TOPIC: [PERP] Conflicting Rules

Server Name: PERP

Suggestion Title: Rules

How would it benefit the server: See 'Additional Notes'.

Potential Issues/Exploits: None.

Additional notes:

Rule 3.8 is currently too specific, and is mainly covered by what is described in rule 3.2. The issue here is that guns in PERP are used a lot differently to the way in which they are used on DarkRP, and I see that this rule has been mainly derived from the current DarkRP rules.

This limits people's roleplay, and therefore it should be more a case of what is prescribed under rule 3.2 as not only what is described under 3.8 will be a risk to one's life: it's a much broader matter.

My suggestion is that the 3.8 rule should be completely removed, 3.2 serves the purpose as it is.

Use the template, I think that you know where you can find that

Wiz_Khalifa wrote:
Chris, head of ZARP, gets called out.
GGWP

Personally, I think you and your PERP is already way too specific and complicated.

ReaperRoel wrote:
*Christopher Andrews, Head of ZAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaAAAAAAAAArp

Wiz_Khalifa wrote:
'Have a suggestion for any of our servers?'

There is no active server at the moment for PERP according to gametracker; the template doesn't apply under these circumstances.

Chris wrote: Actually there is an active server, its just locked and has a different name, so in a sense, template does apply mr. literal

Well just use the Template and everyone is happy.

KV-Twoerminator wrote:
So's you and your communism.

SabreTooth wrote:
So's you and your capitalism and ignorance

Morgan wrote:
Let's do dis

Time to put on my war music

KV-Twoerminator wrote:
When can a thread that contains a post from you stay on topic? I made one post to take the piss out of communism, and you start it into a political debate. Please, may we stay on the topic of the PERP rules, and stop spamming your stupid music.

SabreTooth wrote:
Well you could've just ignored his comment instead of quoting him. #JustSaying

SabreTooth wrote:
Such wrongness with this

Well, first of all - it can stay on topic if you want to. I just say that PERP is way too complicated and specific for me, which is kind of off-topic, but not really - then you just bring in the thread how my communism is specific is complicated. Oh my, I'm going off topic I guess.

Also, I never started a political debate, or it would really be on. When I do political debates, I do brick wall's of text.

Again, you started going off-topic, I was just defending myself, also getting one link on isn't spamming.

I'm kinda ashamed you feel like this towards communism - which is just ignornant.

Brusk_Macaroon wrote:
I was initially unaware, thank you for bringing this to my attention - I appreciate your unconditional passion for the community, keep it up!

this has nothing to do with communism etc guys, leave it on another thread!
Anyways, your idea is great chris, I +support this and everything that you say!
#gochris