Login to ZARP
|
RP Name Terry
Link to Steam Profile steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198096469141/ SteamID STEAM_0:1:68101706 Current Gametracker Profiles Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/server_info/151.80.2...9:27015/top_players/ www.gametracker.com/player/DawsonProduct...arpgaming.com:27015/ Server 2 - www.gametracker.com/server_info/151.80.2...9:27025/top_players/ Age 21 Estimated Server Time 60 Hours Languages I speak English, a bit of German Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario. Random Death Match is where someone randomly goes up to someone, and kills them. e.g. Player x walks up to player y. Player x is a gun man. Player y is a citizen afk in spawn. Player y has done nothing wrong to anyone including player x. Player x shoots player y and kills him with an ak47. Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario. New Life Rule is where someone gets killed and they cannot go back to the district (place between the tunnels) for 3 minutes. They must also forget anything that happened, who killed them etc. and cannot see the person they got killed by and go you raided me and then kill them. e.g. Player x gets killed in a raid by Player y. Player x was killed in the main district. Player x cannot go back to his base or the main district for 3 minutes and cannot carry on any rp "beef" between himself and player y. Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario. Metagaming is where somone gains infomation from an out of rp chat or thing e.g. in ooc then they use this infomation to attain their goal. e.g. Player x is a hitman. Someone says in ooc that Player y is at the fountain. Player y has a hit on him. Player x goes to the fountain without any other infomation that player y is there other than the ooc message and player x kills player y. Player z who was the one that said that Player y was at the fountain has also metagamed. Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x. Bring both players to a rooftop. Paste the kill log into chat and ask Player y why he killed Player x. If Player y says he was raiding Player x or something that would clear Player y of rdm then ask Player x if he has any evidence of the rdming. If Player x provides sufficent eveidence (e.g. a video showing the whole ordeal, showing that Player y had come up to Player x and shot him) and that Player x had no hit on him or the chat logs dont provide anything that shows it wasnt rdm then warn Player Y for rdm. If Player Y admits to rdm then warn him. Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time. If they are close together at a busy time then they must have been under three minutes inbetween them. Just being close, however, is not enough evidence to say that he definetly was breaking nlr so you cannot warn him right away just from the logs. If Player x can provide sufficient evidence that Player y did break nlr (e.g. a one minute video where player x mugs and kills player y then player y comes straight back in the same one minute video (nlr is three minutes) and kills Player x then Player y has not forgotten his past life and could have also possibly stepped into the same district within the three minutes and so therefore has comitted an offense and so I would warn him. If enough eveidence is not given and it hasnt been proved then I would have to let Player y go. Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided I would bring Player x to a rooftop. I would ask him who was raiding him and if it is someone with a police job (police swat etc) I would ask for evidence that he was raiding and if it is sufficent then i would bring the raider to the rooftop and warn him for raiding a bank which police arnt allowed to do and tell him that if i caught him doing it again i would warn him, possibly ban him temporarily or kick him and i would demote him from his police job. If it is a robber who was raiding him i would ask if he had a building sign, if he did and it was put up before the raid (i would check the logs for him using the textscreen tool) then I would warn the raider. If he doesnt have a building sign then I would tell Player x that the raider is allowed to raid him as his job allows it. I would not warn Player x for metagaming as he believed someone had broken the rules and was calling an admin. I WOULD ONLY DO THIS IF THERE WERE NO F1s CURRENTLY NEEDED TO BE DEALT WITH AND I WOULD TELL HIM TO MAKE AN F1 NEXT TIME. Why I should be chosen (we recommend around 150 words). I really like the Zarp server and I believe i would be a good moderator. It is a really fun thing to do and I would be on at weekends and whenever I can and I would do the f1s. I want to do F1s as I believe that if they need doing they should be done and I can help with that and I also think that it is a fun thing to do if I have just rped for an hour and was not getting anywhere and I want a break from the rping and so I would just do a load of F1s. If there were a lot of F1s I would do them before I RP. I believe that I know the rules quite well and I read them quite a lot if someone has told me about a rule I didnt know, to make sure I was up to date on all the rules. Ultimately, I think it is a fun thing to do to be moderator and I would just like a chance to prove that I would be a good one. Thanks |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
I have not seen you in game, so i dont really know what to say about you. I think that you should attempt to make your application look a little better, otherwise it looks a little rushed.
|
|
Ex-Deathrun Moderator Ex-SSRP Administrator Ex-TTT Moderator Ex-Minigames Moderator "Perp advertiser"
The topic has been locked.
|
No activity
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
Thanks for applying for staff at ZARP DarkRp! During our weekly staff meeting your application, question answers, game trackers and in-game warnings are checked and then the staff team votes on your application.
This time, the staff team have decided that you still need to work on your application and then apply again next week. To try and help you they have summarised some positives & negatives discussed during the meeting: Low activity, play a lot more throughout the weeks and apply again. You can apply again at any time, and thanks for supporting ZARP! . |
|
The topic has been locked.
|