TOPIC: SSRP Suggestion - Hitman and Holstering

Lyra wrote:
What does that have to do with this suggestion??

-gmini

Sam Winchester wrote:
What does ANYTHING you've said had to do with this suggestion, you've only spouted random crap with no relation to this suggestion. I am making a comparison and a counter argument to bobby.

Lyra wrote:
You compared a server restart to a job setting lol

Sam Winchester wrote:
Yes, because they have the same feature. They both should holster weapons when they happen. They both refund instant holster items when they occur, what's your point?

orbadoc wrote: Because he's just arguing with sam

Lewis_is_java wrote: Well, I'm trying to argue my point, which means I have to argue with Sam.

Lyra wrote: this is your point "Yes, because they have the same feature. They both should holster weapons when they happen. They both refund instant holster items when they occur, what's your point?"

they obviously don't have the same feature otherwise this wouldn't be a suggestion would it

Lewis_is_java wrote: I said "should" for a reason. Even if people are saying that the hitman thing is "intentional" it's obvious that it isn't intentional. The drug dealer job has the same effect as the hitman, but it holsters weapons as intended, like every single other job. This is a suggestion, because people are saying it's intended, when clearly it isn't.

Lyra wrote: Yeah you say should as if it's meant to, this isn't a suggestion then, it's a bug report.

Did not realise the drug dealer job is also the hitman job

Lewis_is_java wrote:
Okay, so what if it's a suggestion or a bug report? They can handle it the same for either situation.

Also, why should it matter that their different jobs. I go back to my point of consistency and your arguement that "it isn't consistent because this specific spawn tp effect" doesn't hold due to the drug dealer job. So I ask this, why are you so against this being implemented/fixed? What NEGATIVES does this cause?

Lyra wrote: I didn't say the tp thing had anything to do with it, I've said job consistency seems like a shit reason for implementation. and it does make a difference, if it's a suggestion make a good reason for it to be suggested, but you think it's a bug and that's your point for it to be implemented and you only think this because other jobs act differently, have you even bothered to ask a developer or owner if it's a bug like you think, it would save you a lot of time and arguing kidda

Lewis_is_java wrote:
Okay, so you think that random jobs having the holster feature and others not randomly is a good thing for the server? So, If the theif job didn't holster but the gangster did you wouldn't mind that?

Also the argument isn't really about if it's a bug or not, I'm just interested in this being fixed or implemented. I have talked to them and they say it's intentional, but I can argue that it isn't, but in the end it doesn't matter like I said.

Lyra wrote: Yeah I do think it's good if it's intentional then it's for a reason, and I wouldn't mind no but that isn't the case.

and if an owner does say it's intentional then of course it matters because then it's not a bug is it so it doesn't need to be "fixed"

"This is a suggestion, because people are saying it's intended, when clearly it isn't."

so who's right? you or the owner?

Lewis_is_java wrote:
So what's the reason for this being the case? The owners just say "it's intentional" and haven't give no reason. There aren't any clear differences between jobs apart from the respawn effect, which for the drug dealer job still has this feature, so that is also not a reason for this being the case.

For this being a bug or a "intended" feature and it being fixed or implemented, it's just semantics and shouldn't matter. I don't care who's right, I just want this to be fixed or implemented, that's the whole reason I made this post.

EDIT: Also where I say drug dealer i mean drug runner