Login to ZARP

TOPIC: [SSRP] Rule change

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169474

Server Name:
Semi Serious Roleplay

Suggestion Title:
Change the spawn building rule

How would it benefit the server:
Help stopping loophole in the rule

Potential Issues/Exploits:
N/A

Additional notes:

Here is the rule that is currently active

4.25a Restricted Buildings Server 1 - Raiding is not permitted in the shop buildings in spawn on server one. Illegal entities are also not allowed inside these buildings. Entities such as Shipments, HP/Armor Chargers, etc are allowed.

Here is what I suggest it states

4.25a Restricted Buildings Server 1 - Raiding is not permitted in the shop buildings in spawn on server one. Raidable entities such as (Printers,Druglabs,Drug Plants,Melon and Carrot plants) are also not allowed inside these buildings. Entities such as Shipments, HP/Armor Chargers, etc are allowed.

XxmasterxX
Offline
Diamond Boarder
PartyKing!
Posts: 3990
Thanks received: 716
Karma: -3

Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169476

You can't be arrested for growing melons or carrots though... An illegal entity will make the owner wanted when scanned.	.uzi Offline Former Community Manager Foos yer doos? Posts: 6007 Thanks received: 2443 Karma: 123
Last Edit: 4 years 11 months ago by .uzi. Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169480

.uzi wrote: You can't be arrested for growing melons or carrots though... An illegal entity will make the owner wanted when scanned. Well yes but apparently its raidable and cannot be raided if its in the buildings at spawn and Markus told me off for it	XxmasterxX Offline Diamond Boarder PartyKing! Posts: 3990 Thanks received: 716 Karma: -3
Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169481

.uzi wrote: You can't be arrested for growing melons or carrots though... An illegal entity will make the owner wanted when scanned. Yes but as you are not allowed to raid those buildings, allowing someone to essentially "base" with 0 risk should not be allowed.	Markus Offline Legendary Member Posts: 5349 Thanks received: 1634 Karma: -337
Former: SSRP Superadmin Community Council Creator (May it rest in piece) Prophunt Moderator BHOP Moderator Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169483

Markus Chellwigg wrote:

.uzi wrote:

You can't be arrested for growing melons or carrots though...

An illegal entity will make the owner wanted when scanned.

Yes but as you are not allowed to raid those buildings, allowing someone to essentially "base" with 0 risk should not be allowed.

They're not illegal entities. They are not prohibited by the rule.

But those bases still can't be raided anyway

.uzi
Offline
Former Community Manager
Foos yer doos?
Posts: 6007
Thanks received: 2443
Karma: 123

Last Edit: 4 years 11 months ago by .uzi.

Login or register to post a reply.

The following user(s) said Thank You: XxmasterxX

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169484

XxmasterxX wrote:

.uzi wrote:

You can't be arrested for growing melons or carrots though...

An illegal entity will make the owner wanted when scanned.

Well yes but apparently its raidable and cannot be raided if its in the buildings at spawn and Markus told me off for it

You raided someone which was just growing melons and carrots. I dont see the harm in keeping the rules the same, it's not like carrots and melons do much harm or make any money. But eh.

Spectrum
Offline
Diamond Boarder
quack
Posts: 4104
Thanks received: 845
Karma: -206

Ex Deathrun Server Owner
Ex SSRP Head Admin
Ex TS / Discord Head Admin
Ex Forum Section Moderator
Ex Community Council Member

My Anime List
Steam | Discord: Spectrum#0001

Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169485

.uzi wrote:

Markus Chellwigg wrote:

.uzi wrote:

You can't be arrested for growing melons or carrots though...

An illegal entity will make the owner wanted when scanned.

Yes but as you are not allowed to raid those buildings, allowing someone to essentially "base" with 0 risk should not be allowed.

They're not illegal entities. They are not prohibited by the rule.

So you mean to tell me that people can base without any risk?

Markus
Offline
Legendary Member
Posts: 5349
Thanks received: 1634
Karma: -337

Former:
SSRP Superadmin
Community Council Creator (May it rest in piece)
Prophunt Moderator
BHOP Moderator

Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169486

Markus Chellwigg wrote:

.uzi wrote:

Markus Chellwigg wrote:

.uzi wrote:

You can't be arrested for growing melons or carrots though...

An illegal entity will make the owner wanted when scanned.

Yes but as you are not allowed to raid those buildings, allowing someone to essentially "base" with 0 risk should not be allowed.

They're not illegal entities. They are not prohibited by the rule.

So you mean to tell me that people can base without any risk?

That's what the rule says /shrug

.uzi
Offline
Former Community Manager
Foos yer doos?
Posts: 6007
Thanks received: 2443
Karma: 123

Login or register to post a reply.

The following user(s) said Thank You: Spectrum

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169487

.uzi wrote:

Markus Chellwigg wrote:

.uzi wrote:

Markus Chellwigg wrote:

.uzi wrote:

You can't be arrested for growing melons or carrots though...

An illegal entity will make the owner wanted when scanned.

Yes but as you are not allowed to raid those buildings, allowing someone to essentially "base" with 0 risk should not be allowed.

They're not illegal entities. They are not prohibited by the rule.

So you mean to tell me that people can base without any risk?

That's what the rule says /shrug

Rules also say alot of other loophole-filled things?

Markus
Offline
Legendary Member
Posts: 5349
Thanks received: 1634
Karma: -337

Former:
SSRP Superadmin
Community Council Creator (May it rest in piece)
Prophunt Moderator
BHOP Moderator

Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169488

Markus Chellwigg wrote:

.uzi wrote:

Markus Chellwigg wrote:

.uzi wrote:

Markus Chellwigg wrote:

.uzi wrote:

You can't be arrested for growing melons or carrots though...

An illegal entity will make the owner wanted when scanned.

Yes but as you are not allowed to raid those buildings, allowing someone to essentially "base" with 0 risk should not be allowed.

They're not illegal entities. They are not prohibited by the rule.

So you mean to tell me that people can base without any risk?

That's what the rule says /shrug

Rules also say alot of other loophole-filled things?

Then suggest changes to them?

Don't really understand what's loop holey about this rule in particular, it's pretty much black and white.

.uzi
Offline
Former Community Manager
Foos yer doos?
Posts: 6007
Thanks received: 2443
Karma: 123

Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169489

Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]

I am suggesting the rule change since I all I read illegal entities and got told off for having growing melons in there.

XxmasterxX
Offline
Diamond Boarder
PartyKing!
Posts: 3990
Thanks received: 716
Karma: -3

Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169561

Markus Chellwigg wrote:

.uzi wrote:

Markus Chellwigg wrote:

.uzi wrote:

You can't be arrested for growing melons or carrots though...

An illegal entity will make the owner wanted when scanned.

Yes but as you are not allowed to raid those buildings, allowing someone to essentially "base" with 0 risk should not be allowed.

They're not illegal entities. They are not prohibited by the rule.

So you mean to tell me that people can base without any risk?

You literally get fuck all from carrots and melons, why even bother if people are genuinely basing to get money from it. Just wasting their time lmao

Kyber
Offline
Legendary Member
Something original and funny
Posts: 8485
Thanks received: 2620
Karma: -125

Legendary Member

Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169566

.uzi wrote:

Markus Chellwigg wrote:

.uzi wrote:

Markus Chellwigg wrote:

.uzi wrote:

You can't be arrested for growing melons or carrots though...

An illegal entity will make the owner wanted when scanned.

Yes but as you are not allowed to raid those buildings, allowing someone to essentially "base" with 0 risk should not be allowed.

They're not illegal entities. They are not prohibited by the rule.

So you mean to tell me that people can base without any risk?

That's what the rule says /shrug

Only melon and carrots anyways, not a big deal and can be changed this Saturday

Clarky
Offline
Former Community Manager
I love Henny
Posts: 16798
Thanks received: 9579
Karma: 983

Login or register to post a reply.

The following user(s) said Thank You: XxmasterxX

TOPIC: [SSRP] Rule change

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169474

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169476

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169480

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169481

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169483

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169484

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169485

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169486

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169487

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169488

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169489

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169561

[SSRP] Rule change 4 years 11 months ago #1169566

Quick Menu

Menu

244 PLAYERS ONLINE

ZARP Discord & Steam Group