Login to ZARP

TOPIC: [SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7

[SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7 7 years 1 day ago #907724

Server Name:

SSRP

Suggestion Title:

Change to rule 2.7

Current rule:

2.7 FearRP - If you are held at gunpoint and you weren't holding a gun first, you must follow demands given to you. You cannot equip a gun from your hot-bar or inventory at this time.

New rule:

2.7 FearRP - If you are held at gunpoint and you weren't holding a gun first, you must follow demands given to you, unless you can reasonably break gunpoint without excessively risking your life e.g by walking behind a wall within very close proximity. You cannot equip a gun from your hot-bar or inventory while under direct gunpoint.

How would it benefit the server:

Allows the rule to deviate situation-to-situation, creating some sort of leeway for those being gunpointed to escape or fight back. As it stands, being gunpointed is blatantly unfair due to the fact that you're not allowed to escape or fight back at all, even when presented with a good opening and doing such would be SAFER than complying with the demands.

This would add a larger sense of realism to situations and would make being gunpointed less AIDS, as you can't do anything about it atm.

Potential Issues/Exploits:

Makes the rule somewhat more difficult to understand and enforce.

Additional notes:

N/A.

Thank you for your time!

SorIe
Offline
Marvelous Boarder
Posts: 10846
Thanks received: 4309
Karma: 400

ex-dog LT member on many servers

Login or register to post a reply.

The following user(s) said Thank You: spodermon, Denis, perp

[SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7 7 years 1 day ago #907725

never got warned for fearrp because every admin forgets about it tbh	pigskin Offline User is blocked uwu Posts: 4807 Thanks received: 1440 Karma: -12
falling for the pink pill :OMEGALUL: Login or register to post a reply. The following user(s) said Thank You: SorIe

[SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7 7 years 1 day ago #907727

RhysB wrote: never got warned for fearrp because every admin forgets about it tbh but then when they don't, they can stretch the definition of "gunpoint" to shit and basically warn you for moving, it gets pretty aids	SorIe Offline Marvelous Boarder Posts: 10846 Thanks received: 4309 Karma: 400
ex-dog LT member on many servers Login or register to post a reply. The following user(s) said Thank You: pigskin

[SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7 7 years 1 day ago #907731

Yeah I agree this should be a thing, as you said though it would make things a little more complicated.	narexa Offline Divine Boarder Posts: 8287 Thanks received: 4844 Karma: 252
Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7 7 years 1 day ago #907737

	Nick0GR Offline Marvelous Boarder Posts: 10801 Thanks received: 3307 Karma: -113
GD+Server Apps Section staff TS3+Discord Staff Bhop Super admin TTT Super admin Discord: Nick0GR#9038 ex TTT Super admin Murder Super admin PropHunt Head admin Deathrun admin SSRP admin TeamSpeak staff Server apps + appeal section moderator Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7 7 years 1 day ago #907761

	Tony Lombardi Offline Junior Boarder Posts: 210 Thanks received: 224 Karma: 2
FP REBOOT BRING IT BACK LADS Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7 7 years 1 day ago #907778

	spodermon Offline Diamond Boarder heyyyy Posts: 4531 Thanks received: 1395 Karma: 18
bestest ex ssrp super admin e Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7 7 years 1 day ago #907781

	Denis Offline Diamond Boarder Posts: 2812 Thanks received: 1365 Karma: -49
Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7 7 years 23 hours ago #908376

bump	SorIe Offline Marvelous Boarder Posts: 10846 Thanks received: 4309 Karma: 400
ex-dog LT member on many servers Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7 6 years 10 months ago #938001

Bump	SorIe Offline Marvelous Boarder Posts: 10846 Thanks received: 4309 Karma: 400
ex-dog LT member on many servers Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7 6 years 1 month ago #1097833

hello please fix 2.7 admin	SorIe Offline Marvelous Boarder Posts: 10846 Thanks received: 4309 Karma: 400
ex-dog LT member on many servers Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7 6 years 1 month ago #1097877

I do this anyway, smd. I'll look to bring this up in the lead team meeting buddy.	Nafe Offline Former Community Manager Posts: 18752 Thanks received: 8655 Karma: -378
Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7 6 years 1 month ago #1097904

I have to admit, the current ruling on fear rp is not ideal. I would love to see your change being implemented!	Martin Offline Community Owner Square Pizza is the BEST! Posts: 2325 Thanks received: 1915 Karma: 796
Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7 6 years 1 month ago #1097920

As much as it makes sense to have the exception defined in the rule, I can see this being a problem to moderate considering it’s a fairly subjective area and you can never trust someone to fully use their common sense when handling these situations	.uzi Offline Former Community Manager Foos yer doos? Posts: 6010 Thanks received: 2444 Karma: 123
Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7 6 years 1 month ago #1097921

.uzi wrote:

As much as it makes sense to have the exception defined in the rule, I can see this being a problem to moderate considering it’s a fairly subjective area and you can never trust someone to fully use their common sense when handling these situations

:neutralsp:

then just have good staff 4Head

nah but seriously when I say good chance to break gunpoint I mean it has to be like 99% certain it's really hard to not properly enforce

SorIe
Offline
Marvelous Boarder
Posts: 10846
Thanks received: 4309
Karma: 400

ex-dog LT member on many servers

Login or register to post a reply.

[SSRP Suggestion] Change to rule 2.7 6 years 1 month ago #1097937

SorIe wrote:

.uzi wrote:

As much as it makes sense to have the exception defined in the rule, I can see this being a problem to moderate considering it’s a fairly subjective area and you can never trust someone to fully use their common sense when handling these situations

:neutralsp:

then just have good staff 4Head

nah but seriously when I say good chance to break gunpoint I mean it has to be like 99% certain it's really hard to not properly enforce

Yeah the likelyhood is it’ll be obvious but I’m just being picky about the fringe cases tbh, all in all it will probably be a good adjustment to the already existing rule