TOPIC: [SSRP] Ban Appeal - Skiper

Time - How long were you banned for? 12/02/2023

Skiper wrote:

The recent ban of a good citizen player in the zarpgaming community is a clear violation of their rights as a player and demonstrates a concerning lack of fairness and impartiality within the administration. In this essay, I will argue that the player in question should be unbanned and that the decision to ban them highlights the broken state of democracy within the zarpgaming community.

First and foremost, it is crucial to acknowledge that the player was banned for an action that was not within the rules. This means that they were punished without just cause, violating the principle of innocence until proven guilty. The player in question was likely unaware of any wrongdoing, and yet they have been banned without any proper investigation or trial. This is a gross injustice that goes against the basic tenets of a fair and democratic society.

Furthermore, the player in question was known to be a good citizen within the zarpgaming community. They were a respected member of the community, and their behavior was never in question. To ban such a player without proper cause is not only unfair, but it also sends a message to the rest of the community that even those who abide by the rules and contribute positively can be punished without reason. This can have a significant impact on the morale and trust of the community, as players may no longer feel that their rights are being respected.

It is also worth noting that the decision to ban this player highlights the broken state of democracy within the zarpgaming community. In a fair and democratic society, decisions are made through a transparent process that involves the input of all stakeholders, including the players. However, in this instance, the player was banned without any chance to defend themselves or provide evidence of their innocence. This is a clear indication that the administration is not acting in a democratic manner, and that the voice of the players is not being heard.

To make a comparison, the unjust decision to ban this player is reminiscent of the French Revolution. During the revolution, the French people rose up against the tyranny and corruption of the monarchy and demanded a fair and just society. The ban of this player is a similar call to action, as it highlights the need for change and the importance of fair and impartial administration.

In conclusion, the ban of this good citizen player in the zarpgaming community is a gross injustice that must be addressed. The player in question should be unbanned and their rights as a player respected. The decision to ban them highlights the broken state of democracy within the zarpgaming community and serves as a call to action for the administration to address the concerns of the players and work towards creating a fair and just society.



Golden mummy suit,
Death by propeller trap awaits,
Tragedy strikes fast.