Forum

Login to ZARP

View BBCode Back »

Server Name: SSRP 1 & 2

Suggestion Title: Change the "BUILDING" sign rules.

How would it benefit the server: It would cause less confusion and problems regarding raids and raidable entities with a building sign.

Potential Issues/Exploits: None

Additional notes: Currently you are able to use a fake a building sign as the sign is required to be "BUILDING" in a large font to be counted as a valid building sign, if you make it "Buildinq" or something as such you are able to have raidable entities. I have seen this a few times and each time it has caused obvious problems. Both the general explanation of the rule an the rule itself are bad in my opinion and need a change. I feel it should be changed so all building signs are valid regardless of spelling errors as long as they are clear and visable. This will also mean that as long as something that clearly is a building sign is in place you may not use raidable entities. A recent situation where this was an issue is here linked below.

EDIT: As it seems people are being confused here, I am not talking about the usage of CAPS. I am talking about the changing of letters in the word building. This was stated to both players and staff as being allowed after being talked about by the lead team or so we were told. Would be nice to have an official statement on this from someone. I also changed the example of usage from building with a mission L to buildinq with the G replaced as people didn't see that the L was missing.

Please also look at this!

zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/general-d...ving-a-buildinq-sign

BBCode

[b]Server Name:[/b] [color=#0044ff][i]SSRP 1 & 2[/i][/color]

[b]Suggestion Title:[/b] [color=#0044ff][i]Change the "BUILDING" sign rules.[/i][/color]

[b]How would it benefit the server:[/b] [i][color=#0044ff]It would cause less confusion and problems regarding raids and raidable entities with a building sign.[/color][/i]

[b]Potential Issues/Exploits:[/b] [i][color=#0044ff]None[/color][/i]

[b]Additional notes:[/b] [i][color=#0044ff]Currently you are able to use a fake a building sign as the sign is required to be "BUILDING" in a large font to be counted as a valid building sign, if you make it "Buildinq" or something as such you are able to have raidable entities. I have seen this a few times and each time it has caused obvious problems. Both the general explanation of the rule an the rule itself are bad in my opinion and need a change. I feel it should be changed so all building signs are valid regardless of spelling errors as long as they are clear and visable. This will also mean that as long as something that clearly is a building sign is in place you may not use raidable entities. A recent situation where this was an issue is here linked below.[/color][/i]

[b][color=#bb0000]EDIT: As it seems people are being confused here, I am not talking about the usage of CAPS. I am talking about the changing of letters in the word building. This was stated to both players and staff as being allowed after being talked about by the lead team or so we were told. Would be nice to have an official statement on this from someone. I also changed the example of usage from building with a mission L to buildinq with the G replaced as people didn't see that the L was missing.[/color][/b]

[img]http://i.imgur.com/2Logjax.jpg[/img]

[b]Please also look at this![/b]

http://zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/general-discussion/52996-having-a-buildinq-sign

Forum

[SSRP Suggestion] "BUILDING" sign rules

View BBCode Back »

BBCode

Quick Menu

Menu

279 PLAYERS ONLINE

ZARP Discord & Steam Group