TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] Not a Taco's Application

RP Name - Major General Fucknugget Gavin

Link to Steam Profile - steamcommunity.com/id/leldickbuttlel

SteamID - STEAM_0:0:47688148

Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/player/%EE%80%94%20N.../94.23.19.200:27015/

Server 2 - www.gametracker.com/player/%EE%80%94%20N.../94.23.19.200:27025/

(Notice: I change my name frequently, and doing so, the information may reset)

Age - 14 (15 very soon)

Estimated Server Time - 235+
Languages I speak - English only

Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario.
Random Death match, or RDM, is when a player kills another player without a valid RP reason.
Scenario: Michael walks into a gun store and buys a SPAS 12. He then walks across the street and shoots and kills Gavin without a valid RP reason.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario.
New Life rule is the rule that each time you die you start a new life and that you are not aloud to return to your death point until your NLR time is up. The rule still applies if you were CDMed, RDMed, or propkilled.
Scenario: Michael lock picks into Gavin's base and kills him in the process of the raid. Gavin then rushes back to his base once he respawns and kills Michael while he is still raiding, all before the NLR timer is up.

Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario.
Metagaming is writing IC info in OOC chat.
Scenario: Michael decides to raid Gavin. Gavin types in OOC chat: Ryan quick, I'm getting raided by Michael, get over here and kill him!

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.
I would begin by teleporting to Player X and ask for his side of the story. Once he is done explaining his side, I would then bring Player Y and ask for his side of the story. If it gets to the point in which both sides are telling different stories, I would then ask for evidence from either Player. If there is evidence of Player Y RDMing Player X, I would leave him with a warning and return him to his original position. If not, I would explain that there is no clear evidence of the incident and return Player y.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.
Similar to the RDM report, I would teleport to Player X and get both sides of the stories. If it gets to the point in which both sides are telling different stories, I would then ask for evidence from either Player. If there is evidence of Player Y breaking the NLR rule, I would leave him with a warning and return him to his original position. If not, I would explain that there is no clear evidence of the incident and return Player y.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided
I would ask for Player X to pm someone for help, rather than announce it in OOC. If Player X were to continue, I would leave him with a warning and be done.

Why I should be chosen (we recommend around 150 words).
Ever so recently, I've been becoming more and more active on both servers. What I have been seeing on both servers is that admins/moderators have been going offline more and more frequently, causing the server to switch into anarchy mode. I've tried in the past to stop the server from rule-breaking while administration was offline, but had obviously failed, terribly. Switching to a different topic, I help new players to the server get settled onto Zarp, and help them if asking about rules. Doing so, I've been on a good behavior recently on the server, and have been avoiding any sort of rule-breaking. I also have a history of being moderator on this server and have experience with dealing with F1s. In the past, before and after I was moderator, I've explained to people what the rules are of the server while in an admin sit. That is why I think I should be moderator.

P.S. Would you mind to post when the time and day of the admin meeting to ensure that I am not late or end up missing it.

"Estimated Server Time - I am unsure, I've been playing these servers since around 2013. (Over 100 I can ensure)"
Your server time is "235 Hours and 56 Minutes!" so far, you can just edit it too 235H+ or something like that

I can see you took your time to make your application.
Looks great so far, Maybe add some color to it

Mr_Headshot_999 wrote:
Just gonna say this real quick.
Don't you want to look professional when making an application..? You're applying for a position, i don't think you should use caps and say the words "FUCK" and "ASSHOLE".

Slapy47 wrote:
Thanks for the tip, will do.

First and foremost, we'd like to thank you for making the effort to apply for a rank on the ZARP Semi Serious DarkRP. Your application has been discussed at an administrative meeting, and from there it has been voted on.


As the number of 'yes' votes exceeded the number of 'no' votes you received, you have been Accepted..

Towards the bottom there is a button leading you to a download of a 'welcome pack' (moreso intended for new moderators) - this will give you a brief insight into your duty and how to do it, but before we can give you your rank you will have to attend a training session. You can ask any Superadmin/Headadmin for your training..

You need to attend a weekly meeting on our Teamspeak server (IP is 94.23.19.200), it would also be appreciated if you can click the banner in my signature and add me on steam so that we can manage the meetings more easily.

Congratulations on behalf of the administrative team.