TOPIC: [SSRP] Jenga's Ban Appeal (Repost)

I got banned for 6 day for having 16 recents but i got banned for 3 days it was i thick Thursday and i came back Sunday and i got 1 warns and Monday i got 1 warn win i got banned on Thursday i should have 0 warn but the and said i had 16 recents?.

It's not the raiders responsibility to make sure you don't repaste, it's your responsibility to check if you can repaste. If the staff members told you to repaste and if they were not present at the situation, they have no right to say repaste. I do not know how it was, but that's just how I see it. If they did tell you to repaste though and no one was raiding while you got told this.
I was not present therefore I can't tell wether it was appropriate or not. I would handle this, but you prefer an SA to do it.

Overall Jenga. You know your loopholes and how to use them correctly, trying to escape every sit with them. If you had recents (7+) this ban is well deserved.

just unban this dude

The repaste may be in question but I believe the 3 days is justified with the recent punishments on your record. Anyway, good luck with the appeal!

hazzenator wrote:
Now... 2 unwarn appeals have been accepted, so as of now I have no recents related to repasting during a raid (the warn and kick have been removed)

By the time this appeal gets handled you will be unbanned

he gonna give me nano suit ^^



right???

tbh, all my play time i learn something during basing, if the raidairs aren't active you can repaste after a short while, like there is no rule about repasting with non-active raiders, a rule about this should be really helpfull to avoid theses "Dramas"
I was on S2 when this drama happened, repasting because raiders aren't active is not punishable because there is no rule about this.

Patch3 wrote:
?

MyNameBrokeTOU wrote: he got banned for 6 days for having 16 recents but he got banned for 3 days it was he thick Thrusday and he came back Sunday and he got 1 warns and monday he got 1 warn won, he got banned on Thursday, he should have 0 warn but the said he had 16 recents

Patch3 wrote: After being unbanned, your warns that you earned after being banned aren't removed.. you need to wait two weeks ~

I'm still trying to contact BK, expect to get an answer in the next couple of hours.

UNBAN THIS KID

He did the best thing to get rid of the base to raid LOL
I feel bad for Jenga, people donate him ye? I'll do too!

Why isn't this accepted yet fucking hell, he was given permission by 2 admins and the raiders disregarded what they said and just wanted to ban another defender, these raiders legit did everything in their power to keep the raid active, including loopholing and various other rulebreaks

Sada wrote: Sada, he has no proof of them permitting as well as they could've not been present there.

Tilin wrote:
If you bothered to watch the video called "repaste" you would hear both chad and cherry say repaste.
@ 2:10 in this video.

Tip: actually bother to watch the evidence before posting again.

give to my jenga

ToBeHonest wrote: Thats not true and I suggest you reread the rules.EMP wrote: The terminology is very specific and it states you can not build during a raid. A raid is a raid while all of the raiders are alive and not restricted by NLR. This is done so that it requires the defenders to actively seek out and destroy the raiders.

Unless you verified that you had indeed put all the raiders on NLR then you should not have repasted regardless of if someome told you to. At the end of the day its up to you to make sure your not breaking rules and unless your absolutely sure the raid is over you shouldn't repaste. I would also like to point out that no rule states that the raid times out affter 30 seconds of no action. The raiders very well could have been trying to relocate themselves or regroup for another assault.