Login to ZARP

TOPIC: [TTT Suggestion] Removal from Rule 1.6

[TTT Suggestion] Removal from Rule 1.6 6 years 7 months ago #858271

Server Name:

TTT

Suggestion Title:

Edit to rule 1.6 Avoiding Punishment - removing the striked part of the rule.

If you are being addressed by a member, do not leave without their permission to do so. This also includes ban evasion, if you are banned you are not permitted to join the server until the ban expires. ~~If a player decides to leave with a pending "auto-slay" or "Slay Next Round" then they will be punished for doing so.~~

How would it benefit the server:

The auto slay already carries over to when you next join the server, so this generally isn't needed. Basically just cleans up the rule a bit and limits any potentially over the top punishments, due to a misleading rule.

Since the auto slay will stay until you get slain for it, this isn't needed.

Potential Issues/Exploits:

None.

Additional notes:

N/A

Thank you for your time!

SorIe
Offline
Marvelous Boarder
Posts: 10840
Thanks received: 4296
Karma: 400

ex-dog LT member on many servers

Login or register to post a reply.

[TTT Suggestion] Removal from Rule 1.6 6 years 7 months ago #858274

There could be some issues with this. Sometimes players get stuck on "Sending Client Info" but it still says you're on the server so you might be joining the server while the round is still going on which means it won't affect you idk if this made sense	Windows Offline Diamond Boarder Life isn’t a destination, it’s hell Posts: 3989 Thanks received: 963 Karma: -5
Login or register to post a reply.

[TTT Suggestion] Removal from Rule 1.6 6 years 7 months ago #858276

Windows wrote: There could be some issues with this. Sometimes players get stuck on "Sending Client Info" but it still says you're on the server so you might be joining the server while the round is still going on which means it won't affect you idk if this made sense There could be an exception made for this.	SorIe Offline Marvelous Boarder Posts: 10840 Thanks received: 4296 Karma: 400
ex-dog LT member on many servers Login or register to post a reply.

[TTT Suggestion] Removal from Rule 1.6 6 years 7 months ago #858278

Yes, windows it did make sense. And I think this should be clarified but what will happen is they will tell me no when I bring it up because "it doesn't need clarification".	Nick0GR Offline Marvelous Boarder Posts: 10798 Thanks received: 3307 Karma: -113
GD+Server Apps Section staff TS3+Discord Staff Bhop Super admin TTT Super admin Discord: Nick0GR#9038 ex TTT Super admin Murder Super admin PropHunt Head admin Deathrun admin SSRP admin TeamSpeak staff Server apps + appeal section moderator Login or register to post a reply.

[TTT Suggestion] Removal from Rule 1.6 6 years 7 months ago #858279

sorIe wrote:

Server Name:

TTT

Suggestion Title:

Edit to rule 1.6 Avoiding Punishment - removing the striked part of the rule.

If you are being addressed by a member, do not leave without their permission to do so. This also includes ban evasion, if you are banned you are not permitted to join the server until the ban expires. ~~If a player decides to leave with a pending "auto-slay" or "Slay Next Round" then they will be punished for doing so.~~

How would it benefit the server:

The auto slay already carries over to when you next join the server, so this generally isn't needed. Basically just cleans up the rule a bit and limits any potentially over the top punishments, due to a misleading rule.

Since the auto slay will stay until you get slain for it, this isn't needed.

Potential Issues/Exploits:

None.

Additional notes:

N/A

Thank you for your time!

This is already a thing, no one is punished for leaving with pending autoslays

BDnico17
Offline
Expert Boarder
That Spanish Guy
Posts: 1095
Thanks received: 309
Karma: 8

Login or register to post a reply.

[TTT Suggestion] Removal from Rule 1.6 6 years 7 months ago #858292

#SorleWillMakeTTTGreatAgain	Dewie Offline Expert Boarder Stop. Posts: 1243 Thanks received: 561 Karma: -4
Login or register to post a reply. The following user(s) said Thank You: SorIe, Raeker

[TTT Suggestion] Removal from Rule 1.6 6 years 7 months ago #858294

If they are given the aslay, they will be punished no matter what. No need to punish them for LTAP on top of that.	Jim_Jam Offline Former Community Manager TTT is my child ❤️ Posts: 8587 Thanks received: 3490 Karma: -32
Login or register to post a reply.

[TTT Suggestion] Removal from Rule 1.6 6 years 7 months ago #858307

While i don't agree with this it could be argued that if a player leaves right after they receive a pending autoslay then their intent was to leave before they carry out the punishment, thus trying to avoid it. So it could still be seen as LTAP as they are leaving to try and avoid their punishment. Not saying i would add another slay to someone for this or that you should, just that it could be seen in this way.

Miia
Offline
Expert Boarder
Ex-TTT Super Admin
Posts: 1302
Thanks received: 810
Karma: 3

My Steam

Login or register to post a reply.

[TTT Suggestion] Removal from Rule 1.6 6 years 7 months ago #858329

Jim_Jam wrote: If they are given the aslay, they will be punished no matter what. No need to punish them for LTAP on top of that. Yeah take notes	A Good Pianist Offline Spectacular Boarder A Wob A Bob Bob Posts: 15000 Thanks received: 3911 Karma: 22
Login or register to post a reply.