TOPIC: Having a "Buildinq" sign

Is writing a textscreen that says "Buildinq" with a lower Q , which is not spelling Building, counts as loopholing?
This is what redpowder said-
If it says "Building" on the sign it's a building sign if it says any thing else it's not
and it doesnt spell Building in any way

its fine i believe

Buildinq doesn't count as a Building sign. That I do know from DarkRP>

LineLiar wrote: It does.

EdenB wrote: I would consider it a troll building sign to trick people into thinking you are building but you are basing with printers inside and can be raided.

Holly Banker wrote: That must've been changed then, since last time I saw a demote request for a staff, who raided a building where the Building sign was misspelled. According to that, a misspelled building sign does not count as a real building sign. At least, that's what I remember. But very well, you're the SSRP admin.

LineLiar wrote: that is what I was tought when I got gmod and what other ssrp staff have told me, miss spelled building signs are fake building signs and is raid able. But every staff member makes there own rule about that some might allow it and some might not.

Learn how to spell BUILDING so we don't have problems and try to get staff demoted for raiding you because you was actually building but you spelled building wrong.

matthewdurbinmonday1998 wrote: I didn't? But ok.

LineLiar wrote: I was meaning that to everyone.

Currently it is allowed yes, many staff members used to do it and it's even specifically addressed in the rules it needs to be spelled correctly.

Its allowed to use that

ParaMontana wrote: Jerry said it is considered building sign.

4.21 - Textscreens

- Taken from the terms of use.So TL:DR the question to ask is; why would you need to do this?

If you can come up with a decent cause to place a sign with those letters, i would say its allowed, but if its only to mislead potential raiders then it is not.

Why don't you just post your steam ID and ask someone to ban you so it just speeds up the process because you are obviously looking for ways to loop hole the system. I know that you haven't been back to long and all I have heard is crap from you since you have made it known you're here/back.

RedPowder wrote: omfg I am confused here staff are saying yes it is allowed but red is saying it isn't and is considered loop holing


Can we please come up with a final answer for this plz so I know if it is allowed or not.

So is it allowed yes or no?

Yeah I will look at the rule tonight and make an official change to the rules of need be so people can stop trying to get their post count up because they had a bad time with a rule that didn't go their way.

This thread was so unnecessary its unbelievable you had already commented and looked at a post that was about the same situation.

-locked