Server Name:
Zarp TTT
Suggestion Title:
Removing the new CS:GO weapons
How would it benefit the server:
This is the buggiest weapon pack I've ever seen.
Potential Issues/Exploits:
None.
Additional notes:
Alright, this is just a list of a few the current bugs with the new weapons (there are more than listed):
General issues:
- When you drop any of the new weapons, they float in mid-air
- The weapons aren't added yet to the FastDL
- You can reload instantly
- The weapons have really low recoil
- The weapons are generally way stronger than their CS:S counterpart
- The weapons make an equip sound/animation every time you shoot them.
SSG 08 (the least buggy weapon in the pack):
- The damage is way better compared to the rifle (87 to 50)
- For every 11 shots a SSG fires, a rifle fires 10 (hand-tested, not accurate)
- When you aim down sights you sometimes see the weapon in the top left of the screen.
- When you hold it's in your body, not in your hands.
Let's look at one of the automatic weapons, for example the Famas:
- The damage is way better on paper than the CS:S Famas
- You can't deal ANY damage when you shoot someone.
- The firerate is way higher than the CS:S famas
- It has 30 ammo instead of 25
- Automatics don't do any damage.
I could list all of the bugs, but why would I need to do that when most of the weapons don't even fire properly?
That's pretty much it. You could leave your opinion, but anyone who will test out the weapons will agree that they are bugged beyond fixing. We need to remove the pack or switch to one that works. Tested in singleplayer. You could fix all the weapons, but that would take way more effort than picking a new pack.
Credit to LineLiar for helping out
EDIT:
Ace suggested for
this to be added instead, but I doubt that would be a good idea, because quoting the description of the addon:
I don't recomend you to download this if you like any CS:S Weapons, because they will screw up the textures and sounds.
If we would take this pack instead of the current one, we need to test if it really does that and if it does, we need to find another option. I will be searching for an alternative, just in case.