TOPIC: [SSRP] Ban Appeal - Sinz

Kronen wrote: cool I listened to your opinion I gave mine I don't agree now stop, stop debating when I said I didn't want to hear from you
also "Making drama(s), causing arguments or events with unfortunate twists."
The fact that I don't agree with what you say creates arguments because of repeated twists on this subject when I have explained to you clearly so I qualify it as drama since you persist on this subject when I told you everything I had to say thank you

sinzz wrote:
Well in this case you're the one causing the argument. Kronen gave his honest opinion on the matter and for some reason you derailed the whole thread and started talking about him scamming and saying stuff like "dishonest people like you are not welcome" - Which has nothing to do with his primary point or your own SSRP appeal lmao.

sinzz wrote: "Stop expressing your opinion because I disagree with it"

Mr. Richard wrote: ok explain the fact that constantly harps on this fact while I clearly explained my point of view to him at the beginning but which persists, oh it's true I forgot that you are the same, you two constantly harp on even when I explain things clearly

Worker From Home wrote: or just stop repeating it and say it again when we understood it from the start and I originally disagreed

sinzz wrote: Now personally id go with codas take on this but that's just me

sinzz wrote:
Personally I'm not a fan of harps, I'm more of a synthesizer kind-of-guy. Anyhow, don't derail the thread with information that is irrelevant to the topic itself - It's about your ban, not Kronen's scamming ban. Thanks.

Mr. Richard wrote: OK richard stop making jokes about my sentence thx + derailed the thread
because by making a joke about the fact that I used this word which means something else which constinues my sentence you will derail it while my example with kronen was valid

sinzz wrote: You literally the one who started derailing it

BCAT wrote: Kronen started to keep going the argue when i tell him to stop

sinzz wrote:
Kronen didn't start anything, he gave his honest opinion why you should be permanently banned again, nothing to do with argueing.

sinzz wrote: write readable english sentences and nobody can make fun of them!

sinzz wrote:
Stop putting the blame on others for absolutely everything - The thread is about your appeal and when Kronen gave his opinion on it, you derailed the thread with your nonsense regarding his own ban which has nothing to do with this topic at all. And you're in no position to draw the line and tell people what to do, in this specific situation, when to "stop". You started it, either shut up or contact the forum staff.

xDutchCat wrote: "And I declined his argument with a counterargument, but he persisted with his own point of view. I ended up following his reasoning by citing the fact that he was banned for scamming, which made my decision simple and effective."

Worker From Home wrote: it's not a reason to do it and even less to understand what it really means

Mr. Richard wrote: you should read my messages that I explained before rushing on this thank you and also don't thread me when you keept responding me and creat the argue, it's my thread not your so i suggest you stop commenting on it if you keept behave like this

Locking cause cringe. Expect an outcome soon

Slander me again and watch what happens French boy

Hello Sinz,

After discussing the matter with Clarky, we have come to the decision that you are not ready to be unbanned. You have clearly not learned from this, and it must be said that through your time here over the past few weeks, the disturbance you’ve caused other users has grown to the point where you’ve become considerably more problematic.

You’ve had numerous chances to accept some credibility for wrongdoing, but in every instance, you refuse to do so, and instead point the finger at others and blame them for your behaviour. This is highly concerning, and while most users might reflect and develop a self-awareness that allows that to consistently challenge their own transgressions, and actually say to themselves that they could be at fault – you instead choose to remain as you are, with there always being some convenient excuse as to why someone else needs to be the problem.

Your ban is not that long, you can survive without ZARP over the next couple of days, and please take some to consider your behaviours, and understand whether you have it in you to accept that you are not the judge, jury and executioner for everyone in the server.

Finally, please stop asserting that your opinion holds greater merit than a staff member’s. Just because you disagree with something they say does not mean that they are in the wrong, and that you are permitted to make them out as though they are not qualified to be doing their role. It’s a delusional, arrogant mindset that makes it very difficult to want to assist you.