TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] Raeker's Application

RP Name:
Raeker

Time Zone:
CEST

Link to Steam Profile:
My Steam

SteamID:
STEAM_0:0:58124960

Current Gametracker Profiles:
Server 1
Server 2
Server 3
Note: The way I play SSRP is by walking around, talking to people and reporting rulebreaks to staff. I do not raid or base, meaning that I do not get any score whilst playing. This means that my Gametrackers don't update. Therefore I do have more activity then it states in those gametrackers.

Estimated Server Time:
Around 20-30~ish hours, but it didn't save on my Gametrackers so I can't be sure.

Languages I speak:
Dutch and English

Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario:
"Random Death Match," or RDM, is killing another player without a proper reason.
Example:
- Player A kills Player B when Player B was AFK mining

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario:
"New Life Rule," or NLR, applies when a user died in a district. You cannot join that district for another 3 minutes.
Example:
Player A got killed in the Residential District during a raid by Player B and then immediately - so before the three minute limit is over - returns to the Residential District.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.

Player X just made an F1 explaining that Player Y randomly killed him in the Suburbs District. I would quickly check the logs and discover that what Player X said is true - Player Y did indeed kill him, seemingly randomly. I'd take both players to a secluded area and calm them both down (I'm assuming that at the very least one of them is upset about this). I'd ask if one of them could describe the situation to me and I'd also ask for Player Y's side of the story. In the end, I'd come up with a verdict that's appropriate to the situation, most probably with giving Player Y a warning - though if the player does provide proof (for example, Player X asked them to kill them and they have pictures/a video of this happening) then I could come to a different conclusion.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.

Player X made an F1 where he describes how Player Y raided his base, then after Player X killed Player Y, the other player returned and killed Player X instead. Like in the earlier situation, after quickly checking the logs I'd take both of them to a secluded area where we won't be disturbed. There I would once again calm them down, if needed, and discuss the situation with both of them. Of course, I'll be partially biased as Player X's fun gametime got disturbed by a player that almost definitely broke NLR (the deaths were too close together). But to make it clear that I try to give a neutral opinion, I'll still spend time with the willing players to discuss what happened and come to a fitting conclusion - most probably warning Player Y, though this can change depending on how the conversation goes down.

Why I should be chosen:
Well, I'm applying again. What should I say? Most people will know me at this point - I'm a Teamspeak Head Administrator, a TTT Head Administrator, formerly a Prophunt Super Administrator, a former Deathrun Moderator and also formerly a SSRP Moderator. Besides this, I also manage two forum sections.

So I think it's pretty safe to say that I'm trusted with powers. I'm familiar with the SSRP rules, often reporting users for rulebreaks. As of recent I'm actively playing the game, I even played for three hours straight on the day that I'm writing this.

There are a couple of issues with accepting me, however:
- Although I am a former Moderator, I have only done 5 F1's at the time. You can't really say that I had ever made an actual impact or was a real benefit to the server.

- Although my gametrackers don't even show close to what my actual time is, I'll be entirely honest and tell you that I do not have two weeks of consistent activity. I started playing SSRP again a few weeks ago, but I've only started to play actively as of this week.

These are definitely facts that the SSRP staff team should take into account when discussing my application. However, I also believe they should take this into account:

- I have never been punished anywhere on ZARP, not just on SSRP

- I constantly make F1's whilst on the server. Several mods and admins can confirm this fact.

So although there are definite negatives, I do believe the positives outweigh them in this case. Don't forget that SSRP is very understaffed currently, with users having to wait a long time before having their F1's handled. Denying me would mean that I could not handle those F1's even though I'm definitely capable of it, whilst accepting me would mean that I would get to prove myself as a good SSRP staff member that will do his job fairly and actively.

Extra Info:
I just like to add this section lol. School is properly starting next week, but I should be able to get my activity still.

Thank you for reading!
Love you <3

Thanks for applying for staff at ZARP DarkRp! During our weekly staff meeting your application, question answers, game trackers and in-game warnings are checked and then the staff team votes on your application.

This time, the staff team have decided that you still need to work on your application and then apply again next week. To try and help you they have summarised some positives & negatives discussed during the meeting:

You can apply again at any time, and thanks for supporting ZARP!