TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] Bobby Bobbys' Application

Just before you read the application, I just wanted to tell people, that I have made an improvement from when I was last banned. Please understand that my recent warnings were from when I was a rule breaker, but now I am a changed person and I have not broken a rule for nearly 2 weeks. I am very sorry for anyone I have ennoyed or done anything to that was wrong and I will make it up to them if needed.

RP Name: |NS Officer| Bobby Bobbys
Link to Steam Profile: steamcommunity.com/id/-Bobby-/
SteamID: STEAM_0:0:58115957
Current Gametracker Profiles:
Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/player/Bobby%20Bobby...arpgaming.com:27015/
Server 2 - Unfortunently due to lack of time on s2 (I've played on it before) It does not show up under my name. I will fix this as soon as possible.

Age: 12

Estimated Server Time: 166 hours (alot more hours on other names)

Languages I speak: English Only.

DarkRP Related
Green = Scenario Blue = Idea of what it is going to be about Black = Question
Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario.
Player Z kills player Y with no valid Roleplay reason to kill him.
Example: 'Player Z is walking down the side walk and sees player Y and decides to kill him'

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario.
Player Z kills player Y for a valid Roleplay reason, than player Y comes back to the suburbs which or that he died in.
Example: Player Z kills player Y for not dropping his money in a mug, and then player Y comes back to the suburbs he died in.

Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario.
When someone types something that should be in advert in ooc, it is concidered Metagaming.
Example: Player Z is trying to advertise that he is selling his Thundergun, Player Z types "/ooc Selling Thundergun!"

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.
I would ask player x if he has any proof of the rdming situation, and ask player y why he killed player x. If player y admits to it and or player x has proof of player y rdming him, player y will get a warning. If player y said he had a valid reason and or player x has no proof, I would dismiss the admin sit and handle the next f1 or go back to what I was doing.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.
I would ask player y why he had broken nlr and ask player x why he killed player y. If player y has got any recent warns for nlr (before this nlr) I would warn him, if he had not got any recent warns for nlr and/or understands nlr, I will give him a verbal warning and dismiss the admin sit. If player x killed player y for a non valid Roleplay reason, I would warn him and repeat what I did in the sentence before this, if player x did have a valid reason to kill him, I would let him off and repeat the last sentence. If neither of these rules were broken, I would dismiss the admin sit.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided
I would bring player x to an admin sit and tell him that he has broken the rule 'Metagame' and explain how Metagaming works, if he knew it was against the rules or has any suspicion of doing it before, I will warn him, if he has not had experience with Metagaming, I would verbaly warn him, than I would dismiss the admin sit and teleport him back to his origional spot and go back to whatever I was doing.

Why I should be chosen (we recommend around 150 words).


Any Plus Supports will be greatly appreciated, and Minus Supports I will improve on.

Add some colors, you said on my apply i didn't play but i play at Server 2 so

Tinky Winky wrote: I will add some colours, I am sorry for my minussp I just had not seen you on s1 before, the main server I play on, I will catch up with you when we see eachother ingame.

Bump?

Tinky Winky wrote: Not a valid reason to unsupport but ok

Fredd wrote: Thanks Fredd xD

I need you guys to give me feedback Bump!

From what i saw of you, you were not even close to having a good enough attitude to be a moderator. Until i see for myself you've changed, it will stay as;

itzsonzy wrote: I understand, I hope to see you soon.

Bump?

Immature af. He orbed as a Citizen before to test his ammo boost. He breaks rules all the time

Ashur wrote: Orb is a small weapon (binoculars) and I was not raiding, I was just testing xD did no harm...

Bobby Bobbys wrote: This shows you dont know the rules.
An orbital strike counts as a really heavy weapon. As a citizen you are only allowed Pistols and Melee weapons (Knives and Machete and Damascus) And orbital strike does heavy damage.

You were recently banned for something. I believe you can change from this and hope to see a dramatic change in your attitude towards staff and rules. so right now

Thanks for applying for staff at ZARP DarkRp! During our weekly staff meeting your application, question answers, game trackers and in-game warnings are checked and then the staff team votes on your application.

This time, the staff team have decided that you still need to work on your application and then apply again next week. To try and help you they have summarised some positives & negatives discussed during the meeting:

You can apply again at any time, and thanks for supporting ZARP!