TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] Zenternal's Application.

RP Name: At the moment it is [VIP] Zenternal, but I'm changing it back to Zenternal soon.
Link to Steam Profile:steamcommunity.com/id/OlliePottFTW/
SteamID:STEAM_0:0:99656932
Current Gametracker Profiles
Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/player/Zenternal/play.zarpgaming.com:27015/
Server 2 - www.gametracker.com/player/Zenternal/play.zarpgaming.com:27025/

Age: 12, turning 13 next year.

Estimated Server Time: 1300 minutes.

Languages I speak: Full English, a little French.



Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario: When someone starts to fight another player for no reason. For example, someone is spawning in and a guy kills the person spawning in.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario: New Life Rule is basically when you die, you forget everything like who killed you and where you died. If you get revenge on the murderer or return to your death place, you will be punished.

Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario: Where you're being out of character whilst roleplaying. Knowing something that you weren't suppose to.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.: Warn player y for RDM and jail for 120 seconds. Return player x to original position.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time: I will first ask player x what happened. Then, I will hear player y's story. I will evaluate the reasons and if he did break NLR, I will warn him / her.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided: I will first tell him / her= they are metagaming, then I will tell him / her to use F1. After that, I will tell them that they shouldn't report someone for raiding.

Why I should be chosen (we recommend around 150 words): First of all, I don't want this bit to be too long. Second, I should become a moderator because I have noticed that the staff take like 15 minutes to get to each f1, They don't really listen to the other victim's pov (No offense guys c:). I can't say much because I have broke a couple of rules sometimes. But everyone should have a second chance, right? Anyway, I hope you put this into notice and think well about this.

Yours,
Zenternal

application looks a bit rushed, almost no activity at all
im going with - Support

Hey there, i am going to review your application.



+cant realy see any



- app is rushed
- bad activity

After summing things up i have decided to go with

GOOD LUCK!

Poor activity, rushed application.

Hello there buddy! My name is Chinese Eliminator. This post is for you to read and for others to base their opinions on about you on this very application.

My opinion
Zenternal, you seem to have good spirits into joining the staff team, I have read your application and I see many mistakes in it. Although that your answers may be correct, it seems to be a bit vague. I have never seen you however, meaning that your activity is quite low. It's advisable to be active, so we know how dedicated you are to the staff team.

Positives
Application answers are correct
Your final answer seems to be in good shape, with evidence of some determination, although it's a bit boring.

Negatives
Your estimated server time is 1300 minutes. That's 21.67 hours...
Your answers are too vague and don't give enough detail for the reader to follow
Your activity over the week is extremely low
You seem to have a picture of what it seems to be me, is Hitler on your steam profile with no eyes. I may be wrong, but this shows a slight sign of immaturity.
Overall Verdict
My opinion about you is...


NEGATIVE!

low activity, rushed app

-support
~ xSeppe

First and foremost, we'd like to thank you for making the effort to apply for a rank on the ZARP Semi Serious DarkRP. Your application has been discussed at an administrative meeting, and from there it has been voted on.


Unfortunately as more staff members voted 'no' than 'yes', the application has been denied.

The meeting host has taken some criticisms made by the admins and provided you with this feedback:

You are welcome to apply again at any point.