TOPIC: @Martin

literally was about to reply this to train's appeal but it was locked before i could post:

"can't wait for the subjective and vague tou to be manipulated to class this as disruptive/and or causing issues "

can it please be explained how pinging someone a second time, after being rudely ignored and given no response the first time, can be considered spam-pinging to the extent of causing disruptiveness? no indication whatsoever was given to stop and such a punishment directly goes against the ethos you're so willing to enforce when someone has the direct intention to disrupt

just doesnt add up at all to me

while being directed at martin, consider this a public discussion of sorts regarding what could lead to such a conclusion, because others' input and insight would probably help to clarify some things to me

This isn't the first time he has done it, Buff Horse likes to randomly ping me a lot