TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] James Stone's Mod Application

RP Name:
[SS] James Stone

Link to Steam Profile:
steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198045725569

SteamID:
STEAM_0:1:42729920


[b]Current Gametracker Profiles:[/b]
Server 1 -http://www7.gametracker.com/player/Genkku%20%5BJames%20Stone%5D/play.zarpgaming.com:27015/
Server 2 - <-- sorry i don't like server 2 + i didnt find my gametracker on server 2


Age:
16

Estimated Server Time:
162 Hours?

Languages I speak:
English, Finnish

Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario:
Definition:
Random Death Match or mostly called as "RDM" is when player 1 kills player 2 for no reason.
Example:
James is walking to the banker and John kills him because James was walking too fast.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario.
Definition:
New Life Rule or Mostly Said As "NLR" is when you can't back to the same district for 3 minutes + You don't remember anything what happened from last life.
Example:
James is raiding John and John dies for James, then John comes back immideatly to kill James because doesn't wanna his stuff stolen.
Explain "Meta gaming" and give an example scenario.
Definition:
Meta gaming is that you type Roleplay information in OOC Chat, Out Of Chacater Chat
Example: James is screaming help in OOC Chat because he is being raided by John. "(OOC) James : FAST STOOKI COME DEFEND MY BASE ITS BEING RAIDED!!!!


Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.

I would teleport them both to me and ask player y why did you kill player x. And when i heard player y's story. Then i ask player x to tell his/her story and see do they match anyway And ask proofs that what really happened. If player y RDMed player x i would warn player y for RDM.
If he didn't RDM would ask player x nicely do not make false f1s.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time

I would bring player y and player x and would ask their stories about thing what happened + ask for proofs what happened. If player y admits that he broke nlr i would warn him, If player y denies that he didn't break nlr i would ask for proof from player x and if he gives enough proof i would warn player y for lying to moderator and for NLR.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his base is being raided

I would give player x a verbal warning that don't metagame in chat and should use /pm or /g instead, if he keeps metagaming in ooc i would warn him for meta game

Why I should be chosen:
I love ZARP DarkRP server mostly server 1 + im i would enjoy making f1's because i know it may take alot of time to someone to answer. I have been take a LONG PAUSE when i started ZARP then i understood this is awesome server and i acutally enjoy playing it in and i started playing in it while and made some cool friends to help me out with DarkRP. I would be active i am addicted to this DarkRP server because its so unique from all others. I am excited if i would get Moderator because i just simply like to help people and i hate so many rulebreakers who ruins gaming totally from all other players and i wanna stop that. I gonna be friendly in F1 Sits and i try to keep calm if someone is totally lying and disrespecting me. Im clever on F1 situation and i will not warn for nothing. I gonna be serious on f1 sits Thanks for reading my moderator applicaton!

Big, fat, long, hard, juicy +SUPPORT

Put your type of post to Server Applications.
But the app is brilliant.

Holy crap 4 supports when my post is 5 minute old

How xD

Gr8 minge person +Support

Knows the rules
Good roleplayer
Kind
Calm
Deserves Mod

+Support

Thanks for all supports

Looks good James just add a bit more on some of your scenarios
+Support

First and foremost, we'd like to thank you for making the effort to apply for a rank on the ZARP Semi Serious DarkRP. Your application has been discussed at an administrative meeting, and from there it has been voted on.


Unfortunately as more staff members voted 'no' than 'yes', the application has been denied.

The meeting host has taken some criticisms made by the admins and provided you with this feedback:

You are welcome to apply again at any point.