Staff Member(s) Name: Xnator

Staff Member(s) SteamID: Not needed

What Did The Staff Member(s) do?: Warned me for a rule that did not exist at the time

What Server(s) Was This On?: Forums/TTT

Evidence and the story:
So on January this year I started my military service and was out of reach for about 6 months until I got sent to reserve. During this time I was obviously unable to play on the server so when I came back I had to re-learn the rules. I went through the rules with a fine comb and triple checked nothing was changed and the parts that were I noticed (For example I spotted a 1 word diffrence on the rule 1.7a which was that you were no longer allowed to shield yourself with props, which btw is something I still disagree with.)

After carefully going through all the rules I start hitting up my old contacts and asking if there are some things I needed to know and someone said the line: "You have to question people on why they killed an innocent" and logically I hit up a friend of mine House up asking about the rule in which he states the following

So in here House clearly says it isn't in the rules and hasnt been for a while (well I can prove it hasnt been since at least January of 2018 but more of that later)

Before asking House I had decided to go to the roots and ask what the situation was from the man himself Xnator. I asked him on Discord on June 27th (2 days before I asked House) and even to this day he still hasn't answered me


At the time of the incident the rule stated this


So the rule list, Server owner, past rulings that have been made (without any rule changes to that rule in between), and the handling staff member are on my side and ruling in my favour so what happens? Xnator comes and overrules and uses something that he just then said on TTT discord as proof that the rule exists. So if we were to tackle what Xnator states it has been changed since my resignation surely Dr.House as the server owner would know about that since he was on the staff team back then? Surely there would be a mention in the rule changes section of one of the meeting outcomes (I checked all of them and there are not), and surely the rule would have been reworded so that it included said section of this new rule?

Anyone missing the context this is the punishment request in question

Further proof of this being not a rule are here which is a report I made like a day afterwards as I had just accepted the rule at face value. If "someone does not have to ask why you killed an innocent", but "by no means is killing an inno in it's own KOSable it's killing an inno and not giving a reason for it" how does the rule even work? Spoiler it really doesnt it was just made on the spot by Xnator to settle some score he had with me.



So from January of 2018 to when I resigned the rule was that killing an innocent is KOSable (as it should be) which is something I personally can confirm and from that point Kurze or House were on the staff (and more specifically lead) team until this situation occured so there is no way this rule was changed without them knowing.

TL;DR: Xnator warned me for a rule that didnt exist and I had already double checked that th erule didnt exist by asking him and the server owner

Extra: I wish for DEADMONSTOR and Clarky to not handle this. Their feedback is still welcome if they can follow the TOU.

DEAD and I already had an extensive discussion about the situation and didnt end up having any sort of agreement and I cant believe he is impartial so hence why I don't want him handling.

And Clarky has always failed to act civil towards me so I do not want him making any decisions in my reports.

Last side note: I find it funny when the Developer starts making rules and overruling staff members

[b]Staff Member(s) Name:[/b] Xnator [b]Staff Member(s) SteamID:[/b] Not needed [b]What Did The Staff Member(s) do?:[/b] Warned me for a rule that did not exist at the time [b]What Server(s) Was This On?:[/b] Forums/TTT [b]Evidence and the story:[/b] So on January this year I started my military service and was out of reach for about 6 months until I got sent to reserve. During this time I was obviously unable to play on the server so when I came back I had to re-learn the rules. I went through the rules with a fine comb and triple checked nothing was changed and the parts that were I noticed (For example I spotted a 1 word diffrence on the rule 1.7a which was that you were no longer allowed to shield yourself with props, which btw is something I still disagree with.) After carefully going through all the rules I start hitting up my old contacts and asking if there are some things I needed to know and someone said the line: "You have to question people on why they killed an innocent" and logically I hit up a friend of mine House up asking about the rule in which he states the following [spoiler] REMOVED PROOF P.S don't mind the language used by either of us neither of us had the intention of this ever getting out but I decided i have to defend myself[/spoiler] So in here House clearly says it isn't in the rules and hasnt been for a while (well I can prove it hasnt been since at least January of 2018 but more of that later) Before asking House I had decided to go to the roots and ask what the situation was from the man himself Xnator. I asked him on Discord on June 27th (2 days before I asked House) and even to this day he still hasn't answered me [spoiler=proof]https://i.imgur.com/9ZpxnM0.jpg At this point I had already went further than anyone would ever go to confirm a rule, but he ignored me.[/spoiler] At the time of the incident the rule stated this [spoiler] https://i.imgur.com/nLevVgz.jpg The changed version was applied in the meeting following my incident and at the time the current 2.1 rule was actually even worded by me. Which btw is still better than the current one if you ask me, but thats a discussion for amother day[/spoiler] So the rule list, Server owner, [url=https://i.imgur.com/oGPZNf9.jpg] past rulings[/url] that have been made (without any rule changes to that rule in between), and the handling staff member are on my side and ruling in my favour so what happens? Xnator comes and [url=https://i.imgur.com/oGPZNf9.jpg] overrules and uses something that he just then said on TTT discord as proof that the rule exists.[/url] So if we were to tackle what Xnator states it has been changed since my resignation surely Dr.House as the server owner would know about that since he was on the staff team back then? Surely there would be a mention in the rule changes section of one of the meeting outcomes (I checked all of them and there are not), and surely the rule would have been reworded so that it included said section of this new rule? [Url=https://zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/report-abuse/146220-ttt-punishment-request-lonelydodo?start=20#forumbottom]Anyone missing the context this is the punishment request in question[/url] Further proof of this being not a rule are [url=https://zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/report-abuse/146255-ttt-punishment-request-pootis-bird-md#1140205]here[/url] which is a report I made like a day afterwards as I had just accepted the rule at face value. If "someone does not have to ask why you killed an innocent", but "by no means is killing an inno in it's own KOSable it's killing an inno and not giving a reason for it" how does the rule even work? Spoiler it really doesnt it was just made on the spot by Xnator to settle some score he had with me. [Spoiler=Speculation]Not sure why he had it out for me it might be the fact that when I first got staff I forced him to resign from TTT before getting demoted by me and Johnler (he was time farming and not doing anything on the server and I just recorded it and other stuff) or it might be because at the CM campaign back at Raeker I revealed that he lied during the debate, or it might be that I managed to break his code on so many occasions.... Honestly I don't even know if it's just that he didn't like me, but a rule that is enforcable to get back at someone you don't like obviously cannot exist. But as this is speculation it should be ignored [/spoiler] So from January of 2018 to when I resigned the rule was that killing an innocent is KOSable (as it should be) which is something I personally can confirm and from that point Kurze or House were on the staff (and more specifically lead) team until this situation occured so there is no way this rule was changed without them knowing. TL;DR: Xnator warned me for a rule that didnt exist and I had already double checked that th erule didnt exist by asking him and the server owner Extra: I wish for DEADMONSTOR and Clarky to not handle this. Their feedback is still welcome if they can follow the TOU. DEAD and I already had an extensive discussion about the situation and didnt end up having any sort of agreement and I cant believe he is impartial so hence why I don't want him handling. And Clarky has always failed to act civil towards me so I do not want him making any decisions in my reports. Last side note: I find it funny when the Developer starts making rules and overruling staff members