Login to ZARP

TOPIC: zarp suggestion

zarp suggestion 4 years 5 months ago #1177719

Server Name:
www.zarpgaming.com
Suggestion Title:
make it so you only can object twice
How would it benefit the server:
would make it so someone cant just keep on objecting because if lets say jmt would object all the time and just keeps the meeting going until you just deny that one person weeks in a row
Potential Issues/Exploits:
none that i can see
Additional notes:
its a bad explanation but i feel like its good enough

maybedovahkitty
Offline
User is blocked
Бог мертв
Posts: 7710
Thanks received: 1226
Karma: -74

Most people are searching for happiness. They’re looking for it. They’re trying to find it in someone or something outside of themselves. That’s a fundamental mistake. Happiness is something that you are, and it comes from the way you think.

The topic has been locked.

The following user(s) said Thank You: Harry RDM Squatta

zarp suggestion 4 years 5 months ago #1177720

	Harry RDM Squatta Offline Expert Boarder Ex TTT Superadmin \| Ex Deathrun Admin Posts: 1169 Thanks received: 294 Karma: -18
Ex TTT Super Admin Ex Deathrun Admin The topic has been locked.

zarp suggestion 4 years 5 months ago #1177725

I made this suggestion ages ago but I don't think it ever got looked into. If you read the policies the meeting rules do actually say that a participant may not object more than once under the same reason. Realistically that should prevent any issues but it never does seem to as it's often loopholed by people who will just make a new, almost identical reason every time until the vote is swayed. Limiting the amount of times an individual can object, regardless of their reasoning, is probably a better way of going about it to prevent that from happening and ensure votes are fair and not biased.

eddie.
Offline
Adept Boarder
fuck
Posts: 6128
Thanks received: 1742
Karma: 48

✥ Ex Deathrun Super Administrator ✥
✥ Ex TTT Super Administrator ✥
✥ Ex SSRP Administrator ✥
✥ Ex TeamSpeak Staff ✥
✥ Ex Discord Staff ✥
✥ Ex Forum Staff ✥

Steam-Click here!

Last Edit: 4 years 5 months ago by eddie..

The topic has been locked.

zarp suggestion 4 years 5 months ago #1177726

harry is going fucking wild rn	Chespin Offline Legendary Member stay outta tha fiyah Posts: 2229 Thanks received: 1336 Karma: -135
Ex-TTT Super Administrator Ex-Prop Hunt Super Administrator x2 Ex-Team Fortress 2 Super Administrator Ex-TTT Administrator x3 Ex-Community Council Member Ex-Server Applications Forum Mod The topic has been locked.

zarp suggestion 4 years 5 months ago #1177731

Just bring dcx back to the lead team	A Good Pianist Offline Spectacular Boarder A Wob A Bob Bob Posts: 15000 Thanks received: 3914 Karma: 22
The topic has been locked.

zarp suggestion 4 years 5 months ago #1177775

Eddie. wrote:

I made this suggestion ages ago but I don't think it ever got looked into. If you read the policies the meeting rules do actually say that a participant may not object more than once under the same reason. Realistically that should prevent any issues but it never does seem to as it's often loopholed by people who will just make a new, almost identical reason every time until the vote is swayed. Limiting the amount of times an individual can object, regardless of their reasoning, is probably a better way of going about it to prevent that from happening and ensure votes are fair and not biased.

but people abuse that and give a slightly different or different reason everytime

Harry RDM Squatta
Offline
Expert Boarder
Ex TTT Superadmin | Ex Deathrun Admin
Posts: 1169
Thanks received: 294
Karma: -18

Ex TTT Super Admin
Ex Deathrun Admin

The topic has been locked.

zarp suggestion 4 years 5 months ago #1177778

Harry RDM Squatta wrote:

Eddie. wrote:

I made this suggestion ages ago but I don't think it ever got looked into. If you read the policies the meeting rules do actually say that a participant may not object more than once under the same reason. Realistically that should prevent any issues but it never does seem to as it's often loopholed by people who will just make a new, almost identical reason every time until the vote is swayed. Limiting the amount of times an individual can object, regardless of their reasoning, is probably a better way of going about it to prevent that from happening and ensure votes are fair and not biased.

but people abuse that and give a slightly different or different reason everytime

that’s exactly what i wrote

eddie.
Offline
Adept Boarder
fuck
Posts: 6128
Thanks received: 1742
Karma: 48

✥ Ex Deathrun Super Administrator ✥
✥ Ex TTT Super Administrator ✥
✥ Ex SSRP Administrator ✥
✥ Ex TeamSpeak Staff ✥
✥ Ex Discord Staff ✥
✥ Ex Forum Staff ✥

Steam-Click here!

The topic has been locked.

zarp suggestion 4 years 5 months ago #1177783

Harry RDM Squatta wrote:

Eddie. wrote:

I made this suggestion ages ago but I don't think it ever got looked into. If you read the policies the meeting rules do actually say that a participant may not object more than once under the same reason. Realistically that should prevent any issues but it never does seem to as it's often loopholed by people who will just make a new, almost identical reason every time until the vote is swayed. Limiting the amount of times an individual can object, regardless of their reasoning, is probably a better way of going about it to prevent that from happening and ensure votes are fair and not biased.

but people abuse that and give a slightly different or different reason everytime

i used to do that

Kaiwaii
Offline
Gold Boarder
Naruto >
Posts: 1798
Thanks received: 2160
Karma: 26

Ex Deathrun Super Admin
Ex Bhop Super Admin
Ex Prop Hunt Admin
Ex SSRP Moderator
Ex Murder UNTRAINED Moderator

The topic has been locked.

The following user(s) said Thank You: Tamaninja

zarp suggestion 4 years 5 months ago #1178107

should be a thing	Harry RDM Squatta Offline Expert Boarder Ex TTT Superadmin \| Ex Deathrun Admin Posts: 1169 Thanks received: 294 Karma: -18
Ex TTT Super Admin Ex Deathrun Admin The topic has been locked.

zarp suggestion 4 years 5 months ago #1178113

I do believe the objection rules need to be looked at. There has been many cases where this has been abused because one member of a staff team has a strong opinion about someone, whether good or bad.

I don't think there should be a limit on the amount of times you can object though, but objections that are blatantly delaying the meeting and swaying the votes purely because of the time spent voting should be disallowed.

Then again, I guess that's the point in having the power to object in the first place. /shrug

Jim_Jam
Offline
Former Community Manager
TTT is my child ❤️
Posts: 8585
Thanks received: 3491
Karma: -32

The topic has been locked.

zarp suggestion 4 years 5 months ago #1178124

Jim_Jam wrote:

I do believe the objection rules need to be looked at. There has been many cases where this has been abused because one member of a staff team has a strong opinion about someone, whether good or bad.

I don't think there should be a limit on the amount of times you can object though, but objections that are blatantly delaying the meeting and swaying the votes purely because of the time spent voting should be disallowed.

Then again, I guess that's the point in having the power to object in the first place. /shrug

Objection

A Good Pianist
Offline
Spectacular Boarder
A Wob A Bob Bob
Posts: 15000
Thanks received: 3914
Karma: 22

The topic has been locked.

The following user(s) said Thank You: Jim_Jam, maybedovahkitty

zarp suggestion 4 years 5 months ago #1178197

Jim_Jam wrote:

I do believe the objection rules need to be looked at. There has been many cases where this has been abused because one member of a staff team has a strong opinion about someone, whether good or bad.

I don't think there should be a limit on the amount of times you can object though, but objections that are blatantly delaying the meeting and swaying the votes purely because of the time spent voting should be disallowed.

Then again, I guess that's the point in having the power to object in the first place. /shrug

si

Harry RDM Squatta
Offline
Expert Boarder
Ex TTT Superadmin | Ex Deathrun Admin
Posts: 1169
Thanks received: 294
Karma: -18

Ex TTT Super Admin
Ex Deathrun Admin

The topic has been locked.

zarp suggestion 4 years 5 months ago #1178199

To be fair this is something meeting hosts should already be dealing with, if some staff member wants to keep objecting for retarded / the same reasons just slightly changed, then they should just be removed. No rules need changing people just need to stop letting people chat shit and object for reasons just because it's not going their way it's really not hard	luke_ Offline Legendary Member -0121- Posts: 2131 Thanks received: 1139 Karma: 9
"R.I.P. Born In Blood" - March the first 2016... First Seen: Dec 08, 2013 6:54 PM . The topic has been locked. The following user(s) said Thank You: Latram, maybedovahkitty, jack bushross

zarp suggestion 4 years 5 months ago #1178204

luke_ wrote:

To be fair this is something meeting hosts should already be dealing with, if some staff member wants to keep objecting for retarded / the same reasons just slightly changed, then they should just be removed.

No rules need changing people just need to stop letting people chat shit and object for reasons just because it's not going their way it's really not hard

You know shit is getting real when you see this boi come out.

jack bushross
Offline
Former Community Manager
Posts: 2154
Thanks received: 4930
Karma: 29

SSRP- Super Administrator

The topic has been locked.

The following user(s) said Thank You: schnitzel nazi, Micky

zarp suggestion 4 years 5 months ago #1178228

jack bushrsos wrote:

luke_ wrote:

To be fair this is something meeting hosts should already be dealing with, if some staff member wants to keep objecting for retarded / the same reasons just slightly changed, then they should just be removed.

No rules need changing people just need to stop letting people chat shit and object for reasons just because it's not going their way it's really not hard

You know shit is getting real when you see this boi come out.

Come out the closet???

A Good Pianist
Offline
Spectacular Boarder
A Wob A Bob Bob
Posts: 15000
Thanks received: 3914
Karma: 22

The topic has been locked.

zarp suggestion 4 years 5 months ago #1178341

If someone is objecting too much or clearly trolling, the meeting host is within their rights to remove them from the meeting.	TheXnator Offline Former Owner "Save the tears for when we win!" Posts: 8122 Thanks received: 4300 Karma: -2023
Discord: thexnator Former Community Owner: 2020-2022 The topic has been locked.