TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] Gamersfunhouse's Application

Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario:
Random Death Match, also known as RDM is when a player will kill another player for an invalid or no RP reason at all.

For example if Player X was to kill Player Y for the reason "I don't like his taste of peanut butter", this would be considered Random Death Match.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario:
New Life Rule, also known as NLR is when a player would return or interact with the district in which they died in for 3 minutes, If you are to die in spawn you much leave the area as soon as possible.

For example if Player X was to be killed by Player Y in the warehouse district and Player X was to return to that area within 3 minutes, he would then be breaking New Life Rule and must leave the area as quickly as he can or he will be punished.

Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario:
Metagaming is when a player would use Out of Character (OOC) channels to give out information to other players he would otherwise not be able to receive this information.

Say for example Player X is being raided by Player Y and he calls out in the OOC "I am being raided at the fountain district, come and help me" he would then be breaking the Metagaming rule.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.

First of all I would take both of the players to a nice quiet roof and I would freeze the player who was accused of it, as if he is RDMing like he was accused of I do not want to be shot and killed whilst doing the sit. I would then check through the logs to confirm Player X was in fact killed by Player Y and would proceed to ask Player Y why he did it and then I would ask for proof from Player X in the form of video or screenshot (if possible). This could now go down one of two ways.

If Player X has proof to back up his accusations I would then proceed to look at the proof and if it is valid I would then punish Player Y in a way I think he deserves. I would then Player Y back and apologise to Player X for the inconvenience Player Y may have caused and then send him back.

If Player X does not have proof to back up his accusations then I would have to let him know there is no way I can proceed with the sit and send both of the players down after apologising to Player X about there being nothing I can do. I would then keep a close eye on Player Y to see if I can maybe catch him RDMing again.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.

I would check the logs and see if Player X's accusations are correct and check the logs for the district and time he died, if the deaths are within 3 minutes I would then proceed to punish Player Y accordingly after asking him why he did it.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided

I would simply PM the user asking him not to Metagame, however if he continues to do so I would TP to him and ask him to stop. If he is to do it a 3rd time I would then warn the user for Metagaming and let him continue with his day.

Why I should be chosen (we recommend around 150 words):

I believe I should be chosen because I am a very active user on the ZARP SSRP servers. I would mainly focus on server 1 and 3 and would like to help keep those server clean however I can jump on server 2 if I am ever needed on there. I do have recent warnings but I can promise the staff team that those will be my last warnings I will ever receive. I have been staff in the past which proves I can handle the position, I have resigned but those are due to getting bored or not being able to be in the position of staff anymore due to work or something else. I have been on the server for a very long time now and I have a very strong knowledge of the rules, you may argue I don't due to my warnings but that was because I was stupid and chose not to follow rules I knew, I guess I mainly did this to show off to people but I can assure you those days are gone. I am currently working on getting my game time up on server 1 and 3 so my activity on server 2 may not be the best.

I would like to take this opportunity to prove to the community I have changed since I got community banned. I am really missing being a staff member and for those who didn't know I have been moderator 3 times in the past, I have also been staff on other ZARP servers but they don't exist anymore. I was a helper on the Minecraft server back in 2015 and I was a jailbreak Admin back in 2014 - 2015. Please don't let my recent warnings fool you, I have genuinely changed and would like to prove it to all of you. Once again, sorry for the things I did in the past but I am telling you now, they will stay in the past.

Thanks for taking the time to read my application I hope you choose to support me whilst I run for it.

Great guy

I would like to mention I have 2 active warnings that will be gone on the day of the meeting, it's a shame that it all depends on the time they make the spreadsheet.

This guy is literally improving, you can have a good chat with him on steam in game or anywhere, and when playing this guy, you cant not have fun. Your maturity has improved and so has your attitude.

from me.

Community banned?

yeses

Active
Great Guy

Great guy

nutty nathan is a sick guy who knows the rules and is a lovely guy!

Considering at one point you had 36 recent punishments, you are also a minge, you have not changed lmao.

lMichaell wrote: I beg to differ but you're entitled to your opinion...

Can be dick but great guy ^_^(don't be like faze)

I don't play ssrp but Nice activity and app

Is a good guy and knows the rules

snake9007 wrote: I can assure you apart from this weekend I am no longer a dick, the only reason I was seeming to be a dick was because I was tired from basing all weekend and things seemed to annoy me really easily.

Thanks for the support nevertheless!

lMichaell wrote:
I think you should give him a chance Michael, i've seen some positive changes.
Remember when i told you that i believed that people is able to improve, and then you did? same situation

PerzioN wrote: Thanks for pointing this our PerizoN!

I have seen a change in you and if you say your warnings will be gone by the meeting all should be good and you may have my support , best of luck!

Onion wrote: Thanks very much onions, yes the warnings will be longer active on the Saturday of the meeting <3!

Raided him 3 times one day with DUCKY because we were bored and him and a couple others that were with him were the only ones basing and he surprisingly didn't get mad like most people would, he actually let us come in later and hang out.