Zer0nix wrote:
Nerdlord wrote:
Jugger wrote:
Zer0nix wrote:
Let me tell you my experience with the user "Nerdlord"
I was wanted, I hid in a house ( Keep in mind the house didn't have any props or any doors owned ) and waited. A police officer comes and tazes me while I was indeed still wanted. Then nerdlord comes, he kills the police officer which is rdm. Then he looks at me for let's say 10 seconds. I then tell him that, what he did was rdm and then he proceeds to kill me saying that he counter raided me. That makes no sense whatsoever since the house didn't have any props in it or any doors owned.
I then did an f1 in which he admitted everything I've said, but it ended in the classic " Misunderstanding " which honestly I am salty about because I feel that he deserved a warn for rdming two people.
-Support
. Ok u don't get it if a police teasers you a guy is allowed to kill him no matter what it's not rdm but the bit about counter raid is
Thing is, he has no proof of this occurring in the first place.
Oh so by saying I have no proof you think you're going to escape this? Sure I have no proof, but we both know it happened or you think that if I have no proof people will say that I'm the one making this up and trying to put you in a bad light? Either way, a moderator should not lie about something like that. But wait, if you deny what happened then why did you say this in your last posts?<code> " This was a misunderstanding. I meant no harm whatsoever and I am incredibly sorry for any distress I caused. "</code> Thanks, without that post people would actually think that I was the one lying.
As for the application itself what was in your head when you started the "Why me " section with " I know I'm a minge" You think that's funny ? Or shall we say you take this a joke?
Ah, presumptions, presumptions. "you take this as a joke" No. When I say that I'm a minge, it's because I acknowledge that I'm annoying at times and do the wrong thing, but that I'm trying to improve. You probably didn't read it all, anyway.
And the "no proof" thing is true. I was just stating this, as it meant that it could not be taken any further than a verbal warn by a higher-ranking staff member. That was all I intended when I said that. I wasn't denying that it happened. If I did cause any distress to you with the misunderstanding, I actually mean it when I say I'm sorry and I will not allow this to happen again.