than it’s worth oh and that’s what they’re wanting from you they want to give you a chance to put things the way YOU think they should be. If your just going to bow down and follow them then what’s the point? They want new ideas and someone to change what they think is wrong so they can see how it works out. I mean it makes zero difference to me I just think deep down that them things are the key issues. Your a good guy regardless of what you do if you get it and it’s no sweat of my shoulders. Imo, your ideas are not very well thought out , Red. Do you really believe removing one server of THREE to replace it with something a lot of people have been wanting to have is a bad idea ? The content is still there on the other TWO server. Some people do not have really good internet connections and they play with 130~ ping on S1 and 110~ on S2. Also, having a server without as many people means you can more easily base and still get some profit (which is very important for starting players, since they do not have as good gear, and they wouldn't be as used to defending as other people already in the server with similar gear are. So yes, I think it's a terrible idea, and I probably can add more to this than this list. I know your new to the community but server 2 has been dead for 2 years plus now I think you guys are failing to understand what dankek is saying, I don't agree or disagree with him but he is saying that S2 serves a purpose which is to promote basing in a larger map and to help out new players since it has a lower playerbase than S1 which is even more spread out. He is also saying that this purpose attracts players to that server due to its larger map and moneymaking capabilities, hence its playerbase is reliant on the overall playerbase of SSRP. You can see that all 3 servers tend to rise in players simultaneously when they do and likewise they all tend to fall in players simultaneously. Sure a reset vanilla SSRP is what the community wants right now and I've promoted it in the past and I still want it to be honest but it may not solve the problem in the long term. The new players who join in the startup will have a better chance yes, but once they all get rich again and stuff like M202s are in full supply it will still be very difficult for new players to get started. But that is simply the nature of servers including a progression system and that's the reason people even want to play these servers in the first place. Albeit the vanilla aspect of the server means that since you don't have big op fuck off suits and handcannons that destroy entire bases in 3 clicks it will still be much easier for new players than it is now. |
|
Last Edit: 5 years 10 months ago by Denis. Reason: A shit ton of grammar mistakes
Login or register to post a reply.
|
474 Denis wrote:
Plankton wrote:
Thanks for clarifying what I'm saying, I guess some people would rather call me a "fucking idiot" in an indirect reply and cry about me, rather than actually addressing the points I've made. Never knew I'd have to write a 300 word post in order to reply to a useless topic like this one, so people like Red can understand what I'm saying. Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] dankek wrote:
RedPowder wrote:
dankek wrote:
Server 2 has seen many players whenever SSRP's basing is alive, because it's the go-to server for good connection, at least semi-reliable hitboxes and good basing options. It's map needs to get smaller, since the outer rim of the map is relatively useless, but other than that it's a pretty good server.RedPowder wrote:
Clarky wrote:
The community doesn't know what it wants, Vanilla SSRP would kill zarp just how it did with FP , sometimes it's better ignore the community if you think it will turn out better. Also, removing content is dumb from every aspect.Hacking policy can be changed when the new CM gets it without a democratic vote in the meeting, the problem is after those 30 days it can be changed back by a vote Get em all banned in 30 days then Homie.Raeker wrote: I understand people's complaints regarding hackers, but I refuse to change the policy at this current time. It is for that reason that I haven't added it to my application. Chute and EMP carefully explained one time why the hacking policy is this specific way. I don't fully agree with it, but I understand the decision. I have enougg respect for both of them to not say "Fuck you, I'm changing it anyway." What I cannot understand though is why we have a zero tolerance policy on discrimination. It seems so stupid to immediately ban someone for saying a bad word (and they might not even know it isn't allowed, some other Gmod communities are fine with it) yet to let hackers walk around freely. I'm all for stricter punishments in some regard. I also believe staff should try to be more careful with who they vote for within meetings - technically speaking you do actually get a voluntary job that has an actual effect on the people playing on the server. As far as servers are concerned though, I disagree. SSRP is under EMP's and Chute's discretion. They'll code the updates for it. However other servers have their own respective coders (mostly). Since everyone primarily codes for the servers they want to code on, focussing on less servers won't actually make much of a difference. I fully agree with the second point though. #KickOutTheWankStains That policy as caused more issues than it’s worth oh and that’s what they’re wanting from you they want to give you a chance to put things the way YOU think they should be. If your just going to bow down and follow them then what’s the point? They want new ideas and someone to change what they think is wrong so they can see how it works out. I mean it makes zero difference to me I just think deep down that them things are the key issues. Your a good guy regardless of what you do if you get it and it’s no sweat of my shoulders. Imo, your ideas are not very well thought out , Red. Do you really believe removing one server of THREE to replace it with something a lot of people have been wanting to have is a bad idea ? The content is still there on the other TWO server. Some people do not have really good internet connections and they play with 130~ ping on S1 and 110~ on S2. Also, having a server without as many people means you can more easily base and still get some profit (which is very important for starting players, since they do not have as good gear, and they wouldn't be as used to defending as other people already in the server with similar gear are. So yes, I think it's a terrible idea, and I probably can add more to this than this list. I know your new to the community but server 2 has been dead for 2 years plus now I think you guys are failing to understand what dankek is saying, I don't agree or disagree with him but he is saying that S2 serves a purpose which is to promote basing in a larger map and to help out new players since it has a lower playerbase than S1 which is even more spread out. He is also saying that this purpose attracts players to that server due to its larger map and moneymaking capabilities, hence its playerbase is reliant on the overall playerbase of SSRP. You can see that all 3 servers tend to rise in players simultaneously when they do and likewise they all tend to fall in players simultaneously. |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
474 Denis wrote:
Plankton wrote:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] dankek wrote:
RedPowder wrote:
dankek wrote:
Server 2 has seen many players whenever SSRP's basing is alive, because it's the go-to server for good connection, at least semi-reliable hitboxes and good basing options. It's map needs to get smaller, since the outer rim of the map is relatively useless, but other than that it's a pretty good server.RedPowder wrote:
Clarky wrote:
The community doesn't know what it wants, Vanilla SSRP would kill zarp just how it did with FP , sometimes it's better ignore the community if you think it will turn out better. Also, removing content is dumb from every aspect.Hacking policy can be changed when the new CM gets it without a democratic vote in the meeting, the problem is after those 30 days it can be changed back by a vote Get em all banned in 30 days then Homie.Raeker wrote: I understand people's complaints regarding hackers, but I refuse to change the policy at this current time. It is for that reason that I haven't added it to my application. Chute and EMP carefully explained one time why the hacking policy is this specific way. I don't fully agree with it, but I understand the decision. I have enougg respect for both of them to not say "Fuck you, I'm changing it anyway." What I cannot understand though is why we have a zero tolerance policy on discrimination. It seems so stupid to immediately ban someone for saying a bad word (and they might not even know it isn't allowed, some other Gmod communities are fine with it) yet to let hackers walk around freely. I'm all for stricter punishments in some regard. I also believe staff should try to be more careful with who they vote for within meetings - technically speaking you do actually get a voluntary job that has an actual effect on the people playing on the server. As far as servers are concerned though, I disagree. SSRP is under EMP's and Chute's discretion. They'll code the updates for it. However other servers have their own respective coders (mostly). Since everyone primarily codes for the servers they want to code on, focussing on less servers won't actually make much of a difference. I fully agree with the second point though. #KickOutTheWankStains That policy as caused more issues than it’s worth oh and that’s what they’re wanting from you they want to give you a chance to put things the way YOU think they should be. If your just going to bow down and follow them then what’s the point? They want new ideas and someone to change what they think is wrong so they can see how it works out. I mean it makes zero difference to me I just think deep down that them things are the key issues. Your a good guy regardless of what you do if you get it and it’s no sweat of my shoulders. Imo, your ideas are not very well thought out , Red. Do you really believe removing one server of THREE to replace it with something a lot of people have been wanting to have is a bad idea ? The content is still there on the other TWO server. Some people do not have really good internet connections and they play with 130~ ping on S1 and 110~ on S2. Also, having a server without as many people means you can more easily base and still get some profit (which is very important for starting players, since they do not have as good gear, and they wouldn't be as used to defending as other people already in the server with similar gear are. So yes, I think it's a terrible idea, and I probably can add more to this than this list. I know your new to the community but server 2 has been dead for 2 years plus now I think you guys are failing to understand what dankek is saying, I don't agree or disagree with him but he is saying that S2 serves a purpose which is to promote basing in a larger map and to help out new players since it has a lower playerbase than S1 which is even more spread out. He is also saying that this purpose attracts players to that server due to its larger map and moneymaking capabilities, hence its playerbase is reliant on the overall playerbase of SSRP. You can see that all 3 servers tend to rise in players simultaneously when they do and likewise they all tend to fall in players simultaneously. Sure a reset vanilla SSRP is what the community wants right now and I've promoted it in the past and I still want it to be honest but it may not solve the problem in the long term. The new players who join in the startup will have a better chance yes, but once they all get rich again and stuff like M202s are in full supply it will still be very difficult for new players to get started. But that is simply the nature of servers including a progression system and that's the reason people even want to play these servers in the first place. Albeit the vanilla aspect of the server means that since you don't have big op fuck off suits and handcannons that destroy entire bases in 3 clicks it will still be much easier for new players than it is now. No, server 2's purpose is to afk mine and nuke buddy. |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Denis
|
dankek wrote:
474 Denis wrote:
the point you are trying to make is stupid and fucking moronic s2 has been dead for years all it is used for now is vegovevo's alts lul the odd nuke to kill all the miners then its straight back to people being afk that map was pretty shit for basing on too ngl Plankton wrote:
Thanks for clarifying what I'm saying, I guess some people would rather call me a "fucking idiot" in an indirect reply and cry about me, rather than actually addressing the points I've made. Never knew I'd have to write a 300 word post in order to reply to a useless topic like this one, so people like Red can understand what I'm saying.Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] dankek wrote:
RedPowder wrote:
dankek wrote:
Server 2 has seen many players whenever SSRP's basing is alive, because it's the go-to server for good connection, at least semi-reliable hitboxes and good basing options. It's map needs to get smaller, since the outer rim of the map is relatively useless, but other than that it's a pretty good server.RedPowder wrote:
Clarky wrote:
The community doesn't know what it wants, Vanilla SSRP would kill zarp just how it did with FP , sometimes it's better ignore the community if you think it will turn out better. Also, removing content is dumb from every aspect.Hacking policy can be changed when the new CM gets it without a democratic vote in the meeting, the problem is after those 30 days it can be changed back by a vote Get em all banned in 30 days then Homie.Raeker wrote: I understand people's complaints regarding hackers, but I refuse to change the policy at this current time. It is for that reason that I haven't added it to my application. Chute and EMP carefully explained one time why the hacking policy is this specific way. I don't fully agree with it, but I understand the decision. I have enougg respect for both of them to not say "Fuck you, I'm changing it anyway." What I cannot understand though is why we have a zero tolerance policy on discrimination. It seems so stupid to immediately ban someone for saying a bad word (and they might not even know it isn't allowed, some other Gmod communities are fine with it) yet to let hackers walk around freely. I'm all for stricter punishments in some regard. I also believe staff should try to be more careful with who they vote for within meetings - technically speaking you do actually get a voluntary job that has an actual effect on the people playing on the server. As far as servers are concerned though, I disagree. SSRP is under EMP's and Chute's discretion. They'll code the updates for it. However other servers have their own respective coders (mostly). Since everyone primarily codes for the servers they want to code on, focussing on less servers won't actually make much of a difference. I fully agree with the second point though. #KickOutTheWankStains That policy as caused more issues than it’s worth oh and that’s what they’re wanting from you they want to give you a chance to put things the way YOU think they should be. If your just going to bow down and follow them then what’s the point? They want new ideas and someone to change what they think is wrong so they can see how it works out. I mean it makes zero difference to me I just think deep down that them things are the key issues. Your a good guy regardless of what you do if you get it and it’s no sweat of my shoulders. Imo, your ideas are not very well thought out , Red. Do you really believe removing one server of THREE to replace it with something a lot of people have been wanting to have is a bad idea ? The content is still there on the other TWO server. Some people do not have really good internet connections and they play with 130~ ping on S1 and 110~ on S2. Also, having a server without as many people means you can more easily base and still get some profit (which is very important for starting players, since they do not have as good gear, and they wouldn't be as used to defending as other people already in the server with similar gear are. So yes, I think it's a terrible idea, and I probably can add more to this than this list. I know your new to the community but server 2 has been dead for 2 years plus now I think you guys are failing to understand what dankek is saying, I don't agree or disagree with him but he is saying that S2 serves a purpose which is to promote basing in a larger map and to help out new players since it has a lower playerbase than S1 which is even more spread out. He is also saying that this purpose attracts players to that server due to its larger map and moneymaking capabilities, hence its playerbase is reliant on the overall playerbase of SSRP. You can see that all 3 servers tend to rise in players simultaneously when they do and likewise they all tend to fall in players simultaneously. |
|
I like a lot of attention! Please give me attention, daddy! uwu
Login or register to post a reply.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Fork
|
474 Denis wrote:
Plankton wrote:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] dankek wrote:
RedPowder wrote:
dankek wrote:
Server 2 has seen many players whenever SSRP's basing is alive, because it's the go-to server for good connection, at least semi-reliable hitboxes and good basing options. It's map needs to get smaller, since the outer rim of the map is relatively useless, but other than that it's a pretty good server.RedPowder wrote:
Clarky wrote:
The community doesn't know what it wants, Vanilla SSRP would kill zarp just how it did with FP , sometimes it's better ignore the community if you think it will turn out better. Also, removing content is dumb from every aspect.Hacking policy can be changed when the new CM gets it without a democratic vote in the meeting, the problem is after those 30 days it can be changed back by a vote Get em all banned in 30 days then Homie.Raeker wrote: I understand people's complaints regarding hackers, but I refuse to change the policy at this current time. It is for that reason that I haven't added it to my application. Chute and EMP carefully explained one time why the hacking policy is this specific way. I don't fully agree with it, but I understand the decision. I have enougg respect for both of them to not say "Fuck you, I'm changing it anyway." What I cannot understand though is why we have a zero tolerance policy on discrimination. It seems so stupid to immediately ban someone for saying a bad word (and they might not even know it isn't allowed, some other Gmod communities are fine with it) yet to let hackers walk around freely. I'm all for stricter punishments in some regard. I also believe staff should try to be more careful with who they vote for within meetings - technically speaking you do actually get a voluntary job that has an actual effect on the people playing on the server. As far as servers are concerned though, I disagree. SSRP is under EMP's and Chute's discretion. They'll code the updates for it. However other servers have their own respective coders (mostly). Since everyone primarily codes for the servers they want to code on, focussing on less servers won't actually make much of a difference. I fully agree with the second point though. #KickOutTheWankStains That policy as caused more issues than it’s worth oh and that’s what they’re wanting from you they want to give you a chance to put things the way YOU think they should be. If your just going to bow down and follow them then what’s the point? They want new ideas and someone to change what they think is wrong so they can see how it works out. I mean it makes zero difference to me I just think deep down that them things are the key issues. Your a good guy regardless of what you do if you get it and it’s no sweat of my shoulders. Imo, your ideas are not very well thought out , Red. Do you really believe removing one server of THREE to replace it with something a lot of people have been wanting to have is a bad idea ? The content is still there on the other TWO server. Some people do not have really good internet connections and they play with 130~ ping on S1 and 110~ on S2. Also, having a server without as many people means you can more easily base and still get some profit (which is very important for starting players, since they do not have as good gear, and they wouldn't be as used to defending as other people already in the server with similar gear are. So yes, I think it's a terrible idea, and I probably can add more to this than this list. I know your new to the community but server 2 has been dead for 2 years plus now I think you guys are failing to understand what dankek is saying, I don't agree or disagree with him but he is saying that S2 serves a purpose which is to promote basing in a larger map and to help out new players since it has a lower playerbase than S1 which is even more spread out. He is also saying that this purpose attracts players to that server due to its larger map and moneymaking capabilities, hence its playerbase is reliant on the overall playerbase of SSRP. You can see that all 3 servers tend to rise in players simultaneously when they do and likewise they all tend to fall in players simultaneously. Sure a reset vanilla SSRP is what the community wants right now and I've promoted it in the past and I still want it to be honest but it may not solve the problem in the long term. The new players who join in the startup will have a better chance yes, but once they all get rich again and stuff like M202s are in full supply it will still be very difficult for new players to get started. But that is simply the nature of servers including a progression system and that's the reason people even want to play these servers in the first place. Albeit the vanilla aspect of the server means that since you don't have big op fuck off suits and handcannons that destroy entire bases in 3 clicks it will still be much easier for new players than it is now. if the server attracted players because of the map size and money making then the server wouldn't be dead, there is no reason for server 2. the best thing to do with it is to make it into a vanilla server, it's what 90% of the community want. Nobody cares if you wanna sit in the corner of server 2 to make some money dude. Keeping a dead server on the sole reason that its easier to sit afk without player interaction to make money on it is the stupidest argument I've heard in a long time. |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
We got people that should be banned being user/mod.
Wtf is happening, I don't understand any of this, I know that ZARP was always soft when it came to rulebreakers and shit, but dafuq. |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
The following user(s) said Thank You: RedPowder
|
RedPowder wrote:
1) Hacking Policy; Harsher punishment and less chances to come back and do it anymore. 2) Negativity; Kick the Wank stains out that do nothing but bitch all the time and have nothing positive to stay about the community. 3) Staffing; Give the ranks a purpose again and stop letting people get higher ranks without working for them. I don’t care if they have been here a 100yrs if they haven’t worked for them then fuck em. 4) Servers; Less Servers so more focus can be put on the ones that are used the most including removing server 2 SSRP and replacing it with a Vanilla ZARP SSRP 3 years back. 5) Standards; Higher the standards for staff and any other position. I remember when one warning in two weeks was bad now people get staff with two warnings in the same week they apply. This, this, this, this, and this. |
|
I'm an ex at a lot of things:
Global Moderator SSRP Admin (I was SuperAdmin for 10 seconds as a mistake) Minigames Owner Teamspeak Staff Minecraft Mod (lol) Deathrun Mod I used to go by Fennster4 but now I’m cooler
Login or register to post a reply.
|
Plankton wrote:
474 Denis wrote:
I don't even play SSRP and I've never based in my life lmao, I'm just explaining the argument that people make. Plankton wrote:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] dankek wrote:
RedPowder wrote:
dankek wrote:
Server 2 has seen many players whenever SSRP's basing is alive, because it's the go-to server for good connection, at least semi-reliable hitboxes and good basing options. It's map needs to get smaller, since the outer rim of the map is relatively useless, but other than that it's a pretty good server.RedPowder wrote:
Clarky wrote:
The community doesn't know what it wants, Vanilla SSRP would kill zarp just how it did with FP , sometimes it's better ignore the community if you think it will turn out better. Also, removing content is dumb from every aspect.Hacking policy can be changed when the new CM gets it without a democratic vote in the meeting, the problem is after those 30 days it can be changed back by a vote Get em all banned in 30 days then Homie.Raeker wrote: I understand people's complaints regarding hackers, but I refuse to change the policy at this current time. It is for that reason that I haven't added it to my application. Chute and EMP carefully explained one time why the hacking policy is this specific way. I don't fully agree with it, but I understand the decision. I have enougg respect for both of them to not say "Fuck you, I'm changing it anyway." What I cannot understand though is why we have a zero tolerance policy on discrimination. It seems so stupid to immediately ban someone for saying a bad word (and they might not even know it isn't allowed, some other Gmod communities are fine with it) yet to let hackers walk around freely. I'm all for stricter punishments in some regard. I also believe staff should try to be more careful with who they vote for within meetings - technically speaking you do actually get a voluntary job that has an actual effect on the people playing on the server. As far as servers are concerned though, I disagree. SSRP is under EMP's and Chute's discretion. They'll code the updates for it. However other servers have their own respective coders (mostly). Since everyone primarily codes for the servers they want to code on, focussing on less servers won't actually make much of a difference. I fully agree with the second point though. #KickOutTheWankStains That policy as caused more issues than it’s worth oh and that’s what they’re wanting from you they want to give you a chance to put things the way YOU think they should be. If your just going to bow down and follow them then what’s the point? They want new ideas and someone to change what they think is wrong so they can see how it works out. I mean it makes zero difference to me I just think deep down that them things are the key issues. Your a good guy regardless of what you do if you get it and it’s no sweat of my shoulders. Imo, your ideas are not very well thought out , Red. Do you really believe removing one server of THREE to replace it with something a lot of people have been wanting to have is a bad idea ? The content is still there on the other TWO server. Some people do not have really good internet connections and they play with 130~ ping on S1 and 110~ on S2. Also, having a server without as many people means you can more easily base and still get some profit (which is very important for starting players, since they do not have as good gear, and they wouldn't be as used to defending as other people already in the server with similar gear are. So yes, I think it's a terrible idea, and I probably can add more to this than this list. I know your new to the community but server 2 has been dead for 2 years plus now I think you guys are failing to understand what dankek is saying, I don't agree or disagree with him but he is saying that S2 serves a purpose which is to promote basing in a larger map and to help out new players since it has a lower playerbase than S1 which is even more spread out. He is also saying that this purpose attracts players to that server due to its larger map and moneymaking capabilities, hence its playerbase is reliant on the overall playerbase of SSRP. You can see that all 3 servers tend to rise in players simultaneously when they do and likewise they all tend to fall in players simultaneously. Sure a reset vanilla SSRP is what the community wants right now and I've promoted it in the past and I still want it to be honest but it may not solve the problem in the long term. The new players who join in the startup will have a better chance yes, but once they all get rich again and stuff like M202s are in full supply it will still be very difficult for new players to get started. But that is simply the nature of servers including a progression system and that's the reason people even want to play these servers in the first place. Albeit the vanilla aspect of the server means that since you don't have big op fuck off suits and handcannons that destroy entire bases in 3 clicks it will still be much easier for new players than it is now. if the server attracted players because of the map size and money making then the server wouldn't be dead, there is no reason for server 2. the best thing to do with it is to make it into a vanilla server, it's what 90% of the community want. Nobody cares if you wanna sit in the corner of server 2 to make some money dude. Keeping a dead server on the sole reason that its easier to sit afk without player interaction to make money on it is the stupidest argument I've heard in a long time. |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
474 Denis wrote:
Plankton wrote:
474 Denis wrote:
I don't even play SSRP and I've never based in my life lmao, I'm just explaining the argument that people make.Plankton wrote:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] dankek wrote:
RedPowder wrote:
dankek wrote:
Server 2 has seen many players whenever SSRP's basing is alive, because it's the go-to server for good connection, at least semi-reliable hitboxes and good basing options. It's map needs to get smaller, since the outer rim of the map is relatively useless, but other than that it's a pretty good server.RedPowder wrote:
Clarky wrote:
The community doesn't know what it wants, Vanilla SSRP would kill zarp just how it did with FP , sometimes it's better ignore the community if you think it will turn out better. Also, removing content is dumb from every aspect.Hacking policy can be changed when the new CM gets it without a democratic vote in the meeting, the problem is after those 30 days it can be changed back by a vote Get em all banned in 30 days then Homie.Raeker wrote: I understand people's complaints regarding hackers, but I refuse to change the policy at this current time. It is for that reason that I haven't added it to my application. Chute and EMP carefully explained one time why the hacking policy is this specific way. I don't fully agree with it, but I understand the decision. I have enougg respect for both of them to not say "Fuck you, I'm changing it anyway." What I cannot understand though is why we have a zero tolerance policy on discrimination. It seems so stupid to immediately ban someone for saying a bad word (and they might not even know it isn't allowed, some other Gmod communities are fine with it) yet to let hackers walk around freely. I'm all for stricter punishments in some regard. I also believe staff should try to be more careful with who they vote for within meetings - technically speaking you do actually get a voluntary job that has an actual effect on the people playing on the server. As far as servers are concerned though, I disagree. SSRP is under EMP's and Chute's discretion. They'll code the updates for it. However other servers have their own respective coders (mostly). Since everyone primarily codes for the servers they want to code on, focussing on less servers won't actually make much of a difference. I fully agree with the second point though. #KickOutTheWankStains That policy as caused more issues than it’s worth oh and that’s what they’re wanting from you they want to give you a chance to put things the way YOU think they should be. If your just going to bow down and follow them then what’s the point? They want new ideas and someone to change what they think is wrong so they can see how it works out. I mean it makes zero difference to me I just think deep down that them things are the key issues. Your a good guy regardless of what you do if you get it and it’s no sweat of my shoulders. Imo, your ideas are not very well thought out , Red. Do you really believe removing one server of THREE to replace it with something a lot of people have been wanting to have is a bad idea ? The content is still there on the other TWO server. Some people do not have really good internet connections and they play with 130~ ping on S1 and 110~ on S2. Also, having a server without as many people means you can more easily base and still get some profit (which is very important for starting players, since they do not have as good gear, and they wouldn't be as used to defending as other people already in the server with similar gear are. So yes, I think it's a terrible idea, and I probably can add more to this than this list. I know your new to the community but server 2 has been dead for 2 years plus now I think you guys are failing to understand what dankek is saying, I don't agree or disagree with him but he is saying that S2 serves a purpose which is to promote basing in a larger map and to help out new players since it has a lower playerbase than S1 which is even more spread out. He is also saying that this purpose attracts players to that server due to its larger map and moneymaking capabilities, hence its playerbase is reliant on the overall playerbase of SSRP. You can see that all 3 servers tend to rise in players simultaneously when they do and likewise they all tend to fall in players simultaneously. Sure a reset vanilla SSRP is what the community wants right now and I've promoted it in the past and I still want it to be honest but it may not solve the problem in the long term. The new players who join in the startup will have a better chance yes, but once they all get rich again and stuff like M202s are in full supply it will still be very difficult for new players to get started. But that is simply the nature of servers including a progression system and that's the reason people even want to play these servers in the first place. Albeit the vanilla aspect of the server means that since you don't have big op fuck off suits and handcannons that destroy entire bases in 3 clicks it will still be much easier for new players than it is now. if the server attracted players because of the map size and money making then the server wouldn't be dead, there is no reason for server 2. the best thing to do with it is to make it into a vanilla server, it's what 90% of the community want. Nobody cares if you wanna sit in the corner of server 2 to make some money dude. Keeping a dead server on the sole reason that its easier to sit afk without player interaction to make money on it is the stupidest argument I've heard in a long time. And I'm explaining why it's a stupid argument |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
Yeah sure vanilla ssrp server 2.
Its gonna bring a bunch of old players for a while then be even more dead than right now because who in their right minds would want a vanilla darkrp servers like in the old days when joining a random server in 2018 lol. |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
Hacking policy should be changed, enough bullshit about "oh it's the way it has to be", ZARP isn't controlled by any corporate entities.
|
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
Yes
|
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
Bring back the nomination system!!
It worked better!! |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
The following user(s) said Thank You: schnitzel nazi
|
Just my opinion but Clarky has my vote because unlike most (not all) he actually role play’s. How can you take people’s suggestions into consideration when they’re only forum based and rarely ever role play? Not directed at anyone either ( I know the cm election isn’t only just about saving SSRP but just my opinion on people’s changes towards SSRP )
|
|
Last Edit: 5 years 10 months ago by A Bad Roach.
Login or register to post a reply.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Clarky
|
Jool wrote:
Yeah sure vanilla ssrp server 2. Nobody gets it, if the 90% of the community wants it, then every single one of them is retarted. Its gonna bring a bunch of old players for a while then be even more dead than right now because who in their right minds would want a vanilla darkrp servers like in the old days when joining a random server in 2018 lol. |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
dankek wrote:
Jool wrote:
Yeah sure vanilla ssrp server 2. Nobody gets it, if the 90% of the community wants it, then every single one of them is retarted.Its gonna bring a bunch of old players for a while then be even more dead than right now because who in their right minds would want a vanilla darkrp servers like in the old days when joining a random server in 2018 lol. |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
give EMP autonomous control over all things zarp for a month and he'll have this place booming #problemsolved
|
|
Login or register to post a reply.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Nafe, Diet Water
|
Clarky wrote:
Hacking policy can be changed when the new CM gets it without a democratic vote in the meeting, the problem is after those 30 days it can be changed back by a vote Also there is a loophole where nothing that threatens the democratic processes or infrastructure of ZARP can be put into place, but since the definitions for those things are so broad/don't exist, they can pretty much veto whatever they want. |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
|
A Bad Roach wrote:
Just my opinion but Clarky has my vote because unlike most (not all) he actually role play’s. How can you take people’s suggestions into consideration when they’re only forum based and rarely ever role play? Not directed at anyone either ( I know the cm election isn’t only just about saving SSRP but just my opinion on people’s changes towards SSRP ) PSSST! Whoever gets CM won't be able to make changes to SSRP because only Chute and EMP can do that. |
|
Login or register to post a reply.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker
|
Tony Lombardi wrote:
A Bad Roach wrote:
Tony why are we whispering like this? Just my opinion but Clarky has my vote because unlike most (not all) he actually role play’s. How can you take people’s suggestions into consideration when they’re only forum based and rarely ever role play? Not directed at anyone either ( I know the cm election isn’t only just about saving SSRP but just my opinion on people’s changes towards SSRP ) PSSST! Whoever gets CM won't be able to make changes to SSRP because only Chute and EMP can do that. |
|
Last Edit: 5 years 10 months ago by Raeker.
Login or register to post a reply.
|