Login to ZARP
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: [TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630036

Thanks for the positive feedback everyone! There is of course the argument to be made that we have enough HA's, however I thought that a few weeks ago as well and someone else got the rank.

So I might as well apply anyway - besides, what harm is there in accepting me? It's not like there's a maximum number of HA's on a server, and I'd do more good than harm.
  • Raeker
  • Raeker's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Former Community Manager
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • It hurts the best of us
  • Posts: 9175
  • Thanks received: 6577
  • Karma: 213
The topic has been locked.

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630040

Raeker wrote:
Thanks for the positive feedback everyone! There is of course the argument to be made that we have enough HA's, however I thought that a few weeks ago as well and someone else got the rank.

So I might as well apply anyway - besides, what harm is there in accepting me? It's not like there's a maximum number of HA's on a server, and I'd do more good than harm.

True.

:plussp:
  • _DeletedAcc_
  • _DeletedAcc_'s Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Boarder
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • Ex-Player (Aj107)
  • Posts: 389
  • Thanks received: 52
  • Karma: -1
-
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630046

100% :support:
  • bobrossrip
  • bobrossrip's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Junior Boarder
  • I am a proud happy accident
  • Posts: 109
  • Thanks received: 17
  • Karma: 0
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630070

Raeker wrote:
Thanks for the positive feedback everyone! There is of course the argument to be made that we have enough HA's, however I thought that a few weeks ago as well and someone else got the rank.

So I might as well apply anyway - besides, what harm is there in accepting me? It's not like there's a maximum number of HA's on a server, and I'd do more good than harm.

Johnler resigned so a dedicated and hard working super admin had to take his position.
  • RFlex
  • RFlex's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Legendary Member
  • ZARP VIP
  • whats up
  • Posts: 5684
  • Thanks received: 996
  • Karma: -60
The topic has been locked.

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630102

I was going to support but I saw this.
Raeker wrote:
Love you <3
I will say this though, I have not personally seen what Raeker does but I have seen his work elsewhere(Forums, TS) and I know that he is very hard working and would do great work with this rank and help out with the server keeping it at that #1 spot.
  • Sally
  • Sally's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Forum Administrator
  • ZARP VIP
  • Can You Understand How Strange It Is To Be Alive?
  • Posts: 7007
  • Thanks received: 3531
  • Karma: 62


Brother Gustro: sally is a minge
Last Edit: 7 years 4 months ago by Sally.
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630107

AA RFLeX wrote:
Raeker wrote:
Thanks for the positive feedback everyone! There is of course the argument to be made that we have enough HA's, however I thought that a few weeks ago as well and someone else got the rank.

So I might as well apply anyway - besides, what harm is there in accepting me? It's not like there's a maximum number of HA's on a server, and I'd do more good than harm.

Johnler resigned so a dedicated and hard working super admin had to take his position.
despite already having FOUR?
  • cJazz
  • cJazz's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Boarder
  • fanatic egalitarian
  • Posts: 315
  • Thanks received: 148
  • Karma: 6
The topic has been locked.

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630108

Why were my posts removed? They merely stated the truth and did not break TOU.

Either way :plussp:
  • SorIe
  • SorIe's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Marvelous Boarder
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • Posts: 10840
  • Thanks received: 4296
  • Karma: 400

ex-dog LT member on many servers

The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630111

Sorle wrote:
Why were my posts removed? They merely stated the truth and did not break TOU.
They may not have broke TOU but were not relevant to Raeker's application as you were quoting posts which were breaking TOU by stirring drama.
  • Sally
  • Sally's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Forum Administrator
  • ZARP VIP
  • Can You Understand How Strange It Is To Be Alive?
  • Posts: 7007
  • Thanks received: 3531
  • Karma: 62


Brother Gustro: sally is a minge
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: SorIe, Raeker

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630115

let me put it a different way - I think there could be less head admins whilst still having raeker being one of them because I think he deserves it more than some current ones
  • cJazz
  • cJazz's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Boarder
  • fanatic egalitarian
  • Posts: 315
  • Thanks received: 148
  • Karma: 6
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630223

Sorry for causing so much drama with my comment, it was not my intention. I'll quickly respond to R-Flex's comment that survived this mess later
  • Raeker
  • Raeker's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Former Community Manager
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • It hurts the best of us
  • Posts: 9175
  • Thanks received: 6577
  • Karma: 213
The topic has been locked.

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630613

AA RFLeX wrote:
Raeker wrote:
Thanks for the positive feedback everyone! There is of course the argument to be made that we have enough HA's, however I thought that a few weeks ago as well and someone else got the rank.

So I might as well apply anyway - besides, what harm is there in accepting me? It's not like there's a maximum number of HA's on a server, and I'd do more good than harm.

Johnler resigned so a dedicated and hard working super admin had to take his position.
AA RFLeX wrote:
We still dont really need any HAs. Just because Jonhler resigned that doesnt mean that we need a new HA. We still have a bigger LT than SSRP :)

Good Luck
That's quite a big change of heart, no? Either way, that wasn't the point I wanted to bring up. What I wanted to bring up is that you seemingly misunderstood my comment.

My comment wasn't to critisize the latest Head Admin, but to explain why I'm applying currently and will keep doing so until I get the rank. I originally believed there to be enough so I didn't apply as I didn't see any reason. However, someone else got promoted. I'm not saying I deserve it more than them or that they don't deserve it at all, but you need to understand how horrible it feels to purposely not apply only for someone else to get promoted.

As the number of HA's simply isn't, and can't be, a problem, I will keep applying. Simple as that.
  • Raeker
  • Raeker's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Former Community Manager
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • It hurts the best of us
  • Posts: 9175
  • Thanks received: 6577
  • Karma: 213
The topic has been locked.

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630694

Raeker wrote:
AA RFLeX wrote:
Raeker wrote:
Thanks for the positive feedback everyone! There is of course the argument to be made that we have enough HA's, however I thought that a few weeks ago as well and someone else got the rank.

So I might as well apply anyway - besides, what harm is there in accepting me? It's not like there's a maximum number of HA's on a server, and I'd do more good than harm.

Johnler resigned so a dedicated and hard working super admin had to take his position.
AA RFLeX wrote:
We still dont really need any HAs. Just because Jonhler resigned that doesnt mean that we need a new HA. We still have a bigger LT than SSRP :)

Good Luck
That's quite a big change of heart, no? Either way, that wasn't the point I wanted to bring up. What I wanted to bring up is that you seemingly misunderstood my comment.

My comment wasn't to critisize the latest Head Admin, but to explain why I'm applying currently and will keep doing so until I get the rank. I originally believed there to be enough so I didn't apply as I didn't see any reason. However, someone else got promoted. I'm not saying I deserve it more than them or that they don't deserve it at all, but you need to understand how horrible it feels to purposely not apply only for someone else to get promoted.

As the number of HA's simply isn't, and can't be, a problem, I will keep applying. Simple as that.

And my opinion still hasnt changed about it. I wasnt in the meeting when Xnator was promoted to Head Admin hence why i couldnt bring it up.
  • RFlex
  • RFlex's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Legendary Member
  • ZARP VIP
  • whats up
  • Posts: 5684
  • Thanks received: 996
  • Karma: -60
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630700

AA RFLeX wrote:
Raeker wrote:
AA RFLeX wrote:
Raeker wrote:
Thanks for the positive feedback everyone! There is of course the argument to be made that we have enough HA's, however I thought that a few weeks ago as well and someone else got the rank.

So I might as well apply anyway - besides, what harm is there in accepting me? It's not like there's a maximum number of HA's on a server, and I'd do more good than harm.

Johnler resigned so a dedicated and hard working super admin had to take his position.
AA RFLeX wrote:
We still dont really need any HAs. Just because Jonhler resigned that doesnt mean that we need a new HA. We still have a bigger LT than SSRP :)

Good Luck
That's quite a big change of heart, no? Either way, that wasn't the point I wanted to bring up. What I wanted to bring up is that you seemingly misunderstood my comment.

My comment wasn't to critisize the latest Head Admin, but to explain why I'm applying currently and will keep doing so until I get the rank. I originally believed there to be enough so I didn't apply as I didn't see any reason. However, someone else got promoted. I'm not saying I deserve it more than them or that they don't deserve it at all, but you need to understand how horrible it feels to purposely not apply only for someone else to get promoted.

As the number of HA's simply isn't, and can't be, a problem, I will keep applying. Simple as that.

And my opinion still hasnt changed about it. I wasnt in the meeting when Xnator was promoted to Head Admin hence why i couldnt bring it up.
Fair enough. Thank you for your feedback :)
  • Raeker
  • Raeker's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Former Community Manager
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • It hurts the best of us
  • Posts: 9175
  • Thanks received: 6577
  • Karma: 213
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: RFlex

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630712

What is the point in having less staff help? There shouldn’t be a rejection because there is “too many HA s”. If the candidate is good enough (which he is) then he should be accepted.

But hey, thats just a theory..
A ZARP THEORY!
  • bobrossrip
  • bobrossrip's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Junior Boarder
  • I am a proud happy accident
  • Posts: 109
  • Thanks received: 17
  • Karma: 0
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Jim_Jam, Raeker

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630728

:support:

Raeker!
  • Wonky
  • Wonky's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Boarder
  • ZARP VIP
  • unbothered
  • Posts: 1944
  • Thanks received: 574
  • Karma: 100
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630876

:plussp:

<3
  • FinnFinnary
  • FinnFinnary's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Boarder
  • 3
  • Posts: 12
  • Thanks received: 5
  • Karma: 1
❤❤❤❤❤
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630879

IS A LAD

:PLUSSP:
  • Roy Harper
  • Roy Harper's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Adept Boarder
  • ZARP VIP
  • someone stole my legendary member
  • Posts: 6857
  • Thanks received: 1950
  • Karma: 15


»Ex-DarkRP HeadAdmin«
»Ex-TeamSpeak3 Staff«
»Ex-Appeals Section Mod«
»Ex-Jailbreak Moderator«
»Ex-Bhop Moderator«
Last Edit: 7 years 4 months ago by Roy Harper.
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #630883

A really good candidate for head admin. Good luck Raeker.
  • Annie Moonise
  • Annie Moonise's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Legendary Member
  • ZARP VIP
  • Ex Deathrun Server Owner
  • Posts: 2691
  • Thanks received: 881
  • Karma: 20
Ex Deathrun Server Owner
Ex TeamSpeak Staff
Ex Forum Staff - Deathrun Moderator Section
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #631025

bobrossrip wrote:
What is the point in having less staff help? There shouldn’t be a rejection because there is “too many HA s”. If the candidate is good enough (which he is) then he should be accepted.

But hey, thats just a theory..
A ZARP THEORY!
that's like saying there should be 20 presidents because there are a lot of good options - point is, when they're not good enough they're kicked out and replaced as opposed to being good at one point and degrading yet still staying in office
  • cJazz
  • cJazz's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Boarder
  • fanatic egalitarian
  • Posts: 315
  • Thanks received: 148
  • Karma: 6
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker

[TTT Head Administrator] Raeker's Application 7 years 4 months ago #631040

Raeker's a very reasonable and clear candidate for this role. Takes initiative, shows compassion, and likes to be very reasonable when approaching situations while avoiding unnecessary conflict. I don't play on TTT, but I've seen these traits in him throughout my time on the forums and speaking to him personally, and I just think he's doing a great job at being a good person.

:plussp:
  • Father Watson
  • Father Watson's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Nitro Booster
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • Posts: 1264
  • Thanks received: 1042
  • Karma: 115
https://gyazo.com/fbafb32cd9b0fe8b55a862c42ff71d9a
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Raeker
Time to create page: 0.153 seconds

122 PLAYERS ONLINE

Connect to server View Gametracker DarkRP 1
4/127
online
Connect to server View Gametracker Deathrun
0/40
online
Connect to server View Gametracker TTT
0/47
online
Connect to server View Gametracker Bhop
1/32
online
Connect to server View Gametracker Surf
0/0
offline
Connect to server View Gametracker Prop Hunt
0/42
online
Connect to server View Gametracker Sandbox
0/42
online
Connect to server Discord
117/913
online
Top