Login to ZARP

TOPIC: Request to take another look at a report

Request to take another look at a report 7 years 10 months ago #700931

Sally wrote:

Building during a raid is not allowed for either party so the rule itself is a little stupid as the prop should be placed before and initiate a raid rather than during.

5.6 Building - Building or rebuilding during a raid is not allowed. Any repairs must be done once the raid has ended. A single prop may be placed during a raid in order to block a camera but this should be removed once the raid has ended.

RFlex
Offline
Legendary Member
whats up
Posts: 5684
Thanks received: 996
Karma: -60

The topic has been locked.

View BBCode

The following user(s) said Thank You: SwiiFTz, AceInsidious

Request to take another look at a report 7 years 10 months ago #700977

The wording of the rule stipulates that the action of placing a prop is only exempt from the rule if it occurs once per raid. No where does it mention that the removal of said prop is valid grounds for a replacement.

A single prop may be placed during a raid

The word "during" here defines the timeframe in which only one prop may be placed as being the entire raid. Therefore it is heavily implied that the original intention was only allowing a raider one prop.

That'll be $30,000 in legal feels thank you.

exrobite
Offline
Loyal Boarder
dont have a cow man
Posts: 8911
Thanks received: 2493
Karma: -31

Last Edit: 7 years 10 months ago by exrobite.

The topic has been locked.

View BBCode

The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker

Request to take another look at a report 7 years 10 months ago #700999

exrobite wrote:

The wording of the rule stipulates that the action of placing a prop is only exempt from the rule if it occurs once per raid. No where does it mention that the removal of said prop is valid grounds for a replacement.

A single prop may be placed during a raid

The word "during" here defines the timeframe in which only one prop may be placed as being the entire raid. Therefore it is heavily implied that the original intention was only allowing a raider one prop.

That'll be $30,000 in legal feels thank you.

Thank you. I tried to explain it like how you did it, that the action of placing a prop is the rule and not the prop itself, but I didn't manage to word it as clearly as you did.

Raeker
Offline
Former Community Manager
It hurts the best of us
Posts: 9175
Thanks received: 6576
Karma: 213

Add me on Steam here!

The topic has been locked.

View BBCode

Request to take another look at a report 7 years 10 months ago #701117

What Exrobite said is correct, the rule allows for a player to at one single point in the raid place down a prop to block a camera. Removing that prop and placing down another one during the same rule is not allowed. I've unlocked the report and I'll inform Ace of how the rule works.	Legendary Soldier Offline Former Community Manager Still alive bois Posts: 2606 Thanks received: 1434 Karma: 61
Former Community Manager Last Edit: 7 years 10 months ago by Legendary Soldier. The topic has been locked. View BBCode The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker

Request to take another look at a report 7 years 10 months ago #701121

Tyler Durden wrote: What Exrobite said is correct, the rule allows for a player to at one single point in the raid place down a prop to block a camera. Removing that prop and placing down another one during the same rule is not allowed. I've unlocked the report and I'll inform Ace of how the rule works. Thank you. This thread can now be locked.	Raeker Offline Former Community Manager It hurts the best of us Posts: 9175 Thanks received: 6576 Karma: 213
Add me on Steam here! The topic has been locked. View BBCode