bobrossrip wrote:
What is the point in having less staff help? There shouldn’t be a rejection because there is “too many HA s”. If the candidate is good enough (which he is) then he should be accepted.
But hey, thats just a theory..
A ZARP THEORY!
that's like saying there should be 20 presidents because there are a lot of good options - point is, when they're not good enough they're kicked out and replaced as opposed to being good at one point and degrading yet still staying in office