TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] Darmag's application]

Details:
Rp name: IDF Darmag

Steam link: steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198139352278

Steam id: U:1:179086550

Gametracker stats:
Server 1: www.gametracker.com/player/Darmag/94.23.19.200:27015/
Server 2: www.gametracker.com/player/Darmag/94.23.19.200:27025/

Age: 16 Years old

Time playing in zarp dark rp servers: 200 hours (not sure)

Languages I speak i speak are Hebrew,Russian and English

DarkRP Related:

Explain RDM Random Death Match: RDA is a rule that says player are not allowed to kill another player without an available reason.
Example of RDM Random Death Match: Player X meet player Y on the street. Player X Kill player Y without any available reason

Explain NLR New life rule: NLR rule works 3 minutes after you died. It says that you cannot walk to the same place as new person (life) and kill or revange the person who killed you.
Example of NLR New life rule: Player X being raided by player Y. Player X decide to come back and revenge player Y and
secure the base.

Explain Metagamig out of character: metagaming is an "out of character" action where a player's character makes use of knowledge that the player is aware of but that the character is not meant to be aware of
Give an example of metagame out of character: Player X tell his friend to come to the base because their base being raided by someone.

How would you handle a situation of Player x accuses player y for RDMing him.
The first thing i will do, i will seek for mugs (/me) if player Y got mugged by player X so i will do nothing.
If player Y says that player X killed him for self defense i will ask for any proof if there is no so i will not warn player X or Y.
If player actually did the RDM i will warn player Y for RDM and i will finish the modsit.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR:
First thing i will do is ask for proof that player Y actually was on the same place before the NLR (3 min)
If player X killed player Y in a raid and player Y killed player X before 3 minutes left. I will warn player Y for breaking NLR and i will end the mod sit.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided.
I will warn player X for metagaming because he is sharing information that no one know.
(sharing knowlage)

Why I should be chosen (we recommend around 150 words)

I think i would be chosen for the mods because there is not that much good mods that taking the f1 request.
Also i would like to help and improve the server because i got many ideas to reduce lags and rule breaking to make the server playable for players that basing and making money . I want that players will enjoy playing zarpgaming without being killed in RDM. I want to kep the piece in the DarkRP servers.

Postives:
Active
Good Guy

Negatives:
Warned today (22/3/15)
Rushed App


Besides the point, there are a lot of mods on doing f1's but there are lots of f1's that take time.

Overall, -Support
Good Luck Bud!

I have moved your application to the correct section, in the future could you try and post your application in the correct one.

TiGzTeR wrote:
Well done Tigz!

Just recently warned you.

steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=412353073

-SUPPORT

Lol i had to kill because he propushed my car XD

He answer to all the questions and make a good App

+SUPPORT

Hi there Darmag! I've seen you break NLR multiple times and your knowledge of the rules is very poor.
Please take a time reading the SSRP rules by doing !motd or /rules ingame! I don't want to see you as a mod until this is fixed!
-support

-Support

Recent warnings.

darmag wrote:
Calling your (maybe) future colleagues lazy and saying they're not doing their job.

Kek.

- Support
Rushed app
Recent warnings
Could improve gametime

<strong>First and foremost,</strong> we'd like to thank you for making the effort to apply for a rank on the ZARP Semi Serious DarkRP. Your application has been discussed at an administrative meeting, and from there it has been voted on.


Unfortunately as more staff members voted 'no' than 'yes', the application has been denied.

The meeting host has taken some criticisms made by the admins and provided you with this feedback:

You are welcome to apply again at any point.